Intervensi Bibliometrik terhadap Artikel Saintifik Topik Kesehatan Kawasan Indonesia
Abstract
Kesehatan adalah modal penting untuk mewujudkan pembangunan berkelanjutan sehingga bidang ilmunya penting untuk ditingkatkan. ScienceDirect menjadi media berkelas bagi ilmu kesehatan dan oleh sebab itu keberadaannya menarik diungkap. Kajian ini bertujuan, 1) menganalisis artikel ilmiah topik kesehatan yang mengangkat isu-isu di Indonesia tahun 2006-2015. Untuk menganalisisnya dilibatkan bibliometrik guna mengetahui jurnal penampung dan produktivitasnya, 2) arsitektur dan rasio kolaborasi, dan 3) kontributor termasuk zona geografisnya. Diperoleh 146 artikel yang terdistribusi ke dalam 66 jurnal ilmiah. Melihat pertumbuhannya selama tiga tahun terakhir, jumlah artikel beserta kontributornya konsisten mengalami peningkatan. Satu hingga empat lebih formasi menjadi ciri khas dalam pemroduksian artikel dan kebanyakan ditempuh secara berkolaborasi. Kedua indeks kolaborasi yakni penulis dan institusi menunjukan rasio multipel lebih, kecuali negara meskipun indikasinya kuat mendekati. Pelibatan kekuatan lokal sebesar 41.12% dimana Universitas Indonesia terdepan diantara 107 afiliasi. Posisi Indonesia meraih terbaik dengan prestasi 45.89% dan mengindikasikan kemandirian dalam mengatasi problem kesehatannya sendiri. Menurut bingkai geografis lainnya terdapat 6 regional dan 4 benua.
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze scientific articles on health topics that address issues in Indonesia in 2006-2015. To analyze it involved bibliometrics in order to know the collection journal and its productivity, (2) architecture and collaboration ratio, and (3) contributors including the geographic zone. The result for a decade obtained 146 articles distributed into 66 scientific journals. Looking at its growth over the past three years, the number of articles and its contributors has consistently improved. One to four more formations are characteristic of article production and most are collaborated. Both collaboration indexes are authors and institutions show more multiplier ratios, with the exception of the country despite strong indications of approaching. The involvement of national power is 41.12% where University of Indonesia is ahead of 107 affiliates. The position of Indonesia achieved the best with 45.89% achievement and indicated independence in overcoming its own health problems. According to other geographical frames there are 6 regional and 4 continents. Thus health issues in Indonesia have been viewed as a common problem with a wide spectrum. This review is useful to raise the interest of Indonesian authors in discussing health issues in their area
Downloads
References
Beaver, D. d. (2013). The many faces of collaboration and teamwork in scientific research: updated reflections on scientific collaboration. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(1), 45-54. doi:10.1080/09737766.2013.802629
Cao, Y., Zhou, S., & Wang, G. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of global laparoscopy research trends during 1997–2011. Scientometrics, 96(3), 717-730. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0942-z
Chen, H., & Ho, Y.-S. (2015). Highly cited articles in biomass research: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49(September), 12-20. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.060
Dragos, C. M., & Dragos, S. L. (2013). Bibliometric approach of factors affecting scientific productivity in environmental sciences and ecology. Science of The Total Environment, 449(April), 184-188. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.057
Elsevier. (2016). Scopus content coverage guide. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0007/69451/scopus_content_coverage_guide.pdf
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323-335. doi:10.1002/asi.21688
Gonzalez-Alcaide, G., Park, J., Huamani, C., Gascon, J., & Ramos, J. M. (2012). Scientific authorships and collaboration network analysis on Chagas disease: Papers indexed in Pubmed (1940-2009). Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 54(4), 219-228. doi:10.1590/S0036-46652012000400007
Gotting, M., Schwarzer, M., Gerber, A., Klingelhofer, D., & Groneberg, D. A. (2017). Pulmonary hypertension: Scientometric analysis and density-equalizing mapping. PLoS ONE, 12(1), 1-17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169238
Gul, S., Nisa, N. T., Shah, T. A., Shah, M. U., & Wani, A. B. (2015). Research output on Lavender, 2008-2012. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 7(5), 460-466. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2015.05.004
Guo, L., Xu, F., Feng, Z., & Zhang, G. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of oyster research from 1991 to 2014. Aquaculture International, 24(1), 327-344. doi:10.1007/s10499-015-9928-1
Hassan, S.-U., Haddawy, P., Kuinkel, P., Degelsegger, A., & Blasy, C. (2012). A bibliometric study of research activity in ASEAN related to the EU in FP7 priority areas. Scientometrics, 91(3), 1035-1051. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0665-1
