Diskrepansi Sanksi Adat terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Menurut Tokoh Adat dan Tokoh Agama

  • M. Halim Asnawi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
    (ID)
  • Sutrisno Hadi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
    (ID)
Keywords: Discrepancy, Customary Sanctions, Theft

Abstract

This article discusses the discrepancy of customary sanctions that occur to perpetrators of the crime of theft by taking the point of view of the opinions of traditional leaders and religious leaders. This research was conducted in Manggar Raya Village, Banyuasin. This research is a type of field research research by making the results of interviews as primary data sources and books, journals, theses and articles as secondary data sources. This article is arranged systematically according to a series of events that occur collectively and deductively. Based on the results of research and discussion of the discrepancy of customary sanctions against perpetrators of the crime of theft, it is true. In the 1989 incident, the perpetrator was sentenced to half-body burying, the 2014 incident was sentenced to drag from the upstream and downstream of the village, and in the 2019 incident the perpetrator was sentenced to 5 years of exile. However, in its application it is not in accordance with what has been agreed upon and causes unrest in some people. According to traditional leaders and religious leaders, the discrepancy in customary sanctions was caused by several factors, namely the emotional level of the residents of Manggar Raya Village, the number of people belonging to the lack of understanding of the law, kinship and the perpetrators of theft disobeyed the agreed sanctions or the perpetrators of theft rebelled when the sanctions were imposed applied.

References

Abdullah, Sulaiman. Sumber Hukum Islam Permasalahan Dan Fleksibilitas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1995.

Agus, Bustanuddin. Agama Dalam Kehidupan Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafido Persada, 2016.

Anggraini, Dias, and Hadi Daeng Mappunna. “Tradisi Ngidak Endhog Dalam Perkawinan Adat Jawa Perspektif Mazhab Al-Syafi’i; Studi Kasus Di Desa Joho Kabupaten Sukoharjo.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 98–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i1.16651.

Daryanti, Ulfa, and St Nurjannah. “Analisis ‘Urf Terhadap Tradisi Janur Kuning Dalam Adat Pernikahan Jawa Di Kabupaten Luwu Timur.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 250–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i1.16220.

Desemriany, Siti Sharah, and Lomba Sultan. “Tradisi Nipanrasai Terhadap Kasus Silariang Perspektif ‘Urf Di Desa Samataring, Kecamatan Kelara, Kabupaten Jeneponto.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v1i3.15463.

Haq, Islamul, Wahidin Wahidin, and Saidah Saidah. “Melampaui Batas (Noodewwr Exces) Dalam Membela Diri; Studi Perbandingan Antara Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 1 (June 21, 2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V2I1.14295.

Hasan, Hamzah. “Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Kewajiban Asasi Manusia; Telaah Hukum Pidana Islam.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 1, no. 2 (2019): 92–118. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V1I2.11650.

Iskandar. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Cet., I. Jakarta: Gaung Persada, 2009.

Lubis, Marzuki. “Peranan Budaya Hukum Dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2014): 16–37.

Mubaraq, Zulfi. Sosiologi Agama. Cet., I. Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2010.

Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution, Dkk. Ilmu Sosial Budaya Dasar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.

Mukhtar. Bimbingan Skripsi, Thesis Dan Artikel Ilmiah. Jambi: Suthan Thaha Press, 2007.

Nonci, Hajir. Sosiologi Agama. Cet., I. Makassar: Alauddin University Press, 2014.

Saidah, Saidah, and Abdul Syatar. “Al-Daruriyat Al Khams Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian.” Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 14, no. 1 (2020): 121–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24239/blc.v14i1.510.

Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: PT. Alfabeta, 2016.

Supardin, Supardin. “Produk Pemikiran Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 4, no. 2 (2017): 223–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v4i2.5695.

Supardin, and Abdul Syatar. “Adultery Criminalization Spirit in Islamic Criminal Law: Alternatives in Indonesia’s Positive Legal System Reform.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (December 26, 2021): 913–27. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V5I2.9353.

Syarifuddin, Amir. Ushul Fiqh II. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Tamrin, Dahlan. Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam. Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2010.

Warjiyati, Sri. “Ilmu Hukum Adat.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 6, no. 11 (1967): 951–52.

Published
2023-01-31
How to Cite
Asnawi, M. H., & Hadi, S. (2023). Diskrepansi Sanksi Adat terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Menurut Tokoh Adat dan Tokoh Agama. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 4(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.vi.33418
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 108 times