A STUDY OF RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS ATTACHED TO THE FORMER TERRORIST CONVICTS’ FAMILY AS SEEN IN SOCIAL INTERACTION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research discusses religious symbol attached to the former terrorist convicts’ family as seen in social interaction. The theory applied in this study is George Herbert’s the symbolic interactionism. This theory is used in analysing the phenomena in society because it is rooted in and focuses on the essence of humans as relational beings. This study is also reinforced by Erik H. Erikson's theory of psychosocial developmental stages and family sociology. The employed research method is qualitative method supported by interpretive paradigm. The data collection methods in this research are in-depth interview, observation, field notes, and documentation. The locations in the study are the areas of Surabaya (including Sidoarjo), Malang and Probolinggo, which are known as the hideout locations of JAD (Jamaah Asharut Daulah) terrorist network. This study concludes that former terrorist convicts and their families still strongly embrace the religious symbols in the process of social interaction. The radicalization that occurs within the family is classified as a discourse, not an action. The resilience should be embraced by these former convict families to strengthen their existence as well as prevent them from returning to their groups. The government and all stakeholders must continue to provide guidance to the families of former terrorist convicts.
Keywords: Family; Psychosocial; Religious Symbols; Symbolic Interaction; Former Terrorist Convicts
ملخص
تناقش هذه الدراسة الرموز الدينية للمدانين بالإرهاب السابقين وأسرهم. النظرية المستخدمة في هذه الدراسة هي تفاعل رمزي أشاعه جورج هربرت ميد. تُستخدم نظرية التفاعل الرمزي في تحليل أعراض المجتمع ، لأنها متجذرة في طبيعة البشر وتركز عليها ككائنات علائقية. هذه الدراسة مدعومة أيضًا بنظرية مراحل التطور النفسي والاجتماعي وعلم اجتماع الأسرة التي روج لها إريك إريكسون. الطريقة المستخدمة هي الطريقة النوعية ، باستخدام نموذج تفسيري. طرق جمع البيانات في هذه الدراسة من خلال المقابلات والملاحظات والملاحظات الميدانية والتوثيق المعمقة. تشمل المواقع التي شملتها الدراسة سورابايا (بما في ذلك سيدوارجو) ومالانج وبروبولينجو ، وهي أماكن اختباء لشبكة JAD الإرهابية (جماعة أشاروت دولاه). ونتيجة لذلك ، لا يزال المدانون السابقون بالإرهاب وعائلاتهم أقوياء في الحفاظ على الرموز الدينية ، وكلها تستخدم في عملية التنشئة الاجتماعية في المجتمع. يُصنَّف حاليًا احتمال حدوث التطرف داخل أنفسهم وعائلاتهم كشكل من أشكال الخطاب وليس الفعل. في هذا الموقف ، لا تزال هناك حاجة لتدخل من الحكومة وجميع أصحاب المصلحة حتى يمكن تقليل احتمالية التطرف.
الكلمات المفتاحية: عائلة; نفسية اجتماعية; رموز دينية; تفاعل رمزي; مدانون إرهابيون سابقون
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini membahas tentang simbol-simbol keagamaan dari mantan narapidana teroris dan keluarganya. Teori yang dipakai dalam kajian ini adalah interaksi simbolik yang dipopulerkan George Herbert Mead. Teori interaksi simbolik digunakan dalam menganalisis gejala masyarakat, karena berakar dan berfokus pada hakekat manusia sebagai makhluk relasional. Kajian ini juga didukung oleh teori tahap perkembangan psikolososial dan sosiologi keluarga yang dipopulerkan Erik H. Erikson. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif, menggunakan paradigma interpretif. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini dengan wawancara mendalam, observasi, catatan lapangan, dan dokumentasi. Lokasi dalam penelitian meliputi wilayah Surabaya (termasuk Sidoarjo), Malang dan Probolinggo yang merupakan lokasi dari persembunyian jaringan teroris JAD (Jamaah Asharut Daulah). Hasilnya, mantan narapidana teroris dan keluarganya masih kuat dalam mempertahankan simbol-simbol keagamaan, yang semua itu digunakan dalam proses sosialisasi dalam masyarakat. Potensi radikalisasi yang terjadi dalam diri mereka dan keluarga saat ini tergolong dalam bentuk wacana bukan aksi. Dalam posisi ini, tetap diperlukan intervensi dari pemerintah dan semua pemangku kepentingan agar potensi radikalisasi itu benar-benar bisa diminimalkan.