Ho, Y.-S., Siu, E., & Chuang, K.-Y. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of dengue-related publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Future Virology, 11(9), 631-648. doi:10.2217/fvl-2016-0057
Hoppen, N. H., & Vanz, S. A. (2016). Neurosciences in Brazil: a bibliometric study of main characteristics, collaboration and citations. Scientometrics, 109(1), 121-141. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1919-0
Ivanovic, D., Fu, H.-Z., & Ho, Y.-S. (2015). Publications from Serbia in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(1), 145-160. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1664-9
Jain, S., P., B., Singla, A., Singh, K., Kundu, H., Vashishtha, V., . . . Malhi, R. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of journal of clinical and diagnostic research (dentistry section; 2007-2014). Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9(4), 47-51. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/11994.5834
Kolle, S. R., & Thyavanahalli, S. H. (2016). Global research on air pollution between 2005 and 2014: a bibliometric study. Collection Building, 35(3), 84-92. doi:10.1108/CB-05-2016-0008
Lakitan, B., Hidayat, D., & Herlinda, S. (2012). Scientific productivity and the collaboration intensity of Indonesian universities and public R&D institutions: Are there dependencies on collaborative R&D with foreign institutions? Technology in Society, 34(2), 227-238. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.06.001
Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2012). Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: A comparative study of collaborative measures. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 27-33. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.09.003
Lin, C.-S., Huang, M.-H., & Chen, D.-Z. (2013). The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 611-621. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.007
Lorenzo, G., Lledo, A., Pomares, J., Roig, R., & Arnaiz, P. (2016). Bibliometric indicators in the study of Asperger syndrome between 1990 and 2014. Scientometrics, 109(1), 377-388. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1975-5
Mallik, A., & Mandal, N. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of global publication output and collaboration structure study in microRNA research. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2011-2037. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1128-z
Martinez-Gomez, A. (2015). Bibliometrics as a tool to map uncharted territory: A study on non-professional interpreting. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 23(2), 205-222. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2015.1010550
Maryono, & Junandi, S. (2012). Indonesian Journal of Chemistry 2007-2011: Analisis kolaborasi dan institusi. Visi Pustaka, 14(3), 13-23.
Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Bornmann, L., & Moed, H. F. (2013). The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach. Scientometrics, 97(2), 421-434. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1046-0
Nashihuddin, W., & Rahayu, R. N. (2013). Aksesibilitas informasi ilmiah Science Direct Pustaka Ristek di lingkungan Ristek dan LPNK. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia, 12(2), 1-9. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/11493/8988
Nasir, S., Ahmed, J., Asrar, M., & Gilani, A.-H. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of pharmacy/pharmacology research in Pakistan. International Journal of Pharmacology, 11(7), 766-772. doi:10.3923/ijp.2015.766.772
Natakusumah, E. K. (2014). Penentuan kolaborasi penelitian dan distribusi pengarang pada Jurnal Teknologi Indonesia. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 35(1), 15-24. Retrieved from http://jurnalbaca.pdii.lipi.go.id/index.php/baca/article/view/183
Nusantari, D. D., Saleh, A. R., & Yusalina. (2013). Analisis pemanfaatan jurnal online Sciencedirect di perpustakaan IPB (Studi kasus pada mahasiswa pascasarjana IPB). Visi Pustaka, 15(2), 89-95. Retrieved from http://www.perpusnas.go.id/?magazine_category=visi-pustaka
Pattah, S. H. (2013). Pemanfaatan kajian bibliometrika sebagai metode evaluasi dan kajian dalam ilmu perpustakaan dan informasi. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan Khizanah Al-Hikmah, 1(1), 47-57. Retrieved from http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/khizanah-al-hikmah/ article/view/25
Pendlebury, D. A. (2008). Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating Research. Philadelphia, PA: Research Department, Thomson Scientific. Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/media/mtrp/ UsingBibliometricsinEval_WP.pdf
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
Pinto, M., Escalona-Fernandez, M. I., & Pulgarín, A. (2013). Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: a bibliometric study (1974–2011). Scientometrics, 95(3), 1071-1094. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0899-y
