THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SALE AND PURCHASE CONTRACT OF SACRIFICIAL ANIMALS IN CURUP COMMUNITY

Main Article Content

Syarial Dedi
Lendrawati Lendrawati

Abstract

This research is triggered from the qurban committee in Curup community to collect funds from the qurban participants by fixing the price of animals. The payment can be all at once and can also be paid in installments every month. This means buying and selling, even though the animals do not exist yet. After the money was collected and it was close to the sacrifice day, the committee went looking for an animal and then bought it. The role of the committee that made the sale and purchase contract was not the owner of the money. There is also buying and selling through brokers, who are not animal owners. Therefore, the main issue in this research concerns the validity of the contract for the sale and purchase of that qurban animals. This is a field research with qualitative approach. This study concluded that the implementation of the contract in muamalah transactions is elastic, especially in the oral form of al-ahwal. This is strongly influenced by the local community customs based on the rule of al-’adah muhakkamah.

الملخص

خلفية هذا البحث هي عمل لجنة الأضحية في مجتمع Curup لجمع الأموال من المشاركين في الأضحية من خلال تحديد أسعار الحيوانات. يمكن أن يكون الدفع دفعة واحدة ويمكن أيضًا سداده على أقساط كل شهر. هذا يعني البيع والشراء ، على الرغم من عدم وجود الحيوانات بعد. بعد أن تم جمع المال وقرب يوم الأضحية ، ذهبت اللجنة للبحث عن حيوان ثم اشترته. لم يكن دور اللجنة التي أبرمت عقد البيع والشراء هو صاحب المال. هناك أيضًا بيع وشراء من خلال سماسرة ليسوا من أصحاب الحيوانات. المشكلة الرئيسية في هذا البحث هي حول صحة عقد بيع وشراء حيوانات القربان. هذا البحث هو بحث ميداني بنهج نوعي. خلصت هذه الدراسة إلى أن تنفيذ العقد في معاملات المعامله مرن ، لا سيما في الشكل الشفهي للأحول. هذا متأثر بشدة بعادات المجتمع المحلي كصوت قواعد محاكمة العدة.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dedi, S., & Lendrawati, L. (2021). THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SALE AND PURCHASE CONTRACT OF SACRIFICIAL ANIMALS IN CURUP COMMUNITY. Jurnal Adabiyah, 21(2), 342-364. https://doi.org/10.24252/jad.v21i2a5
Section
Artikel

References

Abu Daud, Sulaiman al-Sijistani. “Sunan Abu Daud.” In CD-Room Maktabah Syamilah, n.d.
Abu Husain Muslim bin al-Hajjaj al-Naisaburi. “Shahih Muslim.” In CD-Room Maktabah Syamilah, n.d.
Amirullah, Amirullah, Andi Achruh AB Pasinringi, and Rahmawansyah Sahib. “The Transformation of the Muamalah Fiqh Akad at Saga Abepura-Papua Mall During The Covid 19 Pandemic.” Jurnal Adabiyah 20, no. 2 (2020): 320–36. doi:10.24252/jad.v20i2a6.
Awaludin, Aan. “Program Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Teknik Handling dan Penyembelihan Hewan Qurban.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Peternakan 2, no. 2 (2017). doi:10.35726/jpmp.v2i2.209.
Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail Abu Abdillah al-. “Shahih Al-Bukhari.” In CD-Room Maktabah Syamilah, n.d.
Dedi, Syarial. “The Arisan of Qurban in Islamic Economic Perspective.” AL-FALAH : Journal of Islamic Economics 6, no. 1 (2021): 85–104. doi:10.29240/alfalah.v6i1.2282.
Djazuli, A. Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih; Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah-Masalah Yang Praktis. Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
Hardivizon, and Muhammad Sholihin. “Hybrid Rationality behind Customers’ Choices of the Islamic Banks : An Experience of Bengkulu, Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 11, no. 1 (June 23, 2021): 175–200. doi:10.32350/jitc.111.10.
Hariyanto, B. “Dinamika Ibadah Kurban Dalam Perkembangan Hukum Islam Modern.” JURNAL ILMIAH MIZANI: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi, Dan Keagamaan 5, no. 2 (2018): 151–58. doi:10.29300/mzn.v5i2.1443.
Haroen, Nasrun. Fiqh Muamalah. Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, 2000.
———. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu, 2001.
Ibn ‘Abidin. Radd Al-Muhtar ‘ala al-Dur al-Mukhtar. Egypt: al-Amiriyah, n.d.
Khatib, Al-Syarbaini al-. Mughni Al-Muhtaj. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1978.
Misbach, Irwan. “Siri’ Na Pacce Culture in Retailer Based on Islamic Perspective Business Ethics.” Jurnal Adabiyah 20, no. 2 (2020): 337–50. doi:10.24252/jad.v20i2a7.
Munawwir, A.W. Kamus Al-Munawwir Arab-Indonesia Terlengkap. Surabaya: Progressif, 1997.
Najib, Agus Moh. “Reestablishing Indonesian Madhhab: ‘Urf and the Contribution of Intellectualism.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 58, no. 1 (July 31, 2020): 171–208. doi:10.14421/ajis.2020.581.171-208.
Noviati, Reni. “Praktik Kurban Online Dalam Perspektif Islam Tebar Hewan Kurban THK Di Dompet Dhuafa.” Jurnal Syarikah : Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 3, no. 1 (2017): 343–57. doi:10.30997/jsei.v3i1.716.
Sabiq, Sayid. Fiqh As-Sunah. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1997.
Sholihin, Muhammad, Nurus Shalihin, and Apria Putra. “Paper Money in Sheikh Ahmad Khatib Al-Minangkabawi’s Thought: A Comparative and Critical Commentary.” Islamic Economic Studies 29, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 67–83. doi:10.1108/IES-10-2020-0043.
Syhari, Al-Syaikh ‘Abdullah bin Sa’id Muhammad ‘Ibadi al-Lahji al-Hudharami al-. Idhah Al-Qawa’id al-Fiqhiyyah. al-Haramain, n.d.
Zarqa’, Mustafa Ahmad al-. Al-Madkhal al-Fiqhi al-‘Am al-Islami Fi Tsaubihi al-Jadid. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1968.
———. Al-‘Uqud al-Musammah. Damaskus: Dar al-Kitab, 1968.
Zikri, Khairullah. “Deconstructing Animal Sacrifice (Qurban) In Idul Adha.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 12, no. 2 (July 22, 2011): 235–54. doi:10.14421/esensia.v12i2.711.
Zuhaili, Wahbah al-. Al-Fiqh al-Islami Wa Adillatuh. Damsyiq: Dar Al-Fikr, 1985.