ANALISIS KUALITAS BUKU TEKS MATEMATIKA SMK KELAS XI KURIKULUM 2013 EDISI REVISI TAHUN 2017 BERDASARKAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK

  • Muh. Alwan Haris Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Andi Kusumayanti Scopus ID: 57205058556, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Muliaty Amin Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Andi Dian Angriani Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Nidya Nina Ichiana Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
Keywords: 2013 curriculum, scientific approach, mathematics textbook

Abstract

This study discusses the quality of Mathematics Textbooks for Class XI Curriculum 2013 Revised 2017 Edition based on a scientific approach. This study aims to find out how the quality of the mathematics textbook is based on indicators in a scientific approach which include: (1) observing, (2) asking questions, (3) digging for information, (4) associating/reasoning and (5) communicating. This research is a quantitative descriptive study that displays the results of the data as they are without any manipulation or other treatment. The procedure in this study consisted of: (1) the preparation stage, by selecting the textbook to be analyzed in this case the researcher took the 2013 Revised 2017 Edition of the Mathematics Textbook of the Ministry of Education and Culture, (2) then collected data using document analysis techniques and carried out literature study using pre-determined instruments, to find out how the quality of the mathematics textbook is based on a scientific approach, (3) drawing conclusions from the data that has been obtained. Chapter I is 60%, Chapter II is 70%, Chapter III is 56%, and Chapter IV is 73%. As for the total number of chapters in the mathematics textbook of SMK class XI semester I, the percentage of quality textbooks based on the scientific approach is 64.75%. So, it can be concluded that the quality of mathematics textbooks for class XI curriculum 2013 based on the scientific approach is included in the "enough" category with the implementation of indicators in the scientific approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andi Kusumayanti, Scopus ID: 57205058556, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ydK3DMcAAAAJ&hl=en

SINTA: http://sinta2.ristekdikti.go.id/authors/detail?id=6202073&view=overview

DECRIPTION

  • I'm a lecturer at Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar. I interest in Mathematics Education. My research about mathematics education.

EDUCATION BACKGROUND

  • Sarjana Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Master Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

EXPERIENCE

  • Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar, 2016 - sekarang
  • Tim Pengelola Pusat Layanan Pengujian dan Analisis Data Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 2017-sekarang
  • Tim Pengelola (Editor) MaPan : Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 2017-sekarang

References

Hudojo, H. (2003). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Permendikbud Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Pedoman Evaluasi Kurikulum.

Martin. (2013). Perencanaan pendidikan perspektif proses dan teknik dalam penyusunan rencana pendidikan. Rajawali Press.

MGMP Bahasa Indonesia. (2017). Empat poin penting dari kurikulum 2013 revisi 2017. MGMP Bahasa Indonesia Kemenag Bulukumba. https://mgmpbiblk.wordpress.com/2017/09/10/98/

Mulyasa. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya.

Murtini, W. (2018). The effectiveness of the scientific approach to improve student learning outcomes. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(2), 86–91. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ijal

Muslich, M. (2016). Text book writing dasar-dasar pemahaman, penulisan, dan pemakaian buku teks. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Reston). NCTM.

Permatasari, E. A. (2014). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik dalam kurikulum 2013 pada pembelajaran sejarah. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 3(1), 11–16.

Suherman, E. dkk. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Uno, H. B. (2007). Model pembelajaran menciptakan proses belajar mengajar yang kreatif dan efektif. Bumi Aksara.

Published
2022-06-01
How to Cite
Muh. Alwan Haris, Kusumayanti, A., Muliaty Amin, Andi Dian Angriani, & Nidya Nina Ichiana. (2022). ANALISIS KUALITAS BUKU TEKS MATEMATIKA SMK KELAS XI KURIKULUM 2013 EDISI REVISI TAHUN 2017 BERDASARKAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK. Al Asma : Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v4i1.29071
Section
Vol. 4 No. 1
Abstract viewed = 172 times