Penggantian Biaya Pemanggilan Saksi Berdasarkan Pasal 229 KUHAP di Kabupaten Gowa
Perspektif Hukum Islam
Abstract
The subject matter of this study is the Islamic Law view on Reimbursement of Witness Costs in Fulfilling Summons Based on Article 229 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Gowa District from an Islamic legal perspective. The type of research used in this study is a type of qualitative descriptive field research, as for the approach used, normative juridical and normative theological approaches, then the primary data sources are interviews conducted at the Gowa Police Station, the Gowa Prosecutor's Office and the community who have been witnesses in solving cases in Gowa district. Both secondary data sources are sourced from books, journals, and other sources related to this research. Data collection methods carried out, namely observation, interviews, documentation and literature studies. The results of the research obtained are that the reimbursement of witness summoning costs in Gowa district has not been carried out in accordance with what is stipulated in Article 229 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The inhibiting factors are because the budget items given each year only increase by a few percent while the increase in the number of cases that occur and those reported soar every year, and causes the reimbursement of witness summoning costs has not been optimally applied. In Islamic law, the reimbursement of the cost of summoning witnesses is not specifically regulated but in the Qur'an is equated with the granting of the right to all to create justice for human beings.
References
Abdullah, M Zen. “Urgensi Perlunya Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Nasional Di Indonesia Yang Lebih Responsif.” Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi 20, no. 1 (2020): 281–87. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v20i1.885.
Afifah, Wiwik, and Gusrin Lessy. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Saksi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v10i20.358.
Aisyah, Aisyah, Azharuddin Azharuddin, Said Rizal, and Suhaila Zulkifli. “Studi Perbandingan Alat Bukti Saksi Dalam KUHAP Dan KUHAP Islam.” Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Dan Kenegaraan 1, no. 1 (2022): 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i1.1338.
Anshoruddin. Hukum Pembuktian Menurut Hukum Acara Islam Dan Hukum Positif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
Asmawi, Nur Ilma, and Muammar Bakry. “Kebebasan Perempuan Dalam Memilih Calon Suami; Studi Perbandingan Antara Mazhab Syafi’i Dan Hanafi.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 2 (December 17, 2020): 212–29. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V2I2.17817.
Basri, Halimah. “Kesaksian Perempuan Dalam Kontrak Keuangan Dalam Kitab-Kitab Tafsir.” Jurnal Al-Daulah 7, no. 2 (2018): 347–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v7i2.7247.
Eato, Yurina Ningsi. “Keabsahan Alat Bukti Dan Barang Bukti Pada Perkara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 2 (2017): 75–82. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15346.
Gumeleng, Fabritio. “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Putisan Hakim Dalam Suatu Perkara Pidana Ditinjau Dari Pasal 183 KUHAP.” LEX PRIVATUM 10, no. 4 (2022): 1–15. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/42404.
Haq, Islamul, Wahidin Wahidin, and Saidah Saidah. “Melampaui Batas (Noodewwr Exces) Dalam Membela Diri; Studi Perbandingan Antara Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 1 (June 2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V2I1.14295.
Hasan, Hamzah. “Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Kewajiban Asasi Manusia; Telaah Hukum Pidana Islam.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 1, no. 2 (2019): 92–118. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V1I2.11650.
Kementerian Agama. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Edisi 2019. Jakarta: Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an Balitbang Diklat Kemenag RI, 2019.
Kurniati. Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Makassar: Alauddin University Press, 2011.
Muhammad bin Isma’il Abu ‘Abdillah al-Bukhari al-Ju’fi. “Sahih Bukhari.” In Juz VIII, edited by Cet. I; t.tp. Dar al-Thauq al-Najah, n.d.
Nugroho, Bastianto. “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP.” Yuridika 32, no. 1 (2017): 17–36. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780.
Purba, Lisa Purba Hajini, S Sumiadi, and Y Yusrizal. “Penggantian Biaya Kepada Sakso Atau Ahli Dalam Rangka Memberikan Keterangan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Studi Penelitian Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon).” REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2021): 128–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v8i2.3865.
Rafid. A, Noercholis. “Analisis Sadd Dzariah Terhadap Dispensasi Nikah Pada Putusan Pengadilan Agama Parepare.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 18, no. 2 (2020): 213–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v18i2.1315.
Rahman, Arif, Sofyan, and Mulham Jaki Asti. “Hakim Peradilan Agama: Refleksi Sistem Pengangkatan Dan Pelaksana Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 20, no. 1 (2022): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.35905/DIKTUM.V20I1.2780.
Rasyid, Arbanur. “Kesaksian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial 6, no. 1 (2020): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v6i1.2442.
Saidah, Saidah, and Abdul Syatar. “Al-Daruriyat Al Khams Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian.” Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 14, no. 1 (2020): 121–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v14i1.510.
Septimaulina, Rizki, Suhaimi Suhaimi, and Mujibussalim Mujibussalim. “Pelaksanaan Hak Saksi/Ahli Mendapatkan Penggantian Biaya.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 2, no. 1 (2018): 89–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v2i1.10589.
Shihab M. Quraish. “Tafsir Al-Misbah (Pesan, Kesan, Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an.” In Volume 3. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2012.
Soeroso, R. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Suryani, Nova Ardianti. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak.” Media of Law and Sharia 2, no. 2 (2021): 134–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v2i2.11493.
Syatar, Abdul. “Relevansi Antara Pemidanaan Indonesia Dan Sanksi Pidana.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 16, no. 1 (2018): 118–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v16i1.525.
Talli, Abd. Halim. Peradilan Islam Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Cet. I. Makassar: Alauddin University Press, 2011.
Waluyo, Bambang. Viktimologi Perlindungan Korban & Saksi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2023 Nur Azizah, Nurul Mujahidah, Muhammad Safaat Gunawan, Sofyan Sofyan, Muh Alyan Mulya A
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
