Digitalization of Social Movements in the Metaverse Era: A Study on Mining Resistance in Salipolo, Pinrang Regency, Indonesia
Abstrak
The social movement in Salipolo Village, Pinrang Regency, Indonesia, opposing the development of sand mining, reflects a response to development policies perceived as environmentally destructive and threatening to the livelihoods of the local community. This study aims to explore how digitalization influences the dynamics of this social movement, focusing on the use of social media and data-based technologies as advocacy tools. The research findings show that digital transformation has opened new avenues for the Salipolo community to organize, document environmental impacts, and expand the reach of their movement more broadly. The use of visual data, such as maps of affected areas and environmental impact simulations, has strengthened their position in negotiations with the government and mining companies. This collaboration not only provides moral and material support but also introduces more effective advocacy strategies, broadening the impact of the social movement. The study demonstrates that digitalization has empowered the Salipolo community to fight for justice and policy changes that align more closely with their interests. Therefore, this social movement is not limited to mass actions but also involves the use of technology to strengthen the community's bargaining power in the face of detrimental development policies.
Keywords: Social Movement, Digitalization, Mining Rejection, Cross-Community Collaboration, Digital Advocacy.
Referensi
Castro, A. (2013). Political Ecology and the Power of the People: Environmental Movements in the Global South. Journal of Political Ecology, 20, 135–145.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.
Diani, M. (1992). The Concept of Social Movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.
Dharmawan, A. S. (2020). Dinamika Gerakan Sosial dalam Menentang Pembuangan Limbah Pabrik Kulit. Komunitas, 11(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.20414/komunitas.v11i1.1827
Gunawan, W., Muhamad, R. A. T., & Herdiansah, A. G. (2015). Institusionalisasi Gerakan Lingkungan dalam Menentang Rencana PLTSa di Kota Bandung. Sosiohumaniora, 17(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v17i1.5675
Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology (6th ed.). Polity Press.
Hardani, et al. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu Grup.
Izudin, A., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Gerakan Sosial Warga Parangkusumo pada Kasus Penggusuran Lahan Geo Maritim Park. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 14(1), 109–228. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v14i1.1661
Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Blackwell.
Lestari, S. F. (2019). Gerakan Komunitas Nelayan Tradisional Muara Angke dalam Penolakan Reklamasi Teluk Jakarta. Repository Universitas Airlangga, 1–12. https://repository.unair.ac.id/82210/
Maran, R. R. (2000). Manusia dan Kebudayaan Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Budaya Dasar. Rineka Cipta.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. G., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. G. (1998). A Movement Society. In The Social Movement Society.
Moloeng, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Trias Politika (Nomor 2).
Rucht, D. (2004). The Role of Political Opportunities in the Rise of New Social Movements. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (Eds.), The Social Movements Reader (pp. 61–70). Wiley-Blackwell.
Sugiono, P. D. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.
Sukmana, O. (2016). Konsep Dan Teori Gerakan Sosial. Intrans Publishing.
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements, 1768–2004. Paradigm Publishers.