Rahayu, R. N. (2013). Profil Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Ilmiah. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia, 12(1), 29-31. Retrieved from http://jurnal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/viewFile/11435/8944
Rahman, M. T., Regenstein, J. M., Kassim, N. L., & Haque, N. (2017). The need to quantify authors’ relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 275-281. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.002
Rousseau, R. (2011). Comments on the modified collaborative coefficient. Scientometrics, 87(1), 171-174. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0300-y
Rufaidah, V. W., & Widaningsih. (2012). Akses pemustaka ke jurnal online di Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, 21(1), 15-22. Retrieved from http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/jpp/issue/view/164
Sangam, S., & Arali, U. (2016). Growth versus scientific collaboration in the field of genetics: A scientometrics analysis. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 10(1), 9-19. doi:10.1080/09737766.2016.1177938
Santhanakarthikeyan, S., Grace, M., & Jeyshankar, R. (2014). Research publications to Indian Journal of Cancer: A scientometric analysis. Library Hi Tech News, 31(3), 21-25. doi:10.1108/LHTN-11-2013-0068
SCImago. (2016). SJR - SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com
Shari, S., Haddow, G., & Genoni, P. (2012). Bibliometric and webometric methods for assessing research collaboration. Library Review, 61(8/9), 592-607. doi:10.1108/00242531211292097
Singh, N. (2016). Scientometric analysis of research on Zika virus. VirusDisease, 27(3), 303-306. doi:10.1007/s13337-016-0339-3
Singh, N., Handa, T. S., Kumar, D., & Singh, G. (2016). Mapping of breast cancer research in India: A bibliometric analysis. Current Science, 110(7), 1178-1183. Retrieved from http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/110/07/1178.pdf
Snaith, B. A. (2013). An evaluation of author productivity in international radiography journals 2004–2011. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 60(3), 93-99. doi:10.1002/jmrs.21
Snaith, B. A. (2013). Peer-Review publication patterns: A comparison of International Radiography Journals. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 44(1), 37-43. doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2012.11.003
Surjandari, I., Dhini, A., Lumbantobing, E. W., Widari, A. T., & Prawiradinata, I. (2015). Big Data Analysis of Indonesian Scholars’ Publications: A Research Theme Mapping. International Journal of Technology, 6(4), 650-658. doi:10.14716/ijtech.v6i4.1956
Terekhov, A. I. (2017). Bibliometric spectroscopy of Russia’s nanotechnology: 2000-2014. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1217-1242. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2234-5
Thompson Reuters. (2008). Using bibliometrics: a guide to evaluating research performance with citation data. Retrieved from http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf
United Nations - Statistics Division. (2011). Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49): Geographic Regions. United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
Vanni, T., Mesa-Frias, M., Sanchez-Garcia, R., Roesler, R., Schwartsmann, G., Goldani, M. Z., & Foss, A. M. (2014). International scientific collaboration in HIV and HPV: A network analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(3), 1-9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093376
Wei, M., Wang, W., & Zhuang, Y. (2016). Worldwide research productivity in the field of spine surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis. European Spine Journal, 25(4), 976-982. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4442-3
Wiles, L., Olds, T., & Williams, M. (2013). Twenty-five years of Australian nursing and allied health professional journals: bibliometric analysis from 1985 through 2010. Scientometrics, 94(1), 359-378. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0704-y
Zhang, L., Ye, P., & Liu, Q. (2011). A survey of the use of electronic resources at seven universities in Wuhan, China. Program, 45(1), 67-77. doi:10.1108/00330331111107402
Zhang, L., Ye, P., Liu, Q., & Rao, L. (2011). Survey on the utilization of NSTL electronic resources in colleges and universities in Wuhan, China. The Electronic Library, 29(6), 828-840. doi:10.1108/02640471111188042
Zheng, J., Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, M.-h., & Chen, D.-z. (2014). Influences of counting methods on country rankings: a perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2087-2102. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1139-9
Zhou, X., & Zhao, G. (2015). Global liposome research in the period of 1995-2014: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(1), 231-248. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1659-6
By submitting your manuscript to our journal, you are following Copyright and License