Downloads
Article Details
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE STATEMENT
COPYRIGHT
Jurnal Adabiyah is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. Authors hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restriction to their work. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, and print the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LICENSE TO PUBLISH
1. License
The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content for any purpose, even commercially, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the corresponding author warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this statement.
5. Miscellaneous
Jurnal Adabiyah may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
References
Amri, Muhammad, Risna Mosiba, and Saidna Zulfiqar Bin-Tahir. “Interreligious Tolerance in the Perception of Maluku Muslim Society.” Jurnal Adabiyah 20, no. 1 (2020): 178–195.
Aulia, Guruh Ryan. “Pengaruh Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan Terhadap Sikap Kepedulian Sosial.” Jurnal Ushuluddin: Media Dialog Pemikiran Islam 23, no. 1 (2021): 105.
Berger, Peter L. The Social Construction of Reality. Palatine: Anchor Book, 1966.
Burgess, Ernest W. “The Family As A Unity Of Interacting Personalities.” The Family 7, no. 1 (1926): 3.
Dillistone, F.W. Daya Kekuatan Simbol. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2002.
Driver, Michael J., and Siegfried Streufert. “Integrative Complexity: An Approach to Individuals and Group as Information-Processing Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1969): 272.
Durkin, K. Developmental Social Psychology From Infancy To Old Age. New York: Blackwell Publisher Inc, 1995.
Erikson, Erik H. Childhood and Society. New York: WW Norton & Company, 1993.
Fatiyah. “Pemahaman Santri Terhadap Nilai-Nilai Pancasila.” Jurnal Adabiyah 17, no. 1 (2017): 44.
Geertz, Hildred. Keluarga Jawa. Jakarta: Grafiti Press, 1973.
Halse, Rolf. “The Muslim-American Neighbour as Terrorist: The Representation of a Muslim Family in 24.” Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research 5, no. 1 (2012): 3.
Hequembourg, Amy L., and Michael P. Farrell. “Lesbian Motherhood: Negotiating Marginal-Mainstream Identities.” Gender & Society 13, no. 4 (1999): 540.
Hoffman, Bruce. Inside Terrorism. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 2017.
Hugo, Graeme. “Effects of International Migration on the Family in Indonesia.” Asian and Paciific Migration Journal 11, no. 1 (2002): 13–46.
Jailani, Abdul Qodir, and R. F. Rachman. “Kajian Semiotik Budaya Masyarakat: Nilai Keislaman Dalam Tradisi Ter-Ater Di Lumajang.” MUHARRIK: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial 3, no. 2 (2020): 125–137.
Kruglanski, Arie W., Edward Orehek, Xiaoyan Chen, and Mark Dechesne. “Fully Committed: Suicide Bombers Motivation And The Quest For Personal Significance.” Political Psychology 30, no. 3 (2009): 331–357.
Lauren, Shapiro R., and John Jay. “Women’s Radicalization to Religious Terrorism: An Examination of ISIS Cases in the United States.” Islamic States Online Activity and Response 42, no. 1–2 (2019): 88.
Mead, Goerge Herbert. Mind, Self and Society: From a Standpoint of Social Behaviorist. Edited by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
Meltzer, Bernard N. “Meads Social Psychology.” In Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology, edited by Jerome G. Manis and Bernard N. Meltzer, 38. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
Mulyana, Deddy. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma Bari Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018.
