Analysis of Students' Science Process Skills in Physics Material in Online Learning

  • Salwa Rufaida Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
    (ID)
  • Riskawati Riskawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
    (ID)
  • Sindi Sindi Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
    (ID)
Keywords: science process skills, physics material, online learning

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the science process skills possessed by students during online learning on physics material. The type of research used is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. In this study, instruments of physics science process skills will be distributed to 30 students of class XI who are in the top 10 at three high schools in Gowa Regency that are still implementing the online learning system to date, namely SMA Aksara Bajeng, SMA Handayani Sungguminasa, and SMAN 19 Gowa. Science process skills instruments are shared online. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results showed that in general the science process skills possessed by the dominant students were in the low category with the highest frequency of 13 people, 12 people in the medium category, 4 people in the very low category and 1 person in the high category. Meanwhile, for each indicator of science process skills, of the 7 indicators, there are 4 indicators that are in the low category and 3 indicators are in the medium category. So it can be concluded that the students' science process skills on physics material in dominant online learning are still relatively low.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. P. Arifah Prima Satrianingrum, “Persepsi Guru Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring di PAUD,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 633, 2020, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.574.

P. Winarti, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan Konsep Dasar IPA Fisika Secara Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Komun. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 93, 2021, doi: 10.32585/jkp.v5i1.1076.

H. Putria, L. H. Maula, and D. A. Uswatun, “Analisis Proses Pembelajaran dalam Jaringan (DARING) Masa Pandemi Covid- 19 Pada Guru Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 861–870, 2020.

A. Permata and Y. B. Bhakti, “Keefektifan Virtual Class dengan Google Classroom dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19,” JIPFRI (Jurnal Inov. Pendidik. Fis. dan Ris. Ilmiah), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2020, doi: 10.30599/jipfri.v4i1.669.

R. Erina and H. Kuswanto, “PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN InSTAD TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS DAN HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF FISIKA DI SMA,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 202, 2015, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7507.

N. Napsawati, “Analisis Situasi Pembelajaran Ipa Fisika Dengan Metode Daring Di Tengah Wabah Covid-19,” Karst J. Pendidik. Fis. DAN Ter., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2020, doi: 10.46918/karst.v3i1.546.

W. Muzdalifah, M. Irianti, and M. Maimurni, “Applying Multirepresentation Based Physics Learning To Improve the Ability of Representation of Students in Class X Mipa2 Sma Babussalam Pekanbaru,” J. Geliga Sains J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 67, 2019, doi: 10.31258/jgs.6.2.67-74.

R. Diani, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter dengan Model Problem Based Instruction,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 243–255, 2015, doi: 10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v4i2.96.

L. Muh. Tawil, Keterampilan - keterampilan Sains dan Implemensinya dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Makassar: Badan Penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar, 2014.

M. Y. Lestari and N. Diana, “Keterampilan proses sains (KPS) pada pelaksanaan praktikum Fisika Dasar I,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSME/article/view/2474/1828

Y. Subekti and A. Ariswan, “Pembelajaran fisika dengan metode eksperimen untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan proses sains,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 252, 2016, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v2i2.6278.

H. Siswono, “Analisis Pengaruh Keterampilan Proses Sains Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa,” Momentum Phys. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 83, 2017, doi: 10.21067/mpej.v1i2.1967.

A. Mahardini and M. Mahitsa, “Analisis Situasi Penggunaan Google Classroom pada Pembelajaran Daring Fisika,” J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 215, 2020, doi: 10.24127/jpf.v8i2.3102.

Y. A. Noor et al., “Praksis Praktikum Fisika Mode Daring : Studi Kasus Pembelajaran di SMA / MA Jawa,” Unnes Phys. Educ. J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 276–283, 2020.

S. Maulidina and Y. B. Bhakti, “Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Online Dalam Pemahaman Dan Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Konsep Pelajaran Fisika,” ORBITA J. Kajian, Inov. dan Apl. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 248, 2020, doi: 10.31764/orbita.v6i2.2592.

J. P. Langi, “Keywords: physics; online learning; zoom meeting; learning outcomes,” Syntax Admiration, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2021.

R. Pawicara and M. Conilie, “Analisis Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Kejenuhan Belajar Mahasiswa Tadris Biologi Iain Jember di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19,” ALVEOLI J. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2020.

Y. A. Lede, “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring Program Studi Pendidikan IPA dan Pendidikan Fisika STKIP Weetebula,” Saintifik, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 2020, doi: 10.31605/saintifik.v6i2.314.

R. H. Saputra, J. A. Baba, and G. Y. K. S. Siregar, “Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Modifikasi Skala Likert Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Explor. J. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat., vol. 9, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.36448/jsit.v9i1.1029.

L. R. Aiken, “Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 1985, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644854.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. 2013.

P. A. Rahayu, Ai Hayati, “Analisis Profil Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Sekolah Dasar Di Kabupaten Sumedang,” Pesona Dasar (Jurnal Pendidik. Dasar dan Humaniora), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 22–33, 2017, doi: 10.24815/pear.v7i2.14753.

S. Yu and G. Li, “Study on the Cultivation of Observation Ability of Secondary School Students,” in Advances in Computer Science Research, 2018, vol. 83, pp. 1103–1106. doi: 10.2991/snce-18.2018.228.

