FEMINIST REIMAGINING IN FAIR ROSALINE: NATASHA SOLOMONS’ REVISION OF ROMEO AND JULIET THROUGH HAROLD BLOOM’S REVISIONARY RATIOS

  • English English Bahasa Indonesia
    (ID)
  • Adiba Qonita Zahroh Universitas Gadjah Mada
    (ID)

Abstrak

Perkembangan inklusivitas di dunia sastra saat ini memberikan kesempatan bagi penulis perempuan untuk mengeksplorasi berbagai tema yang bahkan sebelumnya dianggap eksklusif untuk penulis laki-laki. Hal ini menyebabkan adanya pengkajian dan penafsiran ulang sastra klasik melalui lensa feminis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan analisis yang komprehensif terhadap novel Fair Rosaline karya Natasha Solomons melalui lensa “Revisionary Ratios” dari Harold Bloom. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian kualitatif dengan menggabungkan analisis tekstual dan kritik sastra komparatif untuk mengeksplorasi novel Fair Rosaline karya Natasha Solomons sebagai reinterpretasi feminis dari Romeo and Juliet karya Shakespeare melalui lensa teori “Revisionary Ratios” dari Harold Bloom dan teori sastra feminisme. Teks Fair Rosaline dan Romeo and Juliet menjadi data primer. Penelitian ini tidak hanya menambah diskusi yang lebih besar mengenai tempat perempuan dalam sastra sekaligus meningkatkan pemahaman kita mengenai Fair Rosaline dan hubungannya dengan Romeo and Juliet, tetapi juga menawarkan wawasan baru mengenai bagaimana penulis feminis menata ulang teks-teks klasik dan memberdayakan narasi perempuan dengan perspektif baru yang kritis.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Referensi

Androwich, R. (2023, March 7). 'Romeo and Juliet': A classic portrayal of a love story gone awry. The Observer. https://www.ndsmcobserver.com/article/2023/03/romeo-and-juliet-a-classic-portrayal-of-a-love-story-gone-awry
Aughterson, K., & Ferguson, A. G. (2020). Shakespeare and gender: Sex and sexuality in Shakespeare’s drama. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bate, J. (1994). Tragedy and Metamorphosis. In Shakespeare and Ovid (p. 173). Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198183242.003.0005
Bevington, D., & Bauer, P. (2023, November 17). Romeo and Juliet | Summary, Characters, & Facts. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Romeo-and-Juliet
Bloom, H. (1997). The anxiety of influence. Oxford University Press.
Callaghan, D. (2016). A feminist companion to Shakespeare. John Wiley & Sons.
Cartwright, M. (2020, August 5). Education in the Elizabethan Era. World History Encyclopedia. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1583/education-in-the-elizabethan-era/
Daybell, J. (2009). Women’s letters, literature and conscience in sixteenth-century England. Renaissance Studies, 23(4), 516-533. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24419390
Daybell, J. (2010). Gender, Obedience, and Authority in Sixteenth-Century Women’s Letters. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 41(1), 49-67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27867637
Easley, A. (2015). Making a debut. In The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Women's Writing (pp. 13-86). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781107587823
Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (Eds.). (1979). Shakespeare's Sisters: Feminist Essays on Women Poets. Indiana University Press.
McEachern, C. (1988). Fathering herself: A source study of Shakespeare's feminism. Shakespeare Quarterly, 39(3), 269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870927
McKittrick, R. (2006, February 1). How “Romeus” Became “Romeo” | A.R.T. American Repertory Theater. https://americanrepertorytheater.org/media/how-romeus-became-romeo/
Moyer, P. (2024, April 20). Is Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet Just Another Knockoff? Medium. https://medium.com/diy-writing/is-shakespeares-romeo-and-juliet-just-another-knockoff-b8a271e8c216
Novy, M. (2017). Shakespeare and feminist theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Rorintulus, O. A., Wuntu, C. N., Tatipang, D. P., Lolowang, I. S., & Maukar, M. M. (2022). DISCRIMINATIONOVER WOMEN AS DEPICTED IN WALKER’S AND TOHARI’S WORK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Elite : English and Literature Journal, 9(2), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v9i2.32488
Saputri, S. M. D., & Neisya. (2021, December). WOMAN’S STRUGGLE TOWARDS STEREOTYPES INTHE CASE OF THE MISSING MARQUESS: AN ENOLA HOLMES MYSTERY. Elite : English and Literature Journal, 8(2), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.24252/10.24252/elite.v8i2a5
Shakespeare, W. (2012). Romeo And Juliet: Third Series (R. Weis, Ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/romeo-and-juliet-9781903436912/
Shakespeare, W. (n.d.). Romeo and Juliet from The Folger Shakespeare. In B. Mowat, P. Werstine, M. Poston, & R. Niles (Eds.). https://www.folger.edu/explore/shakespeares-works/romeo-and-juliet/read/1/1/
Solomons, N. (2023). Fair Rosaline. Sourcebooks Landmark.
Sontag, S. (2007). At the Same Time: Essays and Speeches (P. Dilonardo, A. Jump, & D. Rieff, Eds.). Hamish Hamilton.
Woolf, V. (2002). A Room of One's Own. Project Gutenberg Australia. https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200791h.html
Zahroh, A. Q. (2023, October). Hereditary Tradition: Analyzing Connections among Detective Depictions in Texts by Poe, Doyle, and King using Harold Bloom’s Revisionary Ratios Theory. Poetika: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra1, 11(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v11i2.84534
Diterbitkan
2024-12-14
Abstrak viewed = 18 times