FEMINIST REIMAGINING IN FAIR ROSALINE: NATASHA SOLOMONS’ REVISION OF ROMEO AND JULIET THROUGH HAROLD BLOOM’S REVISIONARY RATIOS

  • Glory Emanuelle Universitas Gadjah Mada
    (ID)
  • Adiba Qonita Zahroh Universitas Gadjah Mada
    (ID)
Keywords: Fair Rosaline, feminism, reinterpretation, revisionary ratios, Romeo and Juliet

Abstract

The growing inclusivity in today’s literary world offers female writers the chance to explore a wide range of themes even those that were previously considered exclusive for male writers. It led to the re-examination and reinterpretation of classic literature through a feminist lens. This study seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis of Natasha Solomons’ Fair Rosaline through the lens of Harold Bloom’s “Revisionary Ratios.” This paper employs mainly qualitative research design by combining textual analysis and comparative literary criticism to explore Natasha Solomons’ Fair Rosaline as a feminist reinterpretation of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet through the lens of Harold Bloom’s “Revisionary Ratios” theory and feminism literary theory. The texts of Fair Rosaline and Romeo and Juliet serve as the primary data. Not only that this research adds to the larger discussion concerning the place of women in literature while also improving our understanding of Fair Rosaline and its connection to Romeo and Juliet, but also offers new insights into how feminist writers reimagine classical texts and empower female narratives with new, critical perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Androwich, R. (2023, March 7). 'Romeo and Juliet': A classic portrayal of a love story gone awry. The Observer. https://www.ndsmcobserver.com/article/2023/03/romeo-and-juliet-a-classic-portrayal-of-a-love-story-gone-awry
Aughterson, K., & Ferguson, A. G. (2020). Shakespeare and gender: Sex and sexuality in Shakespeare’s drama. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bate, J. (1994). Tragedy and Metamorphosis. In Shakespeare and Ovid (p. 173). Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198183242.003.0005
Bevington, D., & Bauer, P. (2023, November 17). Romeo and Juliet | Summary, Characters, & Facts. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Romeo-and-Juliet
Bloom, H. (1997). The anxiety of influence. Oxford University Press.
Callaghan, D. (2016). A feminist companion to Shakespeare. John Wiley & Sons.
Cartwright, M. (2020, August 5). Education in the Elizabethan Era. World History Encyclopedia. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1583/education-in-the-elizabethan-era/
Daybell, J. (2009). Women’s letters, literature and conscience in sixteenth-century England. Renaissance Studies, 23(4), 516-533. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24419390
Daybell, J. (2010). Gender, Obedience, and Authority in Sixteenth-Century Women’s Letters. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 41(1), 49-67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27867637
Easley, A. (2015). Making a debut. In The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Women's Writing (pp. 13-86). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781107587823
Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (Eds.). (1979). Shakespeare's Sisters: Feminist Essays on Women Poets. Indiana University Press.
McEachern, C. (1988). Fathering herself: A source study of Shakespeare's feminism. Shakespeare Quarterly, 39(3), 269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870927
McKittrick, R. (2006, February 1). How “Romeus” Became “Romeo” | A.R.T. American Repertory Theater. https://americanrepertorytheater.org/media/how-romeus-became-romeo/
Moyer, P. (2024, April 20). Is Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet Just Another Knockoff? Medium. https://medium.com/diy-writing/is-shakespeares-romeo-and-juliet-just-another-knockoff-b8a271e8c216
Novy, M. (2017). Shakespeare and feminist theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Rorintulus, O. A., Wuntu, C. N., Tatipang, D. P., Lolowang, I. S., & Maukar, M. M. (2022). DISCRIMINATIONOVER WOMEN AS DEPICTED IN WALKER’S AND TOHARI’S WORK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Elite : English and Literature Journal, 9(2), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v9i2.32488
Saputri, S. M. D., & Neisya. (2021, December). WOMAN’S STRUGGLE TOWARDS STEREOTYPES INTHE CASE OF THE MISSING MARQUESS: AN ENOLA HOLMES MYSTERY. Elite : English and Literature Journal, 8(2), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.24252/10.24252/elite.v8i2a5
Shakespeare, W. (2012). Romeo And Juliet: Third Series (R. Weis, Ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/romeo-and-juliet-9781903436912/
Shakespeare, W. (n.d.). Romeo and Juliet from The Folger Shakespeare. In B. Mowat, P. Werstine, M. Poston, & R. Niles (Eds.). https://www.folger.edu/explore/shakespeares-works/romeo-and-juliet/read/1/1/
Solomons, N. (2023). Fair Rosaline. Sourcebooks Landmark.
Sontag, S. (2007). At the Same Time: Essays and Speeches (P. Dilonardo, A. Jump, & D. Rieff, Eds.). Hamish Hamilton.
Woolf, V. (2002). A Room of One's Own. Project Gutenberg Australia. https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200791h.html
Zahroh, A. Q. (2023, October). Hereditary Tradition: Analyzing Connections among Detective Depictions in Texts by Poe, Doyle, and King using Harold Bloom’s Revisionary Ratios Theory. Poetika: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra1, 11(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v11i2.84534
Published
2024-12-14
How to Cite
Emanuelle, G., & Zahroh, A. Q. (2024). FEMINIST REIMAGINING IN FAIR ROSALINE: NATASHA SOLOMONS’ REVISION OF ROMEO AND JULIET THROUGH HAROLD BLOOM’S REVISIONARY RATIOS. Elite : English and Literature Journal, 11(2), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v11i2.51285
Abstract viewed = 18 times