Analisis Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan ChatGPT dalam Penulisan Karya Publikasi Ilmiah: Manfaat dan Tantangan
Abstract
This study discusses the use of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically ChatGPT, in the process of writing scientific publications. ChatGPT, based on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model, significantly aids the writing process by efficiently generating text. While this technology can enhance productivity, there are risks such as plagiarism, information inaccuracies, and a decline in the originality of academic work. The research employed a qualitative method with a case study approach, involving observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis was carried out through data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results show that ChatGPT speeds up the writing process and helps generate ideas, but caution is needed regarding potential biases and ethical concerns. This study recommends verifying information and maintaining the originality of academic work to optimize the use of AI in the academic world.
Downloads
References
Fauzi, F., Tuhuteru, L., Sampe, F., Ausat, A. M. A., & Hatta, H. R. (2023). Analysing the Role of ChatGPT in Improving Student Productivity in Higher Education. Journal on Education, 5(4), 14886–14891. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2563
Fitrah, M., & Luthfiyah. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian: Penelitian Kualitatif, Tindakan Kelas, & Studi Kasus (Cet.1). CV Jejak. Metodologi penelitian: penelitian kualitatif, tindakan kelas & studi kasus - Muh. Fitrah & Luthfiyah - Google Books
Livberber, T., & Ayvaz, S. (2023). The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT. Heliyon, 9(9), e19688. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688
Nazari, M., & Saadi, G. (2024). Developing effective prompts to improve communication with ChatGPT: a formula for higher education stakeholders. Discover Education, 3(1). Developing effective prompts to improve communication with ChatGPT: a formula for higher education stakeholders | Discover Education (springer.com)
Nikita, K. S. (2022). Engaging in Scientific Publishing: Benefits and Norms to Follow as Authors and Reviewers [Young Professionals]. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 64(3), 156–160. DOI: 10.1109/MAP.2022.3163359
Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Peden, A. E., Cole-Hunter, T., Costantini, A., Haghani, M., Rod, J. E., Kelly, S., Torkamaan, H., Tariq, A., David Albert Newton, J., Gallagher, T., Steinert, S., Filtness, A. J., & Reniers, G. (2023). The risks of using ChatGPT to obtain common safety-related information and advice. Safety Science, 167(April), 106244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106244
Rohanda, & Winoto, Y. (2019). Teori-Teori Informasi: Sebuah Kajian Tentang Teori-Teori Perpustakaan dan Ilmu Informasi. CV. Intishar Publishing.
Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. (2023). The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. International Journal of Information Management, 74(September 2023), 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700
Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaitė, R., Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Ziemba, E. (2023). The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110201
Xames, M. D., & Shefa, J. (2023). ChatGPT for research and publication: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.20
Yin, R. K. (2020). Studi Kasus: Desain & Metode. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Copyright (c) 2025 Wafi Ariqo Wafi, Edwin Rizal, Yunus Winoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting your manuscript to our journal, you are following Copyright and License
