Juridical Analysis of the Probative Strength of Visum et Repertum in the Crime of Persecution
Study of Case Decision Number 78/Pid.B/2023/PN. Bta
Abstract
Visum Et Repertum is a valid evidence tool that has a very important role and power in the trial of criminal cases, especially in criminal cases where the object is the human body, in addition to simplifying the evidentiary process, it can also convince the judge in deciding a case. This research method uses normative juridical research approaches, legislation, conceptual approaches, and case approaches. The results of the study show that the judge in deciding the case went through several considerations, namely considerations with several pieces of evidence submitted by the public prosecutor as well as incriminating considerations and mitigating considerations for the defendant. In the verdict, the Defendant SA als Aan Bin RC was found guilty of his actions, namely deliberately persecuting the witness MA Bin MY. The defendant received a sanction, namely imprisonment for 2 (two) years and 3 (three) months.
References
Ali, Ismail, Junardi, and Andi Sulfiati. “Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.” Journal of Law 2, no. 1 (2023): 43–55.
Hs, Jl, Ronggo Waluyo, Kec Telukjambe Timur, and Jawa Barat. “KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM DALAM PROSES PIDANA Mas Dhanis Taufiqurrahman Suhardianto , Muhammad Rusli Arafat Fakultas Hukum , Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang A . PENDAHULUAN Pemeriksaan Terhadap Perkara Pidana Dilakukan Oleh Aparat Penegak” 7, no. 1 (2022): 83–94.
Ip, Hariyani, and M Susanti. “Penulisan Derajat Luka Pada Visum Et Repertum .” Baiturrahmah Medical Journal 1, no. 2 (2021): 72–76.
Kadir, Abdul. “Relevansi Alat Bukti Informasi Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Replik 6, no. 2 (2018): 152–65.
Nugroho, Bastianto. “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut Kuhap.” Yuridika 32, no. 1 (2017): 17. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780.
Ohoiwutun, Triana. Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik. Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya, 2016.
Olongsongke, Richard. “Kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Proses Pra Penuntutan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Et Societatis 3, no. 9 (2015): 101–8.
Purnama, Handi, Sriwidodo Sriwidodo, and Soraya Ratnawulan. “Review Sistematik : Proses Penyembuhan Dan Perawatan Luka.” Jurnal Farmaka 15, no. 2 (2017): 251–56.
Ratnasari, Dwi, Muhammad Sabir Rahman, and Bakhtiar Tijjang. “Penanganan Tindak Pidana Desersi Anggota TNI-AD Yang Ditangani Oleh Polisi Militer.” Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 9, no. 4 (2022): 278–82.
Saputra, Rian Prayudi. “Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pahlawan 2, no. 2 (2019): 45–52.
Sudewo, Fajar Ari. Penologi Dan Teori Pemidanaan. Edited by Fajar Ari Sudewo. PT. Djava Sinar Perkasa. Pertama. Tegal: PT. Djava Sinar Perkasa, 2022.
Sumakul, Tommy F, and Veibe V Sumilat. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Menurut Pasal 351 Ayat (3) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Lex Crimen 10, no. 9 (2021): 57–65.
Yanova, Muhammad hendri, Parman Komarudin, and Hendra Hadi. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Analisis Problematika Hukum Dengan Metode Penelitian Normatif Dan Empiris.” Badamai Law Journal 8, no. 2 (2023): 394–408.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Baturaja Nomor 78/Pid.B/2023/PN.Bta
