PENGEMBANGAN TES KOGNITIF BERBASIS REVISI TAKSONOMI BLOOM PADA MATERI SISTEMREPRODUKSI UNTUK SISWA SMA

  • Ainul Uyuni Taufiq Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)

Abstrak

This study aims to determine the quality of the test device was developed. In terms of the quality of test validity, reliability, difficulty level , determinant indeks, and effectiveness of distractors.

This study used a qualitative approach to the development of research methods. Development of procedures to implement the software development model 4-D which consists of phases define, design, develop and dessiminate.

The data were obtained through two criteria: (1) the validity of the data obtained through experts assessment, (2) item validity data, reliability, difficulty level , determinant indeks, and effectiveness of distractors obtained through the test results of cognitive tests. Validity of the data obtained was analyzed mathematically and categorized based on the standards set, while item validity data, reliability, difficulty level, determinant indeks, and effectiveness of distractors analyzed with the help of Microsoft Excel 2007.

Validation results showed that cognitive tests have very valid category with a value of 3.54 based on experts assessment. The next conducted trials to determine the quality of the cognitive tests. In terms of item validity, valid category (92% for type A, 92% for type B), not valid (8% for type A, 8% for type B). In terms of reliability, including in the category of reliable with values about 0,71 for type A and 0,74 for type B. In terms of difficulty level, easy category (30% for type A, 22% for type B), medium category (48% for type A, 65% for type B), difficult category (22% for type A, 13% for type B) . Determinant indeks, poor category (9% type A, 4% type B), satisfactory (35% type A, 31% type B), good (52% type A, 61% type B), excellent (4% type A, 4% type B). Effectiveness of distractors, effective category (87% type A, 91% type B), not effective category (13% type A, 9% type B) 

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

##submission.authorBiography##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Dosen Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar, Kampus II Jl. H. M. Yasin Limpo No 36 Samata-Gowa, Sulawesi Selatan (92118)Telepon: 085242728022

Referensi

Adiputra, I.B.R. (2012). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Ulangan Akhir Semester IPS Terpadu Buatan MGMP IPS Kabupaten Gianyar Kelas VII Semester 1 Tahun Pelajaran 2011 – 2012, (online), (http://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=jurnal%2Banalisis%2Bpengecoh%2Fdistraktor%2Bsoal&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpasca.undiksha.ac.id%2Fe-journal%2Findex.php%2Fjurnal_ep%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F370%2F164&ei=cZ25UfOSFcPJrAfRvYDoBw&usg=AFQjCNEXksN465JfmbOHnSRa7ZVCprTLsA&bvm=bv.47883778,d.bmk, Diakses 13 Juni 2013).

Arikunto, S. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Indahati. (2012). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Biologi Kelas XI IPA SMA di Kabupaten Luwu. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Makassar: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Ivanty, D.W.N, Aminah, N.S, Ekawati, E.Y. (2013). Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Tengah Semester Genap Fisika X SMA Untuk Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, (Online), Vol. 1, No.1, ISSN: 2338-0691, (http://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=jurnal%2Banalisis%2Bdaya%2Bbeda%2Bsoal&source=web&cd=13&cad=rja&ved=0CC0QFjACOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id%2Findex.php%2Fpfisika%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F1789%2F1282&ei=Vpm5UYeRKMejrQf00YCoAQ&usg=AFQjCNFgxflx-ztQr_G6D3uuXpeFBq3Mow&bvm=bv.47883778,d.bmk, Diakses 13 Juni 2013).

Kasim, J. (2009). Apakah Analisis Butir Soal Perlu?. Jurnal Medik, (online), No. 3, September-Desember 2009, (http://bdkjakarta.kemenag.go.id/file/media/3234forumapakahanalisisbutirsoalperlu.pdf, Diakses 13 Juni 2013).

Lababa, J. (2008). Analisis Butir Soal Dengan Teori Tes Klasik: Sebuah Pengantar. Jurnal Iqra’, (online), Vol. 5 Januari – Juni 2008, (http://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=jurnal%2Banalisis%2Bpengecoh%2Fdistraktor%2Bsoal&source=web&cd=25&cad=rja&ved=0CDgQFjAEOBQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.tp.ac.id%2Fwpcontent%2Fuploads%2F4328%2Fdownload-03-jun2936.pdf&ei=bqK5UaHGKYb8rAfJiYDICw&usg=AFQjCNGajET02n-MerIZ5wZqgvcYjaD5iRw&bvm=bv.47883778,d.bmk, Diakses 13 Juni 2013).

Nurdin. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Matematik yang Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Metakognitif Untuk Menguasai Bahan Ajar. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Purwanto, N. (2004). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purwanto. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sahabuddin. (2007). Mengajar dan Belajar. Makassar: Badan Penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Sudaryono. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

Trianto. (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Widodo. (2010). Analisis Butir Soal Tes. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, (Online), No.14, Tahun ke-9, (http://www.bpkpenabur.or.id/files/Hal.%2058-67%20Analisis%20Butir%20Soal.pdf, diakses 13 Juni 2013).

Diterbitkan
2015-12-01
Bagian
Artikel
Abstrak viewed = 1908 times