Nelson, Lindsey D. “Herbert Blumer’s Symbolic Interactionism. University of Colorado at Boulder Spring.” Colorado.Edu. Last modified 1998. Accessed January 5, 2020. http://www.colorado.edu/ Communication /metadiscourses/Papers/ App_Papers/Nelson.htm.
Nihayaty, Arini Indah, and Atikah Mardhiya Rohmy. “Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Komunitas Untuk Menghadapi Konten Islam Ekstrim Di Internet.” Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam 6, no. 2 (2020): 213–227.
Nihayaty, Arini Indah, and Bagong Suyanto. “Strategi Pembinaan Mental Masyarakat Dalam Menghadapi Radikalisme.” Al-Tazkiah: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam 9, no. 2 (2020): 95–112.
Nirwana, Andi, and Muhammad Rais. “Toleransi Antar Umat Beragama Islam Dan Kristen Pada Masyarakat Kelurahan Paccinongang Kecamatan Somba Opu Kabupaten Gowa.” Jurnal Al Adyaan; Jurnal Sosial dan Agama 6, no. 2 (2020): 185.
Piliang, Yasraf Amir. Hipersemiotik: Tafsir Cultural Studies Atas Matinya Makna. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2003.
Puspitawati, Herien. Gender Dan Keluarga: Konsep Dan Realita Di Indonesia. Bogor: PT Penerbit IPB Press, 2012.
Rachman, R. F. “Perspektif Karen Armstrong Tentang Islamofobia Di Media Barat.” Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam 4, no. 2 (2018): 282–291.
Rahman, Abd. “Family Resilience in Islamic Perspective (A Case Study of Parent and Child Interaction Behavior in the District of Somba Opu Gowa).” Jurnal Adabiyah 20, no. 2 (2020): 351.
Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.
Ray, Brian D. “Homesschoolingassociated With Beneficial Learner And Societal Outcomes Buteducatorsdo Not Promote It.” Peabody Journal Of Education 88, no. 3 (2013): 324.
Ridwan, N.K. Agama Borjuis: Kritik Atas Nalar Islam Murni. Yogyakarta: Aruzz, 2004.
Ritzer, George, and Douglas J. Goodman. Teori Sosiologi: Dari Teori Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Mutakhir Teori Sosial Posmodern. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2010.
Rohmy, Atikah Mardhiya, Teguh Suratman, and Arini Indah Nihayaty. “Peranan Tentara Nasional Indonesia Dalam Penindakan Terorisme Berbasis Agama.” AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 7, no. 1 (2020): 86–112.
Rose, Arnold Marshall. “A Summary of Symbolic Interaction Theory.” In Theories and Paradigms in Contemporary Sociology, edited by R. Serge Denisoff, 13. Itasca: F. E. Peacock, 1974.
Santrock, John W. Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta: PT Erlangga, 2007.
Shibutani, Tamotsu. Society and Personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1961.
Suyanto, Bagong, Mun’im Sirry, and Rahma Sugihartati. Pseudo-Radicalism and the De-Radicalization of Educated Youth in Indonesia Studiesin Conflict & Terrorism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2019.
Tajibu, Kamaluddin. “Pasang Ri Kajang in Developing Youth Character of Environmental Love in Tana Toa Kajang.” Jurnal Adabiyah 20, no. 1 (2020): 131.
Turner, Bryan. Teori Sosial: Dari Klasik Sampai Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
Umar, Nasaruddin. “Reindonesianisasi Pemahaman Islam.” Detik News. Last modified 2020. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4870589/reindonesianisasi-pemahaman-islam.
Umiarso, and Elbadiansyah. Interaksionisme Simbolik Dari Klasik Hingga Modern. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
———. Interaksionisme Simbolik Dari Klasik Hingga Modern. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
Wajdi, Firdaus. “Globalization and Transnational Islamic Education: The Role of Turkish Muslim Diaspora in Indonesian Islam.” Jurnal Adabiyah 18, no. 2 (2018): 176.
Zara, Ayten. Grief Intensity, Coping and Psychological Health among Family Members and Friends Following a Terrorist Attack, Death Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2019.