GENDER DIFFERENCE IN MATHEMATICAL LITERACY AND FACTOR THAT MAY AFFECT IT

PERBEDAAN GENDER DALAM LITERASI MATEMATIS DAN FAKTOR YANG MUNGKIN MEMENGARUHINYA

  • Muhamad Syahidul Qirom Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    (ID)
  • Turmudi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    (ID)
  • Dadang Juandi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    (ID)
Keywords: Gender, Mathematical Literacy, Mathematics, PISA

Abstract

Many research studies have shown that female students’ mathematical literacy is better than male students. However, the previous research viewed students’ mathematical literacy qualitatively. Maybe there are differences between the mathematical literacy of male and female students, but is it genuinely significant? Therefore, this research aimed to quantitatively investigate the differences in mathematical literacy between male and female students to provide empirical proof. In this study, 116 students at junior high school were the samples. The mathematical literacy test collected data about students’ mathematical literacy. The data were then analyzed using a comparison test of Mann-Whitney U to examine the hypotheses. The result showed no significant difference between male and female students’ mathematical literacy and whether, in general, and viewed from gender, students have low mathematical literacy. The factor that may affect the low and no significant difference between male and female students regarding mathematical literacy is teachers rarely provide students with mathematical literacy problems during the teaching and learning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar, J. J. (2021). High school students’ reasons for disliking mathematics: The intersection between teacher’s role and student’s emotions, belief and self-efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0658. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11294.

Andersson, U. (2007). The contribution of working memory to children’s mathematical word problem-solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1201–1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1317.

Attard, C. (2012). Engagement with mathematics: What does it mean and what does it look like? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(1), 9–12.

Aufa, N. I., & Manoy, J. T. (2022). Students’ mathematical literacy in solving assessment kompetensi minimum in terms of gender. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n1.p219-229.

Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.699.

Dogan-Dunlap, H. (2004). Changing students’ perception of mathematics through an integrated, collaborative, field-based approach to teaching and learning mathematics. Joint Mathematics Meetings of the AMS/MAA. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490407.

Fery, M. F., Wahyudin, & Tatang, H. (2017). Improving primary students' mathematical literacy through problem-based learning and direct instruction. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3072.

Fointuna, D. W., Kaluge, A. H., & Fernandez, A. J. (2020). An analysis of mathematical literacy of state junior high school students in Kupang. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012025.

Gabay-Egozi, L., Nitsche, N., & Grieger, L. (2022). In their footsteps or shadow? Gender differences in choosing a STEM major as a function of sibling configuration and older sibling’s gender and math ability. Sex Roles, 86(1–2), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01255-0.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed). Pearson.

Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., & Goos, M. (2015). A critical orientation to numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM, 47(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0648-1.

Hendroanto, A., Istiandaru, A., Syakrina, N., Setyawan, F., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, A. S. E. (2018). How students solve PISA tasks: An overview of students’ mathematical literacy. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i2.10713.

Herawati, R., & Marfuah, I. (2021). Analysis of student errors in solving mathematics problems at Muhammadiyah Senior High School special program of Kottabarat Surakarta City. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 3239–3252. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.952.

Holenstein, M., Bruckmaier, G., & Grob, A. (2021). Transfer effects of mathematical literacy: An integrative longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00491-4.

Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53.

Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(22), 8801–8807. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901265106.

Indrawati, F. A., Wardono, W., & Junaedi, I. (2022). Mathematics literacy ability in terms of self-efficacy in cooperative learning type of group investigation model with humanism approach assisted by Schoology. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 11(1), 83–93.

Keller, L., Preckel, F., Eccles, J. S., & Brunner, M. (2022). Top-performing math students in 82 countries: An integrative data analysis of gender differences in achievement, achievement profiles, and achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 966–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000685.

Kemdikbud. (2019). Laporan nasioanal PISA 2018 Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kharis, S. A. A., Salsabila, E., & Haeruman, L. D. (2021). Effect of mathematical concept understanding and mathematical reasoning on mathematical literacy abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012042.

Khotimah, S. H., Budi, A. S., & Sumantri, M. S. (2019). Improving mathematical literacy ability of elementary school students through field trip learning. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 6(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v6i2.5014.

Lanya, H., Zayyadi, M., Sulfiah, S. K., & Roziq, A. (2021). Students’ mathematical literacy on the performance of PISA questions: What is gender correlation? Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 8(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v8i2.20570.

Ma’rup, M., Husniati, A., Usman, M. R., & Kristiawati, K. (2020). Mathematical literacy ability of camper-type students based on gender differences. MaPan, 8(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2020v8n2a8.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/.

Nurwahid, M., & Ashar, S. (2022). A literature review: Efforts to overcome student’s mathematical literacy. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 6(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol6-iss2/666.

OECD. (2018). PISA 2022 mathematics framework. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing.

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1).

Pina, V., Martella, D., Chacon-Moscoso, S., Saracostti, M., & Fenollar-Cortes, J. (2021). Gender-based performance in mathematical facts and calculations in two elementary school samples from Chile and Spain: An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 703580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703580.

Pomalato, S. W. D., Ili, L., Ningsi, B. A., Fadhilaturrahmi, F., Hasibuan, A. T., & Primayana, K. H. (2020). Student error analysis in solving mathematical problems. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5183–5187. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081118.

Popovic, G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). Implications of informal education experiences for mathematics teachers’ ability to make connections beyond the formal classroom: Informal experiences for math teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12114.

Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as a 21st-century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 042088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088.

Sam, L. C., & Ernest, P. (2000). A survey of public images of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520076.

Sanchal, A., & Sharma, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes towards learning mathematics: Impact of teaching in a sporting context. Teachers and Curriculum, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v17i1.151.

Sari, R. H. N., & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10649.

Sari, R. M., & Khotimah, R. P. (2023). Analysis of mathematic literacy ability in solving problems in arithmetic sequences and series based on gender view. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 11(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i2.7336.

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z.-H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T.-W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9.

Yulia, Y., Kustati, M., & Afriadi, J. (2021). Mathematical literacy: A case study on Padang students’ mathematical ability. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v12i1.8538.

Yusuf, R. M. M., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2022). Analisis kesalahan numerasi peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal assesmen kompetensi minimum. Jurnal Paedagogy, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v9i1.4507.

Published
2023-12-26
Section
Vol. 11 No. 2
Abstract viewed = 116 times