Front Antagonism Towards Social and Political Integration Perspectives on the Social Science of Prophetic
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is talking about conflict antagonism which is a social phenomenon that often confuses sociologists. It is not an interesting problem, but because of the same phenomenon discussed, but the results are always the opposite. Especially in seeing the nature of conflicts that occur in society. Conflict is usually dysfunctional in society but at the same time becomes structural. This study uses the conflict method proposed by Lewis Coser to discuss societies that have a pattern of social integration of processes that address structural conflicts so that dynamic societies seek a form of balance. The results showed that the conflict that occurred to achieve the intended purpose was social support. Social legitimacy formed by press groups will produce horizontal conflicts and vice versa if it is legally agreed by consensus then it will become an integration tool. So far, many ideas have been resolved in conflict resolution for integration purposes. This research is reviewed from the perspective of prophetic social science, one of the important ideas of Kuntowijoyo. For him, social science should not be complacent in trying to explain or understand reality, but social science must also carry the task of transformation towards ideals that are idealized by society. Three basic values as the basis of prophetic social science, namely: humanization, liberation, and transcendence.
يتحدث هذا البحث عن عداوة الصراع وهي ظاهرة اجتماعية غالبًا ما تربك علماء الاجتماع. ليس بسبب مشكلة مثيرة للاهتمام، ولكن بسبب نفس الظاهرة التي نوقشت، لكن النتائج دائمًا ما تكون عكس ذلك. خاصة في رؤية طبيعة الصراعات التي تحدث في المجتمع .عادة ما يكون الصراع غير فعال في المجتمع ولكن في نفس الوقت يصبح هيكلية .تستخدم هذه الدراسة طريقة الصراع التي اقترحها لويس كوسر لمناقشة المجتمعات التي لديها نمط من التكامل الاجتماعي للعمليات التي تعالج الصراعات الهيكلية، بحيث تسعى المجتمعات الديناميكية إلى شكل من أشكال التوازن .أظهرت النتائج أن الصراع الذي حدث لتحقيق الغرض المقصود كان الدعم الاجتماعي .ستؤدي الشرعية الاجتماعية التي تشكلها المجموعات الصحفية إلى صراع أفقي والعكس صحيح إذا تمت الموافقة عليها قانونًا بتوافق الآراء، فسوف تصبح أداة تكام . حتى الآن، تم حل العديد من الأفكار في حل النزاعات لأغراض التكامل. تتم مراجعة هذا البحث من منظور العلوم الاجتماعية النبوية، وهي واحدة من أفكار Kuntowijoyo الهامة .بالنسبة له، لا ينبغي أن يكون العلم الاجتماعي مقتصرا في محاولة تفسير الواقع أو فهمه، ولكن يجب أن يحمل العلم الاجتماعي أيضًا مهمة التحول نحو المثل العليا التي يعتبرها المجتمع مثالية. هناك ثلاث قيم أساسية كأساس لعلم الاجتماع النبوي، وهي الإنسانية والتحرير والتعالي.
Penelitian ini berbicara tentang antagonisme konflik yang merupakan fenomena sosial yang sering membingungkan sosiolog. Bukan karena masalah yang menarik, tetapi karena fenomena yang sama yang dibahas, tetapi hasilnya selalu berlawanan. Terutama dalam melihat sifat-sifat konflik yang terjadi di masyarakat. Konflik biasanya disfungsional dalam masyarakat tetapi pada saat yang sama menjadi struktural. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode konflik yang diusulkan oleh Lewis Coser untuk membahas masyarakat yang memiliki pola integrasi sosial dari proses yang mengatasi konflik struktural, sehingga masyarakat yang dinamis mencari bentuk keseimbangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konflik yang terjadi untuk mencapai tujuan yang dimaksud adalah dukungan sosial. Legitimasi sosial yang dibentuk oleh kelompok pers akan menghasilkan konflik horizontal dan sebaliknya jika disetujui secara sah melalui konsensus maka itu akan menjadi alat integrasi. Sejauh ini, banyak ide telah diselesaikan dalam resolusi konflik untuk tujuan integrasi. Penelitian ini diulas dari perspektif Ilmu sosial profetik, salah satu ide penting dari Kuntowijoyo. Baginya, ilmu sosial tidak boleh berpuas diri dalam mencoba menjelaskan atau memahami realitas, tetapi ilmu sosial juga harus membawa tugas transformasi menuju cita-cita yang diidealkan oleh masyarakat. Tiga nilai dasar sebagai dasar ilmu sosial profetik, yaitu: humanisasi, pembebasan, dan transendensi.
