Risk Detection in Digital Information Management: A Records Management Perspective
Abstract
The Presidential Regulation on e-Government in 2018 became the starting point for accelerating e-Government implementation in Indonesia. This moment prompted government agencies to compete in digitizing their organizations to apply the regulation. Digital information as the output of this massive digitalization will be abundant and must be managed properly which is certainly vulnerable to threats. Such threats can compromise the authenticity of records and make them untrustworthy. An adequate risk detection framework that fits the context of the digital environment is needed to minimize these incidents. This framework contains a records management perspective that has undergone a paradigmatic shift. This framework adopts the view that records management is an integral part of digital information management. The study used a qualitative method and found that from the perspective of records management, the risk detection framework in digital information management sheds light on aspects of context (external and internal), systems, and processes. However, its smooth implementation in the digital environment, especially in Indonesia, is determined by the extent to which paradigmatic reforms in records management have taken place.
Downloads
References
Anderson, K. (2015). “Building Trust and Confidence through Sustainable Information Systems Research: Towards a Common Future.” In 5th International Conference The Future of Information Sciences, 9–15. Zagreb: University of Zagreb. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/299373057.pdf.
ANRI. (2011). “Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Kearsipan Di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi.”
Bawono, H. (2017). “Simplifikasi Ke-Arsip-an (Elektronik): Akar Terseoknya Kearsipan Indonesia Dalam Belantara E-Government.” In Diskursus Kearsipan Indonesia: Sebuah Bunga Rampai, 1–76. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Bearman, D. (1993). “Record-Keeping Systems.” Archivaria 36 (Autumn 1993): 16–36. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11932/12886.
Berner, J. S., & Boel. (2003). “Constructing Risk and Safety in Technological Practice: An Introduction.” In Constructing Risk and Safety in Technological Practice. London: Routledge.
Borglund, E. (2006). “A Predictive Model for Attaining Quality in Recordkeeping.” Mid Sweden University.
BPKP. (2018). “Pedoman Pengawasan Intern Berbasis Risiko.”
Cook, T. (2007). “Electronic Records , Paper Minds : The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial.” Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 1 (0): 399–443. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/815d/a1b4f15de9611accdf364d72df74024e527b.pdf.
CRMSIndonesia. (2019). “Survei Nasional Manajemen Risiko 2019.” Jakarta. https://crmsindonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CRMS-Indonesia-Survei-Nasional-Manajemen-Risiko-2019.pdf.
Duranti, L. (2001). “Concepts , Principles , and Methods for the Management of Electronic Records.” The Information Society 17 (4): 271–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722401753330869.
Duranti, L., & Blanchette, J. (2004). “The Authenticity of Electronic Records : The InterPARES Approach.” Vancouver.
Egbuji, A. (1999). “Risk Management of Organisational Records.” Records Management Journal 9 (2): 93–116.
IronMountain. (2015). “A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR A RECORDS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT RISK & CONTROL FRAMEWORK.” Boston.
ISO. (2014). “ISO/TR 18128 Concerning Risk Assessment for Records Processes and Systems.” Switzerland: ISO.
ISO. 2016. “ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and Documentation-Records Management-Part 1: Concepts and Principles.” Geneva: ISO.
Katuu, S. (2012). “Enterprise Content Management ( ECM ) Implementation in South Africa.” Records Management Journal 22 (1): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211222081.
Katuu, S. (2016). “Managing Digital Records in a Global Environment: A Review of the Landscape of International Standards and Good Practice Guidelines.” The Electronic Library 34 (5): 869–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2015-0064.
KemenPANRB. (2019). “SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN BERBASIS ELEKTRONIK (SPBE).”
PARBICA. (2004). “GUIDELINE 18: Digital Preservation.”
Rogers, C. (2015). “Authenticity of Digital Records in Practice.” In 2015 Digital Heritage, 7–10. Granada: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7419532.
Woodal, A. B., & Philip, J. W. (2014). Total Information Risk Management: Maximizing the Value of Data. Massachuset: Elsevier.
Informant A, Interview by Harry Bawono. (2019). Electronic Records Management in ExxonMobil (April 8-12).
Informant N, Interview by Harry Bawono. (2019). Risk Management Frameworks in Government Agencies (May 23).
Informant F, Interview by Harry Bawono. (2019). Risk Management and Information Security (November 5).
By submitting your manuscript to our journal, you are following Copyright and License