Medical Malpractice in the Perspective of Hadith Narrated by Abu Dawud and Article 58 of Law No. 36 of 2009
Comparative Study
Abstract
Malpractice is basically a social phenomenon so that it attracts a lot of public attention, not only among doctors but also human rights activists. Because malpractice in the world of medicine affects humans, physical losses and victims' property. The legal system in Indonesia does not yet have definite provisions regarding this case, so judges tend to use ordinary procedural law as a guideline. The purpose of the author in writing this article is as follows: 1) To find out how the perspective of hadith on medical malpractice. 2) To find out how the application of criminal law in Indonesia against medical malpractice. The research method that the authors use in this article is a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis techniques. The results of the research show that the hadith HR. Abu Dawud has the same meaning, that is, doctors or medical personnel must be held responsible for the mistakes they have made, because of the patient's losses, both physically, spiritually and psychologically. The government regulates health in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health which was previously Law No. 23 of 1992. So patients who suffer losses can report the doctor or medical personnel through the Doctors Association organization in Indonesia or the existing Medical Discipline Honorary Council. in Indonesia (MKDKI) or the Medical Ethics Honorary Council and can also go through the High Court if it is in the form of a crime by including evidence of being a victim of medical malpractice.
References
Afwadzi, Benny, and Nur Alifah. “Malpraktek Dan Hadis Nabi: Menggali Pesan Kemanusian Nabi Muhammad Saw. Dalam Bidang Medis.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v3i1.772.
Agustina, Bunga. “Kewenangan Pemerintah Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Pelayanan Kesehatan Tradisional Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 32, no. 1 (2016): 82. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v32i1.91.
Akuntansi, Program Studi. “1* , 2 1,2” 20, no. 1 (2022): 105–23.
Arifin, Tajul. “Antropologi Hukum Islam,” 2016.
———. “Ulumul Hadits,” 2014.
Aryani, Fitri Nur, and Antonia Intarti. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Atas Malpraktik Oleh Tenaga Medis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktik Kedokteran.” Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 1 (2019): 51–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v18i1.66.
Asmara, Alexander Budisectio, Ardiansyah Ardiansyah, and Yetti Yetti. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Dokter Terhadap Tindakan Medis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan Dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Kuhp).” Journal of Science and Social Research 5, no. 3 (2022): 609. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v5i3.999.
Dwi Dananjaya, A A Ngr, A A Sagung, Laksmi Dewi, Dan Luh, and Putu Suryani. “Sanksi Malpraktik Dan Resiko Medik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Dokter.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 6–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.1.1.2019.6-10.
Federspiel, Tajul Arifin, and R.T. Hidayat. “Kajian Al-Qur’an Di Indonesia: Dari Mahmud Yumus Hingga Quraish Shihab,” 1996.
Handoyo, Budi. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Malpraktik Dokter Pada Pelayanan Kesehatan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana.” AT-TASYRI’: JURNAL ILMIAH PRODI MUAMALAH 12, no. 1 (2020): 47–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47498/tasyri.v12i01.360.
Heryanto, Bambang. “Physician Malpractice in Legal Perspective.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 10, no. 2 (2010): 183–91.
Lago, Yuber, Yuni Priskila Ginting, and Fajar Sugianto. “Dilema Keadilan Hukum Antara Hukum Tidak Tertulis Yang Hidup (Ongeschreven Recht) Dan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Filo-Sofis.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 1 (2023): 71–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v19i1.7310.
Nurani, Sifa Mulya, and Tajul Arifin. “Conflict Resolution on Violence Behavior in Yogyakarta.” MUHARRIK: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Sosial 4, no. 02 (2021): 427–40. https://doi.org/10.37680/muharrik.v4i02.1049.
Nurdin, M. “KEDOKTERAN” 10, no. 1 (2015): 92–109.
Putra, Ngurah Nandha Rama, and I Gusti Ngurah Dharma Laksana. “Aspek Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dokter Yang Melakukan Tindakan Malpraktek Medis.” Journal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 3 (2019): 1–16.
Rana, Mohamad, and Tajul Arifin. “CIREBON PERSPEKTIF YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS” 7, no. 1 (2022): 1–16.
Razy, F. & Saputera, Y. “Tinjauan Yuridis Malpraktek Medis Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah 1, no. 3 (2022): 1–10.
Sibarani, Sabungan. “Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Pasien Korban Malpraktik Dilihat Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Di Indonesia.” Justitia et Pax 33, no. 1 (2017): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v33i1.1417.
Siti, Eriska Kurnianti, Ngurah Wirasila, and Sagung Putri. “Hukum Pidana Dan Undang-Undang Praktek Kedokteran Dalam Penanganan Malpraktek.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2017, 1–15.
Witro, Doli, Zufriani, Tajul Arifin, and Mohamad Athoillah. “Anthropology of Islamic Law as an Approach in the Practice of Buying and Selling Online.” Qawãnïn Journal of Economic Syaria Law 6, no. 1 (2022): 36–52. https://doi.org/10.30762/qawanin.v6i1.18.
Copyright (c) 2024 Eva Savariah, Tajul Arifin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
