IMPROVING SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH SMALL GROUPS DISCUSSION FOR THE EIGHTH YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN 2 SALUPUTTI IN TANA TORAJA
Abstrak
Abstract
The objective of the study is to know the small groups discussion can improve the students’ speaking ability. In order to achieve the objective of this study, the writer designed an experimental method using pre-test and post- test. The population of this study was the eighth year students of Junior High School of SMPN 2 Saluputti. The sample of this study was the eight year students in academic year 2015/2016. The number of the students was 16 students. There were four meetings during the experiment. Before the experiment was conducted, the students were given a pre-test. At the end of the experiment, the students were given a post- test. The result of this study revealed that, the post- test scores were better than the pre-test scores. It could be seen by comparing their means. The mean score of the pre-test was 22.8, while the mean of the post test was 78.2. It shows that the mean score of the post test is greater than the pre test. The difference between pre test and post test was 55.3. In line with the result, the writer concludes that the Small Groups Discussion strategy is one of the effective strategies as to increase the activity and student learning outcomes in speaking subject. In teaching and learning activities teachers are expected to make cooperative learning as an alternative type of Small Groups Discussion in speaking subject to increase the activity and student learning outcomes, especially when teaching speaking to eighth year students of junior high school.
Abstrak
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah Diskusi Kelompok Kecil dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa. Untuk mencapai tujuan penelitian ini, penulis merancang metode eksperimen dengan menggunakan pre-test dan post-test. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMPN 2 Saluputti. Sampel penelitian ini adalah delapan tahun siswa pada tahun ajaran 2015/2016. Jumlah siswa adalah 16 siswa. Ada empat pertemuan selama percobaan. Sebelum percobaan dilakukan, siswa diberi pre-test. Pada akhir percobaan, siswa diberi post-tes. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai post-test lebih baik daripada nilai pre-test. Skor rata-rata pre-test adalah 22,8, sedangkan dari post test adalah 78,2. Ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata post test lebih besar daripada pre test. Perbedaan antara pre test dan post test adalah 55,3. Sejalan dengan hasilnya, penulis berkesimpulan bahwa strategi Diskusi Kelompok Kecil merupakan salah satu strategi efektif untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran berbicara. Dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar guru diharapkan dapat melakukan pembelajaran kooperatif sebagai alternatif jenis Diskusi Kelompok Kecil dalam berbicara yang dapat meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa, terutama saat mengajar berbicara kepada siswa kelas VIII SMP.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Referensi
Ali, Marwati. 2007. Stimulating the Ability of the Third Year Students at SMP Kristen Kandora to Speak English by Using Interesting Topics. Thesis S1 Pendidikan. Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja.
Brown, D. 1979. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Printice Hall. Inc
Byrne, D. 1980. Group Work in Language Teaching: Perspective. London: Longman.
Chastain, Kenneth. 1976. Theory to Practice Developing Second Language Skill. Chicago: Rand-Mac Hally.
Clark, L. H. and Starr, L.S. 1981. Secondary and Middle Scholl Teaching Method. New York: Mc. Milan Publisher Co.Inc.
Depdikbud, 1985. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Proses Belajar dan Petunjuk Pelaksanaan System Penelitian. Jakarta: Depdikbud
Freeman, Larsen, Diane. 1986. Technique and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gafur, Abdul Syam. 2003. Increasing the speaking ability of English Conversation circle (ECC) members of English department of UNM through Australian Parliamentary Debate. Thesis, FBS UNM.
Gay L. R. 2006. Educational Research. New York: Charles Merill Publishing Co. And howell Company.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. Teaching English through English. Hongkong: Longman Groups (FE) Itd.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Third Edition. Malaysia: Longman
Harris, D. P. 1969. Testing English as a Second Language. Mcgraw. Hill inc.
Heaton, J.B. 1988. Writing English Test. New York: Longman Group UK Company.
Holden, S. 1981. Drama in Language Teaching. Longman Handbook for Teacher. Essex. Longman Group Limited.
Jabu, Baso. 2008. English Language Testing. Makassar: The UNM Publisher.
Lado, R. 1961. Language Testing. The Construction Use of Foreign Language Test. London: Longman Group.
Longman New Universal Dictionary. 1982.
McGreal, Rory. 1989. Copying Work and Language Learning. English Teaching Forum. Volume XXVII No.2 April 1989.
Pulston, C.B. and Bruder, M.N. 1976. Teaching English as a Second Language: Technique and Procedure. Toronto: Little Brown Company.
Rocks, G. 1981. The Non Stop Discussion Workbook Problem for Intermediate and Advanced Students of English. London: Newbury House Publisher Inc.
Simon, 1972. Value Clarification: A hand of Practical Strategies for Teacher and Students. New York: Hard Publishing.
Skinner, C. 1958. Essential for Education Psychology. New York: Practice Hall.
Sudjana. 1992. Metode Statistika. Bandung: Penerbit Tarsito Bandung.
Tarigan, H.G.1988. Berbicara Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.
Yulistha. 2009. Developing Student’s Speaking Ability Through Group Discussion to the Second Year Students of SMK Ignatius Makale. Thesis S1 Pendidikan. Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
granted to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead wider dissemination of the work.
continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license
receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
