Analysis of the Implementation and Learning Activities of Students Using the Inquiry Cycle Learning Model Assisted by Javalab
Abstract
This study aimed to understand the implementation and learning activities of students after the implementation of the inquiry cycle learning model assisted by JavaLab. This research used an observational research design by involving 32 students 7th grade. Data collection technique used Stallings snapshot observation. Then, data were analyzed using the results of learning implementation and the percentage of learning activities. Based on the results of data analysis, it showed that the implementation of learning with the inquiry cycle learning model assisted by JavaLab was carried out in all phases and obtained a percentage of learning activities with more dominant active instructions. Students actively participate in the learning process through discussions, practice or drills, and assignments. Based on this explanation, although there are limitations, it can be concluded that the application of the inquiry cycle learning model assisted by JavaLab has a good impact on student learning activities in the implementation of learning.
Downloads
References
C. B. da S. Clarindo, S. Miller, and É. C. Kohle, “Learning activity as a means of developing theoretical thinking capacities,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. 603753, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603753.
A. J. P. Sierra, A. E. G. Valdez, A. B. S. Oms, A. M. M. Fabregas, and Y. P. Herrera, “Impact of science and innovation to improve the teaching-learning process,” J. Pendidik. Jasmani, Olahraga dan Kesehat. Undiksha, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 80–94, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jjp.v10i2.46697.
I. B. N. Mantra, I. A. M. S. Widiastuti, I. N. Suparsa, and N. D. Handayani, “Teaching and learning strategies practiced by language teachers to actively engage their students in learning,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Sustain. Dev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 15–21, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/IJASSD/article/view/1199
D. Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė and I. Mereckaitė-Kušleikė, “Conditions for successful learning of primary school pupils in the context of integrated education: A case study,” Interchange, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 229–251, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10780-023-09489-5.
I. W. Zebua, “The effect of cooperative learning model type group investigation on student learning outcomes in magnitude and measurement subject,” Asian J. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2023, doi: 10.24815/ajse.v5i1.28251.
Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 033/H/KR/2022 tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Indonesia, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-merdeka/rujukan
D. K. Fitra, “Analisis penerapan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi dalam Kurikulum Merdeka pada materi Tata Surya di kelas VII SMP,” Tunjuk Ajar J. Penelit. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 278, 2022, doi: 10.31258/jta.v5i2.278-290.
I. G. Sujana, “Meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA melalui penerapan metode inkuiri terbimbing,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 514, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jear.v4i4.28651.
A. Djamaluddin and Wardana, Belajar dan pembelajaran. CV Kaaffah Learning Center, 2019.
D. Schwarzer and C. Luke, “Inquiry cycles in a whole leanguage foregin language class: Some theoretical and practical insights,” Texas Pap. Foreign Lang. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 83–99, 2001.
B. Y. White and J. R. Frederiksen, “Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–118, 1998, doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2.
D. Llewellyn, Teaching high school science through inquiry and argumentation, 2nd ed. California: Corwin, 2013.
T. Nelson and D. Slavit, “Supported teacher collaborative inquiry,” Teach. Educ. Q., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 99–116, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479033
M. Duran and İ. Dökme, “The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2887–2908, 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a.
M. Jamhari, “Improving students’ critical thinking skills through argument mapping-based guided inquiry on human excretory system,” EduTeach J. Edukasi dan Teknol. Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 65–77, 2020, doi: 10.37859/eduteach.v1i2.1972.
Y. L. Rahmi, H. Alberida, and M. Y. Astuti, “Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through inquiry-based learning model,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1317, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012193.
G. Makransky, T. S. Terkildsen, and R. E. Mayer, “Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning,” Learn. Instr., vol. 60, no. April, pp. 225–236, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007.
National Research Council, Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015.
D. E. Smith et al., “Trilogy, a planetary geodesy mission concept for measuring the expansion of the solar system,” Planet. Space Sci., vol. 153, pp. 127–133, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2018.02.003.
N. R. Herga, M. I. Grmek, and D. Dinevski, “Virtual laboratory as an element of visualization when teaching chemical contents in science class,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 157–165, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i4/13418.pdf
T. Budai and M. Kuczmann, “Towards a modern, Integrated virtual laboratory system,” Acta Polytech. Hungarica, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 191–204, 2018, doi: 10.12700/APH.15.3.2018.3.11.
L. Dong-Joon, “What is JavaLab?,” 2019. https://javalab.org/en/about_javalab/ (accessed Apr. 11, 2023).
J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to design and evaluate research in education, 11th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2023.
World Bank Group, Conducting classroom observations: Stallings “classroom snapshot” observation system for an electronic tablet. World Bank Education Global Practice, 2017.
World Bank Group, Conducting classroom observations: Analyzing classroom dynamics and instructional time using the stallings “classroom snapshot” observation system. SIEF, 2015.
C. Brion and P. A. Cordeiro, “Lessons learned from observing teaching practices: The case of Ghana,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 12–20, 2019, doi: 10.7176/jep/10-12-02.
J. Price, K. Kubacka, G. Gambhir, M. Guevara, and S. Hine, Understanding the classroom: A guide to selecting classroom observation tools. National Foundation for Educational Research, 2022.
L. Casey, “Questions, curiosity and the inquiry cycle,” E-Learning Digit. Media, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 510–517, 2014, doi: 10.2304/elea.2014.11.5.510.
J. Schiefer, J. Golle, M. Tibus, and K. Oschatz, “Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment of the inquiry cycle,” J. Adv. Acad., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1932202X18825152.
W. R. Sherman and A. Craif, Understanding virtual reality, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Morgan Kaufmann, 2019.
National Research Council, Next generation science standards: For states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.
Z. An, “The influence of teacher discipline on teaching effect and students’ psychology in universities and the normative suggestions for discipline behavior,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. 910764, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910764.
P.-H. Li, D. Mayer, and L.-E. Malmberg, “Teacher well-being in the classroom: A micro-longitudinal study,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 115, no. July, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103720.
T. K. Shackelford and V. A. Weekes-Shackelford, Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hety Mashita, Martini Martini, Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.
