KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA PADA DISCOVERY LEARNING PENDEKATAN RME BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS V
Abstract
Abstrak
Pembelajaran matematika perlu dirancang untuk mendorong siswa memiliki kemahiran matematis, seperti kemampuan pemahaman, komunikasi, koneksi, penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis. Kemampuan itu diperlukan supaya siswa dapat menerapkan dan memanfaatkan informasi matematika dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan literasi matematika. Literasi matematika menurut OECD (2016), didefinisikan sebagai kapasitas untuk mengenal dan memahami peran matematika di dunia, memecahkan masalah matematika dalam berbagai konteks, menafsirkan pernyataan matematika, dan menerapkan matematika secara rasional. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar Kolb siswa kelas V Madrasah Ibtidaiyah dengan pembelajaran discovery learning pendekatan RME. Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Adapun hasil dari penelitian adalah dilihat dari 7 indikator dalam literasi matematika bahwa gaya belajar siswa tipe accommodator lebih baik dibandingkan gaya belajar lainnya. Gaya belajar assimilator dan diverger kemampuan literasi matematika siswa hampir sama tetapi gaya belajar converger paling rendah dibandingkan dari assimilator dan diverger.
Abstract
Mathematics learning needs to be designed to encourage students to have mathematical skills, such as the ability to understand, communicate, connect, reason and solve mathematical problems. Capability is needed so students can apply and utilize mathematical information in their daily lives. This is in line with mathematical literacy. Mathematical literacy according to the OECD (2016), is defined as the capacity to recognize and understand the role of mathematics in the world, solve mathematical problems in various contexts, interpret mathematical statements, and apply mathematics rationally. The purpose of this study was to determine the students' mathematical literacy skills in terms of Kolb's learning style of class V Ibtidaiyah Madrasas with discovery learning learning the RME approach. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The results of the study are seen from 7 indicators in mathematical literacy that the accommodator type of student learning style is better than other learning styles. The assimilator learning style and the students' mathematical literacy abilities combined were similar but the lowest converger learning style was compared to the assimilator and diverger.
Downloads
References
Hall, J. & Matthews, E. 2008. The Measurement of Progress and The Role of Education. European Journal of Education. Vol. 43 No. 1.
Imam. G. (2013). Metode Kualitatif Teori & Praktik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Hlm. 155
Junaedi, I. & Asikin, M. (2012). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika Humanistik untuk Meningkatkan Kemahiran Matematis. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 1(2)
Kunandar. (2007). Guru Profesional. Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
OECD, (2000). Measure student knowledge and skill: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: OECD
OECD. (2003). PISA 2003 Assessment Framework. http://www.oecd.org (24 Oktober 2016)
OECD. (2012). “PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do”.OECD Publication, vol. 1. http://www.oecd.org. (24 Oktober 2016)
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-years-old know and what they can do with what they know. Tersedia di http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-result-overview.pdf (diunduh 15 November 2016)
OECD. (2016). “PISA 2015 Results (Volume 1): Excellence and Equity in Education”. PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en (diunduh 8 November 2017)
OECD. (2017). “PISA 2015 Assesment and Analytical Framework:Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, revised edition. PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en (diunduh 10 Oktober 2017)
Pratiwi, dkk. (2010). Konstruksi Tes Gaya Belajar Berdasarkan Teori Belajar Eksperiensial David A. Kolb. Jurnal interaksi, Vol. 1.1. file:///F:/penelitian%202018/artikel%20pratiwi.pdf
Syah, M. (2016). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Copyright (c) 2018 Kristi Liani Purwanti, Zuanita Adriyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam agree to the following terms: Authors retain the copyright and grant Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
