Validitas Isi dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penilaian Harian Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab MI Manarul Islam Malang
Abstract
The aims of this research are: 1) to find out the content validity of the Arabic subject in the Daily Assessment (PH) at MI Manarul Islam Malang. 2) to determine the reliability of the Arabic language subject in the Daily Assessment (PH) in the form of multiple choice questions and entries at MI Manarul Islam Malang. This research is a type of quantitative research with data collection techniques through tests from a research sample of 36 students in grades 4A and 4B for the 2022/2023 academic year as well as analysis of testing the test instrument items consisting of validity tests and reliability tests evaluated using SPSS version 22 In the daily assessment of a foreign language subject, namely Arabic, student answer sheets are used to assess the validity of the items and the reliability of the test instrument test (Arabic). The results of this study are where the items in the daily assessment of the MI Manarul Islam Malang Arabic subject in the multiple choice question validity test consist of 20 questions, 12 of which are classified as valid while the other 8 items are classified as invalid. While the questions in the form of fields consisting of 10 questions are classified as valid as a whole. In the reliability test, the multiple choice questions were declared to have high reliability. While the results of the reliability test in the form of filled in items were stated to have very high reliability.
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Azwar, Saifuddin. 2012. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Bajpai, S., & Bajpai, R. (2014). Goodness of measurement: reliability and validity. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 3(2), 112-116
Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco: Pearson Education, Inc.
Happy Fitria, Muhammad Kristiawan, dkk, “Upaya Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru Melalui Pelatihan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas”, Jurnal Abdimas Unwahas, Vol. 4, No. 1, April 2019, hlm. 15
House, E.R. (2012). Introduction. In Kellaghan, T., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.). International
Handbook of Educational Evaluation: Part One: Perspectives/Part Two: Practice (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.
Margono, S. 1997. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta
Noor, Juliansyah. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian: Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, dan Karya Ilmiah. Jakarta: Kencana
Ratnawulan, Elis dan Rusdiana, A. 2015. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia
Pramono, Sigit. 2014. Panduan Evaluasi Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Diva Press
Salim, Latifah. 2015. JurnalAdabiyah: Peranan Bahasa Arab Terhadap Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jurnal Vol. 15 Nomor 2
Sudijono, Anas. 2011. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada
Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Insan Madani: Yogyakarta.
Sullivan, G. M. (2011). A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 3:119-120
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research
UU RI no 20 tahun 2003 tentang sisdiknas & Peraturan Pemerintah RI no 47 2008 tentang Wajib Belajar
Widoyoko, Eko Putra. 2012. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran (Panduan Praktis bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Winda Kusuma Wardani, “Analisis Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Dalam Proses Pembelajaran di SD Muhammadiyah 15 Surakarta”, Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2023 Alfi Maghfirotunnisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.