DEVELOPMENT OF ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) INSTRUMENTS ON CONGRUENCE AND SIMILARITY SUBJECT FOR GRADE IX JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) PADA MATERI KEKONGRUENAN DAN KESEBANGUNAN UNTUK PESERTA DIDIK KELAS IX SMP

  • Nurul Hidayah Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar
    (ID)
  • Ruslan Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar
    (ID)
  • Awi Dassa Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar
    (ID)
Keywords: Assessment for Learning (AfL), Development Procedures, Validity and Reliability, Congruence and Similarity

Abstract

This study aims to (1) know the development process assessment for learning (AfL) instruments on congruence and similarity subjects for grade IX junior high school students; (2) produce an assessment for learning (AfL) instruments on congruence and similarity subjects for grade IX junior high school students that are valid and reliable. This present study is development research involving 126 grade IX students of SMP Islam Athirah 2 Makassar. The results showed that: (1) the process of developing assessment for learning (AfL) instruments on congruence and similarity subject for grade IX junior high school students was carried out through the stages of compiling instrument specifications (including determining the purpose of the instrument, compiling the instrument grid, choosing the shape and format of the instrument, determining the length of the instrument, and determining the instrument scales and scoring systems), writing instruments, reviewing instruments (content validity test and instruments improvement), conducting instrument trials, interpreting measurement results, analyzing instruments (construct validity and reliability tests), and assembling instruments; (2) the results of the development of assessment for learning (AfL) instruments on congruence and similarity subject for grade IX junior high school students consisted of a learning process assessment test, a learning outcome assessment test, and a rubric for assessing cognitive aspects, psychomotor aspects, and affective aspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, I. G. N. (2016). Tantangan, keberhasilan, dan kebanggaan statistikawan. Retirement Speech of Prof. Drs. I Gusti Ngurah Agung, M.Sc., M.St., Ph.D. Makassar, Indonesia: Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Norwich: DfES Publications.

Azwar, S. (2014). Pustaka pelajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bulan, S. (2021). Pengembangan asesmen berbasis proyek dalam pembelajaran matematika peserta didik kelas IX SMP. Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Hamzah, A. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Putri, I. K. A. (2022). Asesmen dalam pembelajaran. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.

Raharjo, S. B., Handayani, M., Jauhari, M. R. A., Juanita, F., & Waspodo, R. M. (2019). Sistem penjaminan mutu pendidikan. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Ruslan. (2006). Aplikasi analisis faktor dalam uji-validitas instrumen penelitian. Seminar Nasional Statistika IKAPSTAT Institut Teknologi Surabaya Dan Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNM. Makassar: FMIPA UNM.

Ruslan. (2009). Validitas isi. Bulein Pa’ Biretta. Makassar: Media Informasi dan Komunikasi LPMP Sulawesi Selatan.

Sappaile, B. I. (2005). Validitas dan reliabilitas tes yang memuat butir dikotomi dan politomi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (Parameter) Lembaga Penelitian UNJ, 22(24), 99–107.

Sappaile, B. I. (2007). Konsep instrumen penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 066, 379–391.

Setiyawan, R. A., & Wijayanti, P. S. (2020). Analisis kualitas instrumen untuk mengukur kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa selama pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi. Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Sains, 1(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v1i2.26.

Susetyo, B. (2015). Prosedur penyusunan dan analisis tes. Bandung: Rafika Aditama.

Thalaat, M. (2022). Pengaruh CTL dan asesmen autentik terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas IV SDN gugus selatan kec. Lenek tahun ajaran 2021/2022. COLLAPSE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 5(2), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.22460/collase.v5i2.10420.

Uno, H. B., & Satria, K. (2012). Asesmen pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Akasara.

Yudha, R. P., Masrukan, M., & Djuniadi, D. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen otentik unjuk kerja materi bangun ruang di sekolah dasar. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 3(2), 62–67. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/article/view/4397.

Yusron, E., & Sudiyatno, S. (2021). How is the impact of assessment for learning (AfL) on mathematics learning in elementary schools? Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 75–84.

Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Asesmen dan evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Yuwono, M. R., & Syaifuddin, M. W. (2017). Pengembangan problem based learning dengan assessment for learning berbantuan smartphone dalam pembelajaran matematika. Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 10(2), 184–202.

Published
2024-02-05
Section
Vol. 12 No. 1
Abstract viewed = 260 times