THE USE OF SWEAR WORDS IN PEWDIEPIE’S YOUTUBE VIDEOS
Abstract
Abstract
This research discussed about, the use of swear words uttered by PewDiePie’s in his Youtube Videos which aimed to show the types of swear word found in the PewDiePie’s videos, and to show the dominant types of swear words based on the meaning and meaningless swearing. This research was descriptive qualitative method. The object of the study were five videos from Pewdiepie’s Youtube channel which collected based on most viewed videos on his Youtube channel. The researcher used note taking as the instruments in order to get the valid data. The findings showed that there were five types of swear words that used in PewDiePie’s videos those were: 14 data of Dysphemistics, 38 data of Idiomatically, 1 data of Abusively, 24 data of Emphatically, 27 data of Carthartically. The researcher conclude that the dominant type of swearing that Pewdiepie used in his videos is SW2 which does not have any intrinsic meaning at all (categorized as Emphatic swearing and Idiomatic swearing) rather it is merely a word that could express the feeling towards other people without offend someone’s pride.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini membahas tentang, penggunaan kata-kata umpatan yang diucapkan oleh PewDiePie dalam Video Youtube-nya yang bertujuan untuk menunjukkan jenis kata umpatan yang ditemukan dalam video PewDiePie, dan untuk menunjukkan tipe kata umpatan yang dominan berdasarkan makna dan sumpah tanpa arti. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Objek penelitian ini adalah lima video dari saluran Youtube Pewdiepie yang dikumpulkan berdasarkan video yang paling banyak dilihat di saluran Youtube-nya. Peneliti menggunakan catatan sebagai instrumen untuk mendapatkan data yang valid. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa ada lima jenis kata umpatan yang digunakan dalam video PewDiePie yaitu: 14 data Dysphemistics, 38 data Idiomatically, 1 data Abusively, 24 data secara emosional, 27 data Cartrama. Peneliti menyimpulkan bahwa jenis sumpah yang dominan yang digunakan Pewdiepie dalam videonya adalah SW2 yang sama sekali tidak memiliki makna intrinsik (dikategorikan sebagai sumpah Emphatic dan sumpah Idiomatik), melainkan hanya sebuah kata yang bisa mengungkapkan perasaan terhadap orang lain tanpa menyinggung kebanggaan seseorang.
Downloads
References
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Andersson, L.G and P Trudgill. "Swearing." L, Monaghan and Goodman J. A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication. UK: Blackwell: Oxford, 2007. 195-199.
Andersson, Lars- Gunnar and Peter Trudgill. Bad Language (Penguin Language & Linguistics). Mishawaka: Penguin, 1992.
Anthony McEnery, Zhonghua Xiao. Swearing in Modern British English: The Case of Fuck in the BNC. Penguin, 2004 .
B, Crecente. "PewDiePie isn't just a popular Let's Play YouTuber, he's the $4M-a-year king of YouTube." 2014. http://www.polygon.com/2014/6/17/5817118/how-much-does-pewdiepie-make.
B, Kristy. Who's Swearing Now? The Social Aspects of Conversational Swearing. 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. British Library.
Baruch, Y and S Jenkin. "Swearing at work and permissive leadership culture: When anti-social becomes social and incivility is acceptable." Leadership & Organization Development Journal (2007): 492-507.
Biklen, Bogdan and. Qualitative Research for Education: an Introduction to Theory and Method. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc, 1992.
C, Hall. " PewDiePie 'more influential' among teens than Katy Perry and Hollywood elite." 2014. http://www.polygon.com/2014/8/7/5980019/pewdiepie-more-popular-amongteens-than-traditional-celebrities.
Chrystal, D. The Cambridge Ensyclopedia of The English Language 2nd Edition. USA: University of Cambridge Press, 2003.
Crystal, David. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Fairman, C. Fuck. Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series, 2006. 59.
Fairman, C. M. Fuck. Retrieved April 21st, 2012: From: (http://ssrn.com/abstract=896790), 2006.
Henry, Gary T. Practical Sampling. Vanderbilt University: SAGE Publications, Inc, 1990.
Holmes, Janet. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman, 2001.
Howe, R. The use of Fuck: A sociolinguistic approach to the usage of Fuck in the BNC and Blog Authorship Corpus. Ypsilanti, MI, USA: Eastern Michigan University, 2012.
Hymes, D. On Communicative Competence In J. Pride and J. Holmes. 1972.
J, Lyons. Language and Linguisics: An Introduction. England: Cambridge University, 1981.
Jay. 2,170 Obscene words. Who, what, where, when. New York: Eastern Psychological Association, 1986.
Johnson, F. & Fine, G. "Sex differences in uses and perceptions of obscenity." Women’s Studies in Communication (1985): 11-24. . 8.
Karjalainen, M. "Where have all the swearwords gone?" Analysis of the loss of swearwords in two Swedish translations of J.D Salinger‟s Catcher in the Rye3007,2002. http://www.etheis.helsinki.fi/.ulkasi/engla/pa/karjalainen.pdf.
Kristy, B. Who's Swearing Now? The Social Aspects of Conversational Swearing. 12 Back Chapman Street, Mewcastle upon tyne, NE6 2XX, UK: cambridge scholars publishing, 2012.
Ljung, Magnus. Swearing: A Cross-Cultural Linguistic Study. . Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Michael, S. Practical English Usage. New York: Oxford Up, 1995.
Miles, MB. & Huberman, AM. Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications., 1994.
Montagu, Ashley. The Anatomy of Swearing. U.S.A: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1967.
Nerbonne, G. & Hipskind, M. "The use of profanity in conversational." Journal of Communication Disorders (1972): 47-50. 5.
Paolillo, J. C. "Structure and network in the YouTube core." Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2008. 41. http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/2010.1109/HICSS.2008.2415 .
Patricia, G. Lange. Searching for the ‘You’ in ‘YouTube’: An Analysis of Online Response Ability. California: University of Southern California, 2007.
Pinker, S. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York,: Penguin, 2007.
Kn.d —. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Penguin, 2007.
Piolat, A., & Boch, F. (). "Apprendre en notant et apprendre a` noter." Learning by taking notes and learning to take notes. Ed. & P. Dessus E. Gentaz. Paris: Dunod: Psychologie cognitive et e´ducation, 2004. 133–152.
Rassin, E and Der Heijden Van. "Appearing credible? Swearing helps!" Psychology, Crime, & Law (2005): 177-182.
Rassin, E and P Muris. "Why do women swear? An exploration of reasons for and perceived efficacy of swearing in Dutch female students. ." Personality and Individual (2005): 1669-1674.
Sheth, A. P. "Cursing in English on Twitter." ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (2014): 415-424.
Simonsen, T.M. Categorising YouTube. Denmark: SMID, 2011.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
granted to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead wider dissemination of the work.
continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license
receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
