ANALISIS KUALITAS BUKU TEKS MATEMATIKA SMK KELAS XI KURIKULUM 2013 EDISI REVISI TAHUN 2017 BERDASARKAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK
Abstract
This study discusses the quality of Mathematics Textbooks for Class XI Curriculum 2013 Revised 2017 Edition based on a scientific approach. This study aims to find out how the quality of the mathematics textbook is based on indicators in a scientific approach which include: (1) observing, (2) asking questions, (3) digging for information, (4) associating/reasoning and (5) communicating. This research is a quantitative descriptive study that displays the results of the data as they are without any manipulation or other treatment. The procedure in this study consisted of: (1) the preparation stage, by selecting the textbook to be analyzed in this case the researcher took the 2013 Revised 2017 Edition of the Mathematics Textbook of the Ministry of Education and Culture, (2) then collected data using document analysis techniques and carried out literature study using pre-determined instruments, to find out how the quality of the mathematics textbook is based on a scientific approach, (3) drawing conclusions from the data that has been obtained. Chapter I is 60%, Chapter II is 70%, Chapter III is 56%, and Chapter IV is 73%. As for the total number of chapters in the mathematics textbook of SMK class XI semester I, the percentage of quality textbooks based on the scientific approach is 64.75%. So, it can be concluded that the quality of mathematics textbooks for class XI curriculum 2013 based on the scientific approach is included in the "enough" category with the implementation of indicators in the scientific approach.
Downloads
References
Hudojo, H. (2003). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Permendikbud Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Pedoman Evaluasi Kurikulum.
Martin. (2013). Perencanaan pendidikan perspektif proses dan teknik dalam penyusunan rencana pendidikan. Rajawali Press.
MGMP Bahasa Indonesia. (2017). Empat poin penting dari kurikulum 2013 revisi 2017. MGMP Bahasa Indonesia Kemenag Bulukumba. https://mgmpbiblk.wordpress.com/2017/09/10/98/
Mulyasa. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya.
Murtini, W. (2018). The effectiveness of the scientific approach to improve student learning outcomes. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(2), 86–91. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ijal
Muslich, M. (2016). Text book writing dasar-dasar pemahaman, penulisan, dan pemakaian buku teks. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Reston). NCTM.
Permatasari, E. A. (2014). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik dalam kurikulum 2013 pada pembelajaran sejarah. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 3(1), 11–16.
Suherman, E. dkk. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Uno, H. B. (2007). Model pembelajaran menciptakan proses belajar mengajar yang kreatif dan efektif. Bumi Aksara.
Copyright (c) 2022 Muh. Alwan Haris, Andi Kusumayanti, Andi Dian Angriani, Nidya Nina Ichiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).