READABILITY OF ENGLISH WRITTEN MATERIALS

  • Nur Rachma Isnaeni Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)

Abstract

Abstract

The best way to ensure readability of the content is by look out for principles in clear writing. In theory this means avoiding many long syllable words, unusual words, or long and awkward sentences.This study analyzed how readable is English written materials used for high school students and what factors do the readability of written language affect. To answer these, a descriptive quantitative research has been conducted and the English written materials taken as a subject. It is found that The Fog Index provides numerous benefits for many people include educators, librarians, publishers, and even students. Most importantly, it allows us to shape and edit our writing for a particular audience.

 

Abstrak

Cara terbaik untuk memastikan keterbacaan isi buku adalah dengan melihat prinsip-prinsip dalam menulis.Dalam teori, ini berarti menghindari banyak kata yang panjang suku kata, kata-kata yang tidak biasa, atau kalimat yang panjang dan canggung. Studi ini menganalisis bagaimana keterbacaan materi tertulis bahasa Inggris yang digunakan oleh siswa SMA dan faktor-faktor apayang mempengaruhi keterbacaan materi. Untuk menjawab ini, penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif telah dilakukan dan materi tertulis bahasa Inggris diambil sebagai subjek.Hasil menunjukkan bahwa Fog Index memberikan pengaruh positif bagi banyak orang termasuk pendidik, pustakawan, penerbit, dan bahkan siswa dalam memahami materi tertulis bahasa Inggris. Yang paling penting, memungkinkan kita untuk membentuk dan mengedit tulisan kita untuk pembaca tertentu.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnold, B. (2004). Online readability: theory & test. Retrieved from http://www.caslon.com.au/readabilitynote2.htm on December 2009

Creech, J.C & Whitt, H.P. (1982).Gunning down the fog: a test of the unintelligibility and illiteracy hypothesis. Retrieved from http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/bitstream/1808/4931/1/MARSV8N1A2.pdf on December 2009

DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/bf/46.pdf on December 2009

________________ (2006).Smart language: Readers, Readability, and the Grading of Text. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/naal/ on December 2009

Flesch, K. (2004). Fog index formulas measure readability. Retrieved from http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/newsletter/plwork08.htm on June 2008

Georges, T.M. (1996). Analytical writing for science and technology. Retrieved from http://home.comcast.net/%7Etgeorges/write/index.html on December 2009

Guilford College.Gunning’s fog index. Retrieved from http://www.guilford.edu/about_guilford/services_and_administration/writing/index.html on December 2009

Gunning, R. (1952).The Technique of Clear Writing. McGraw-Hill

Johnson, C. (1987). Readability, School Science Review. Retrieved from http://www.timetabler.com/download.html on December 2009

Juicy Studio.Readability test. Retrieved from http://plainlanguage.com/newreadability.html on December 2009

Kathy, E.G. (2004).Readability. Retrieved from http://courses.washington.edu/com586/2004/week_7_readability_gunning.html on December 2009

Klein, P. (2006). How bad is academic writing, really?. Retrieved from http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/05/15/how-bad-is-academic-writing-really/ on December 2009

Linsear, W. (2006).Lazy word checks writing carefully. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/%7Evcecn006/read1.html#Lazy%20Word on December 2009

Mackinnon, M. (2009).A Gunning-Fog and Flesch-Kincaid plugin for WordPress. Retrieved from http://www.websiteforensics.com/wordpress/a-gunning-fog-and-flesch-kincaid-plugin-for-wordpress/ on December 2009

Mid-Continent Comprehension Centre. (2003). The fog index. Retrieved from http://www.mc3edsupport.org/community/knowledgebases/mc3-the-fog-index-589.html.on December 2009

Roka, L. (2006). Clear the Fog from annual reports. Retrieved from http://www.pageturnpro.com/MediaNews-Group/10016-Utah-CEO-December-Issue/index.html#1 on December 2009

_______ (2003).K-U-A-S-A-I lebih cepat. Bandung: Kaifa.

Tefl Spin. (2009). Readability formulas: The fog index. Retrieved from http://www.teflspin.com/2009/04/readability-formulas-fog-index.html on December 2009

The Reporting Skills & Professional Writing Handbook 2nd Edition (2008).Measuring Clarity. Retrieved from http://www.reportingskills.org/webexplore/index.html on December 2009

Web Accessibility in Mind. (1999). Writing clearly and simply. Retrieved from http://www.nald.ca/fulltext/readab/readab.pdfon December 2009

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.In reading, writing and typography. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typography#Readability_and_legibilityon December 2009

Writing to inspire. (2002). The Fog Index: A powerful tool for any writer. Retrieved from http://www.writing-information-and-tips.com/writing-information-blog.html on December 2009

Published
2017-09-08
How to Cite
Isnaeni, N. R. (2017). READABILITY OF ENGLISH WRITTEN MATERIALS. Elite : English and Literature Journal, 1(1), 179-191. Retrieved from https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/elite/article/view/3356
Section
Volume 1 Number 1, December 2013
Abstract viewed = 440 times