TYPES OF TEACHER TALK TO SUPPORT STUDENTS’ ACTIVENESS IN ONLINE CLASSROOM
Abstract
This study concerned with teacher talk in online classroom. The interaction between teacher and students are analyzed into types of teacher talk. The aim of this study is to find it types of teacher talk to support students’ activeness in online classroom. Descriptive qualitative design was used as research methodology. The researcher was as nonparticipant observer in online class. There were two teachers involved as research participants. The participants conducted online class by using Zoom Application. Video recording from Zoom was analyzed by applying three steps, which consisted of reading or memoing data, describing data, and classifying data. In analyzing the data, the researcher referred to types of teacher talk by Brown who classified teacher talk into seven types. The research findings found there were five types of teacher talk in online classroom. Those are praising and encouraging, accepting ideas of students, asking questions, lecturing, and giving direction. These types found are used to support the students’ activeness in online classroom. Therefore, active and passive students are related to teacher talk. This study is implied to be used as reference to be applied by the teachers to keep the students active in online classroom.
Downloads
References
Abdul, N. B., Mahmud, M., Wello, B., & Dollah, S. Instructional Communication: Form and Factors Affecting Students Participation at Higher Education Class.
Abdul, N. B. (2016). Psychological Barriers in Receptive Skills Acquisition. English and Literature Journal, 3(1), 42-51. Google Scholar
Ahmad, M., Shakir, A., & Arshad, A. (2020).A conversation analysis of teacher talk and learners' involvement in a Pakistani ESL classroom. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(1), 20-42. Google Scholar
Aisyah N. (2016) an Analysis of Teachers’ Talk in EFL Classroom, Department of English Education, Indonesia University of Education. Google Scholar
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classrooms: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Basra, S., &Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73-81. Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2007). Teaching by Principles.San Fransisco State University. United State of America: Pearson Longman
Crespo, S. (2002). Praising and correcting: Prospective teachers investigate their teacherly talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 739-758. Google Scholar
Datnow, A., Choi, B., Park, V., & St John, E. (2018). Teacher Talk about Student Ability and Achievement in the Era of Data-Driven Decision Making. Teachers College Record, 120(4), n4.
Endahati, N., &Widagsa, R. (2018). Social Media as Strategy to Improve Students’ participation And Motivation In English Subject. English and Literature Journal, 5(2), 161-172. Google Scholar
Gay, L. R. (2006). Educational Research, Competencies for Analysis andApplication. Eight Edition. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall, PearsonEducation Inc. Google Scholar
Hwang, J. S. (2012). A Study of the Cognition and the Requirement on the Key Competency of Dental Technology. The Journal of Korean Academy of Dental Technology, 34(4), 457-469. Google Scholar
Jing, N., & Jing, J. (2018). Teacher talk in an EFL classroom: A pilot study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(3), 320-324. Google Scholar
Morell, T. (2007). What Enhances EFL Students’ Participation In Lecture Discourse? Student, Lecturer And Discourse Perspectives. Journal Of English For Academic Purposes, 6(3), 222-237. Google Scholar
Mulyati A F. (2013). A Study of Teacher and Student Talk in Verbal Classroom Interaction to Develop Speaking Skill for Young Leaners¸ English Education Program of Indonesia University of Education. Google Scholar
Nasir A, Yunisrina GY and Andri W. (2019).A Qualitative Study of Teacher Talk in an EFL Classroom Interaction in Aceh Tengah, Indonesia, University Syiah Kuala. Google Scholar
Nunan, David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Pangesti D. (2016). Teacher Talk in English Teaching and Learning Process at SMK Batik 1 Surakarta in 2015/2016 Academic Year, Muhammadiyah University Surakarta. Google Scholar
Pujiastuty RT. (2013). Classroom Interaction; an Analysis of Teacher Talk and Student Talk in English for Young Leaners (EYL), English Education Study Program of Indonesia University of Education. Google Scholar
Putri AS. (2015). The Analysis of Teacher Talk and the Characteristic of Classroom Interaction in English as a Foreign Language Classroom, Dept. of English Education, Indonesia University of Education. Google Scholar
Qashoa, S. H. (2013). Effects of teacher question types and syntactic structures on EFL classroom interaction. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 52-62 Google Scholar
Sert, N. (2006). EFL student teachers’ learning autonomy. The Asian EFL Journal, 8(2), 180-201. Google Scholar
Sofyan RR anMurni M. (2018). Teacher Talk in Classroom Interaction: a Study an English Department in Indonesia, State University of Makassar, Indonesia. Google Scholar
Tsui, A. B. (2001). Classroom interaction. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages, 120-125.
Wang (2014) the Analysis of Teacher Talk in “Leaner-centered” Teaching Model.International Journal of Education and Pedagogical Science
Xiao-yan M. (2006).Teacher Tal and EFL in University Classroom, Chongqing Normal University & Yangtze Normal University, China. Google Scholar
Yanfen L and Yuqin.(2010). A Study of Teacher Talk in Interaction in English Classes, Harbin Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
granted to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead wider dissemination of the work.
continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license
receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