Y. Shi, Y. Mi, J. Li, and W. Liu, “Concurrent concept-cognitive learning model for classification,” Sci. Program., vol. 498, pp. 65–81, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.009.

K. Shao et al., “Comprehensive evaluation of BRCA1/2 variant interpretation ability among laboratories in China,” J. Med. Genet., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 230–236, 2022, doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107360.

Z. Xiongwei, P. Bei, and S. Kun, “Assessment of the interpretation ability of domestic satellites in geological remote sensing,” Remote Sens. Nat. Resour., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.6046/zrzyyg.2020357.

B. F. Sheyab and M. M. Abu Gazal, “The Predictive Ability of Learning Style and Academic Motivation in Academic Procrastination in the Light of Perfectionism Among in Academic Procrastination in the Light of Perfectionism Among Yarmouk University Students,” J. Al-Quds Open Univ. Educ. Psychol. Res. Stud., vol. 12, no. 37, pp. 130–145, 2021, doi: 10.33977/1182-012-037-009.

I. D. Andani, S. H. B. Prastowo, and Supeno, “Identifikasi kemampuan penalaran hipotesis-deduktif siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran fisika materi hukum newton,” Semin. Nas. Quantum, vol. 25, pp. 562–568, 2018.

S. Lestari, B. Akbar, and L. Safahi, “Model Guided Inquiry Learning : Kemampuan Menggunakan Metode Ilmiah,” BIOCHEPHY J. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.52562/biochephy.v1i1.22.

S. R. Manurung and M. Sinambela, “Peningkatan Pembelajaran Ipa Melalui Pengelolan Praktikum,” in SEMINAR NASIONAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT LPM UNIMED 2017, 2017, pp. 144–147.

A. J. Khoiriyah, “Penerapan Inkuiri Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Dan Pengetahuan Siswa Smpn 18 Malang,” Strateg. J. Inov. Strateg. dan Model Pembelajaran, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 78–82, 2021, doi: 10.51878/strategi.v2i1.926.

S. Balbay, “A Specific Implementation of Reflective Journals in Self-Regulating Academic Presentation Skills,” Int. e-Journal Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 12–24, 2021, doi: 10.31458/iejes.761278.

S. Horiuchi, J. S. Nasser, and K. C. Chung, “The Art of a Scientific Presentation: Tips from Steve Jobs,” Plast. Reconstr. Surg., vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 533–540, 2022, doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008849.

A. Akmam, R. Hidayat, F. Mufit, N. Jalinus, and A. Amran, “Problems of students in following the online learning process in the covid-19 pandemic,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1876, no. 1, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012083.

M. Syazali, A. N. Rahmatih, and N. Nursaptini, “Profil Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Melalui Implementasi SPADA Unram,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 103–112, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v16i1.2290.

C. L. Chang and M. Fang, “E-Learning and Online Instructions of Higher Education during the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) Epidemic,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1574, no. 1, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012166.

C. Hatcher, E. Price, P. S. Smith, C. Turpen, and E. Brewe, “Closeness in a physics faculty online learning community predicts impacts in self-efficacy and teaching,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.09306.

B. Van Dusen and J. Nissen, “Associations between learning assistants, passing introductory physics, and equity: A quantitative critical race theory investigation,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVPHYSEDUCRES.16.010117.

I. Salaoru, “Engaged pedagogy: An Innovative method to Teach Physics,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2006.02190 Focus to learn more.

O. Passon, T. Zügge, and J. Grebe-Ellis, “Pitfalls in the teaching of elementary particle physics,” Phys. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/aadbc7.

J. Park, M.-K. Shin, H. S. Shim, G.-G. Lee, and S.-K. Lee, “Developing a Science Simulation Program to Teach the Concept of Balance in Physics: Its Development and Application for Gifted Korean Elementary Students of Science,” J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 975–984, 2019, doi: 10.32861/jssr.55.975.984.

E. Murdani, “Hakikat Fisika dan keterampilan proses Sains,” J. Filsafat Indones., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 72–80, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jfi.v3i3.22195.

D. Tsaniyyah, A. Marianti, and W. Isnaeni, “Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Materi Sel Dengan Model Problem Base Learning Berbantuan Tutor Sebaya,” Phenom. J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 2019, doi: 10.21580/phen.2019.9.1.3229.

I. Royani, B. Mirawati, and H. Jannah, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Langsung Berbasis Praktikum Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa,” Prism. Sains J. Pengkaj. Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Mat. dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 46, 2018, doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.966.

I. R. Mahmudah, Y. S. Makiyah, and D. Sulistyaningsih, “Profil Keterampilan Proses Sains (KPS) Siswa SMA di Kota Bandung,” J. Diffr., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2019, doi: 10.37058/diffraction.v1i1.808.

R. Fitriani et al., “Mendeskripsikan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa melalui Kegiatan Praktikum Viskositas di SMAN 1 Muaro Jambi,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 173–179, 2021, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.5.2.173-179.

Published
2024-11-05
How to Cite
Rufaida, S., Riskawati, R., & Sindi, S. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Science Process Skills in Physics Material in Online Learning. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 12(2), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v12i2.46082
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 22 times