Downloads
Article Details
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE STATEMENT
COPYRIGHT
Jurnal Adabiyah is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restriction to their work. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, and print the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LICENSE TO PUBLISH
1. License
The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content for any purpose, even commercially, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the corresponding author warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this statement.
5. Miscellaneous
Jurnal Adabiyah may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
References
Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Polotik. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.
Craib, IAI. Modern Social Theory: From Parsons to Habermas. Paul S. Baut, T. Effendi, Jakarta: PT. Grafindo Persada, 1994.
Doyle Paul, Johnson. Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern I & II, Robert M.Z. Lawang (Pent). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia, 1988.
Duverger, Maurice. The Study of Politics, Daniel Dhakidae (Pent). Jakarta: Pt. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1998.
Gaffar, Afan. Politik Indonesia; Transsisi Menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2000.
Gatara, A. A. Said dan Moh. Dzulkiah Said. Sosiologi Politik, Konsep dan Dinamika Perkembangan Kajian. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia, 2007.
George. Ritzer, Douglas J. Gogman, Contemporary sociological theory, diterj. Alimandan. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana. 2004.
Giddens, Anthony. (Ed) 1975, Positivism and sociology, London: Heinemann
Hardiman, F. Budi. ”Ilmu Sosial dalam Diskursus Modernisme dan Pascamodernisme” dalam suplemen Jurnal Ulumul Quran, (Nomor 1, Vol. V, tahun 1994)
http://perilakuorganisasi.com/ralf-dahrendorf-teori-konflik.html
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilmu_sosial_profetik
https://www.kompasiana.com/edi_akhiles/551098838133117e3cbc6576/kritik-nalar-arab-muhammad-abed-al-jabiri
John, A., Rex. Key Problems of Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.
Jurdi, Syarifuddin. Ilmu Politik Profetik: Historisitas, Kontekstualitas, Integrasi Keilmuan, dalam ilmu Politik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit, Pt. Gramasurya, 2015.
Jurdi, Syarifuddin. Sosiologi Politik: Paradigma Islam untuk Studi Sosial Kemanusiaan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit PT. Gramasurya, 2017.
Khan, Qamaruddin. The political Thought of Ibnu Taimiyah, diterj. Anas Mahyuddin, Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka, 1973.
Kuntowijoyo. Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi untuk aksi. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan, 1993.
Majid, Nurcholis. Cita-Cita Politik Islam Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Paramadina, 1999.
Niklas, Lukmann. The differentiation of society. New York: Colombia University Press, 1982.
Poloma M. Margaret. Contemporary Sociological Theory, diterj. Yosogama. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1994.
Rush, Michael & Phillip Althoff. An Introduction to Political Sociology, diterj. Kartini Kartono. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1997.
Scott, John. Social Theory: Central issues in Sociology, diterj. Ahmad Lintang Lazuardi, Penerbit, Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
Shihab, Quraish. Tafsir Al-Misbah, Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian al-Quran. Jakarta: Penerbit Lentera Hati, 2010.
Talcott, Parson. “An overview” dalam Knowledge and society, Voice of America, Forum Lecture, 1968.
Turner, Jonathan H., Alexandra Maryanski and Stephan Fucs. The Structure of Sociological Theory (Fifth Edition) Belmont: California Wadsworth inc., 1991.