Analisis Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Tentang Tindakan Aparat Negara Melakukan Spionase Terhadap Warga Negara
Abstract
This article aims to describe and analyze differences of opinion from the two legal bases, namely Islamic law and positive law regarding espionage by citizens against citizens. In answering the problems above, the author uses Library Research which is guided by the management of data obtained from several literatures. The sources of data obtained include secondary, primary and tertiary data. This research approach using a qualitative approach is something that is based on a literature study by exploring scientific works that are directly related to the object being studied and analyzing in the literature that has relevance to the problem discussed, then reviewing and then concluding. The results of this study indicate that there are differences and similarities in the views of Islamic law and positive law regarding the actions of state officials against citizens. In this paper, the opinion of Islamic law views that espionage carried out by state officials can be carried out if it is aimed at the interests of the State and Muslims. As the Prophet gave an example by sending trusted companions to spy on infidels and hypocrites who could endanger the security of Muslims at that time. However, apart from that, Islam strictly prohibits any spying if it is carried out on Muslims themselves, especially if the spying is groundless or only for personal gain as stated in the QS. Al-Hujurat paragraph 12. Then in positive law views that espionage may be carried out if the actions of the person who is the subject of spying has taken actions that are considered to violate the rules with sufficient preliminary evidence as regulated in the law relating to the permissibility of espionage. Outside of what is regulated in the law, espionage cannot be carried out because it violates a person's right to privacy as regulated in Law number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions
References
Ali, Masyhar. 2009. Gaya Indonesia Menghadang Terorisme. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Asmawi, Nur Ilma, and Muammar Bakry. “Kebebasan Perempuan Dalam Memilih Calon Suami; Studi Perbandingan Antara Mazhab Syafi’i Dan Hanafi.” Mazahibuna; Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 2 (2020): 212–29. http://103.55.216.56/index.php/mjpm/article/view/17817.
Bakry, Muammar, Abdul Syatar, Achmad Abubakar, Chaerul Risal, Ahmad Ahmad, and Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin. “Strengthening the Cyber Terrorism Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Assimilation from Islamic Jurisdiction.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10 (2021): 1267–1276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.146.
Bakry, Muammar, Abdul Syatar, Islamul Haq, Chaerul Mundzir, Muhammad Arif, and Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin. “Arguing Islamophobia during COVID-19 Outbreaks: A Consideration Using Khuṣūṣ Al-Balwᾱ.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9, no. Desember (2020): 2757–65. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.340.
Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada. 2005..
Departemen Agama RI, Wakaf Tunai Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (Jakarta: Departement Agama RI, 2005
Diriwayatkan oleh Al-Bukhari hadits no. 6064 dan Muslim hadits no. 256
Heariej, Eddy. O. S. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga. 2012.
Jamal, Fauzun. Intelijen Nabi: Melacak Jaringan Intelijen Militer dan Sipil Pada Masa Rasulullah. Bandung: Pustaka Oasis. 2009.
Konsideran Menimbang dalam UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 dan UU No. 20 tahun 2001
Kristian dan Yopi Gunawan. Sekelumit tentang Penyadapan dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia. 2013.
Kurniati Kurniati. “PEREMPUAN DAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA: Diskursus HAM Dalam Karya Nawal Sa’dawi Kurniati.” Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 8, no. Vol 8, No 1 (2019) (2019): 52–61. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/al_daulah/article/view/7984/pdf.
Munawwir, Ahmad, Warson. 1997, Kamus Al-Munawwir. Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif.
Naro, Wahyuddin, Abdul Syatar, Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin, Islamul Haq, Achmad Abubakar, and Chaerul Risal. “Shariah Assessment Toward the Prosecution of Cybercrime in Indonesia.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9 (2020): 572–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.5.
Nawawi, Arief. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Grup. 2008.
Syatar, Abdul. “Relevansi Antara Pemidanaan Indonesia Dan Sanksi Pidana Islam.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 16, no. 1, Juli (2018): 118–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28988/diktum.v16i1.525.
Syatar, Abdul, and Chaerul Mundzir. TOKOH DAN KETOKOHAN IMAM MAZHAB (Kontribusinya Terhadap Pengembangan Fikih Di Indonesia). Gowa: Alauddin University Press, 2021.
Taqiyyuddin al-Nabhani, al-Syakhshiyyah al-Islaamiyyah, juz II, ed.III (Beirut: Daar al-Ummah, 1994
Teguh, Prasetyo. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo. 2012.
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2011 Tentang Badang Intelijen Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2011 Tentang Badan Intelijen Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Copyright (c) 2022 Asrudi, Zulhas'ari Mustafa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
