Legal Review of Dentist Services that Exceed its Authority
Analysis of the Minister of Health Regulation Number 39 of 2014
Abstract
Dental artisan is a dentist's specialty. The large number of dental artisan who do not follow the health benchmarks set out in Minister of Health Regulation Number 39 of 2014 makes it seem as if the norms created are meaningless. In fact, there are quite a few cases where dental artisan carry out fixed braces treatment on their patients. This research will discuss the legal regulation of dental artisan that exceed their authority in terms of Minister of Health Regulation No. 39 of 2014. The aim of this research is to find out the legal regulations regarding permits to practice dental artisan in Indonesia based on Minister of Health Regulation Number 39 of 2014 and to find out legal sanctions for providers of dental artisan who exceed their authority. In completing this research, the method used was the normative juridical method. The study results show that dentists based on Minister of Health Regulation no. 39/2014 is only allowed to make and install partial and/or full removable dentures using heat curing acrylic material. The sanctions that can be imposed on dentists who exceed their authority can be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of a written warning, temporary or permanent license revocation.
References
Berdaretta Gomgom Simanjuntak, “Dentist's Wetness Regarding Constitutional Court Decision Number 40/PUU-X/2012 Regarding Application for Review of the Medical Practice Law Against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia”. Novum: Jurnal Hukum 1 No.3 (2014), Hal. 1-11.
Dicky Nur Oktaviano Rizafaza and Yovita Arie Mangesti, “Legal Protection for Dental Service Users Against Alleged Malpractice”. Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 2 No. 3 (2022), Hal. 660-674.
Dr. dr. Rospita Adelina, “Hukum Kesehatan”, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika (2023), Hal. 1-171.
I Made Ari Yudistira, I Nyoman Putu Yudiartha, and I Made Widyantara, “Legal Protection for Consumers for Dental Malpractice Services”. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 2, No.2 (2021), Hal. 265-670.
I Putu Wahyu Weda Gunawan and I Ketut Sudiarta, “Criminal Liability of Dental Experts in Committing Malpractice in the Perspective of the Criminal Code and Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health”. Jurnal Kertha Wicara (2015), hal. 1-5.
Muhammad Syahri Ramadhan, “Implementasi Asas Hukum Perjanjian Terapeutik dan Informed Consent”, Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum (2021), Hal. 32-49.
Zaeni Ashyidie, “Aspek-Aspek Hukum Kesehatan Di Indonesia”, Depok : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada (2017), Hal. 5.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan
Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktik Kedokteran
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 39 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pembinaan, Pengawasan, dan Perizinan Pekerjaan Tukang Gigi
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 339/MENKES/PER/V/1989 Tentang Pencabutan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 53/DPK/I/K1969 Tentang Pendaftaran dan Pemberian Izin Menjalankan Pekerjaan Tukang Gigi
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 1871/MENKES/PER/IX/2011 Tentang Pencabutan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 339/MENKES/PER/V/1989 Tentang Pekerjaan Tukang Gigi
Sehat Negeriku, “Kemenkes Tidak Terbitkan Izin Baru Bagi Tukang Gigi Sejak 23 Tahun Lalu”, diakses dari https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/rilis-media/20120319/523135/kemenkes-tidak-terbitkan-izin-baru-bagi-tukang-gigi-sejak-23-tahunlalu/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CJadi%2C%20Permenkes%20No.%201871,%E2%80%9D%2C%20jelas%20dr.%20Dedi
PPID Kota Yogyakarta, “Wewenang”, diakses dari https://weborganisasi.jogjakota.go.id/page/index/wewenang pada tanggal 24 April 2024 Pukul 12.21
