KESADARAN METAKOGNITIF MEMBACA DAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI TEKS SAINS PADA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN FISIKA
Abstract
Membaca melibatkan proses yang aktif dan kompleks yang meliputi pemahaman terhadap teks, membangun dan menafsirkan makna dan menggunakan makna untuk menggambarkan situasi teks. Metakognitif dalam membaca dapat membedakan pembaca yang terampil dan tidak terampil. Membaca di tingkat universitas tidak hanya mengacu pada keterampilan kognitif yang terkait dengan proses membaca yang mencakup kemampuan mengkodekan kata dan pengetahuan sintaksis, tetapi memerlukan keterampilan inferensial tingkat tinggi, kemampuan untuk menghubungkan berbagai konsep atau ide yang terkandung dalam teks secara koheren, kemampuan untuk menekan informasi yang tidak relevan, metakognitif, strategi membaca dan motivasi. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa dari 62 orang mahasiswa hanya separuhnya yang memiliki kemampuan membuat inferensi. Selain itu kesadaran tentang stategi dalam membaca bekorelasi lemah dengan kemampuan memahami bacaan. Temuan dalam penelitian ini secara umum menyiratkan bahwa mahasiswa tidak sepenuhnya menyadari strategi membaca dalam tugas membaca teks sains. Oleh karena itu, mahasiswa harus dilatih secara eksplisit berbagai strategi membaca.
Downloads
References
Afflerbach ,P., Cho, Byeong-Young, & Kim, Jong-Yun, 2015, Conceptualizing and Assessing Higher-Order Thinking in Reading, Theory Into Practice, Vol. 54, pp 203–212
Caverly, D. C., Orlando, V. P., & Mullen, J. A. L, 2000, Textbook study reading, 105–147, dalam D. C. Caverly (Ed.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research, Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,.
Clarke, P. J., 2014, Developing Reading Comprehension. John Wiley & Sons.
Graesser, A.C., 2007, An Introduction to Strategic Reading Comprehension, pp3 -26, dalam McNamara, D. S (Ed). Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc,
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G, 1987, Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues of definition, measurement and instruction. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 22, pp 255–278
Maki, R. H., 1998, Test predictions over text material, pp. 117–144, Dalam J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Ed.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
McNamara, D.S & Magliano, J.P., 2009, Self-Explanation and Metacognition The Dynamics of Reading dalam D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Ed.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education, New York: Routledge
McNamara, D.S, 2007, The 4-Pronged Comprehension Strategy Framework, pp 465-491, dalam McNamara, D.S (Ed), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc,.
Mokhtari, K. & Reichard, C., 2002, Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94, pp 249–259
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D.M, & Reichard, C.A., 2018, Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and Testing for Factorial Invariance, Education Faculty Publications and Presentations
National Assessment Governing Board, 2013, Reading Framework for the 2013 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author
OECD, 2014, PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science, OECD Publishing
O’Reilly, T. & McNamara, D. S, 2007,The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional “high-stakes” measures of high school students’ science achievement, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 44, pp161–196.
Oxford, R., & Crookall, D., 1989, Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues, Modern Language Journal, Vol. 73(4), pp 404–419
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K. & McNamara, D. S., 2009, Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction
Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y., 1984, Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 76(6), pp 1239–1252
Pearson, P. D., Roehler, L. R., Dole, J. A., & Duffy, G. G., 1992, Developing expertise in reading comprehension, pp 145–199, dalam S. J. Samuels, & A. E. Farstrup (Ed.), What research has to say about reading instruction, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Spence, D. J., 1995, Explicit science reading instruction in grade 7: Metacognitive awareness, metacognitive self-management and science reading comprehension, British Columbia, Canada
Shapiro, A. M., 2004, How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 41, pp 159–189
Sharpe, P., 2000, How to Prepare for the TOEFL Test. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara
Tobias, S & Everson, H. T., 2009, The Importance of Knowing What You Know A Knowledge Monitoring Framework for Studying Metacognition in Education, dalam D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education, New York: Routledge
Vellutino, F. R., 2003, Individual differences as sources of variability in reading comprehensionin elementary school children, pp 51-81, dalam A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension, New York: Guilford
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.
