DEVELOPING DILEMMA DISCUSSION METHOD IN AKHLAQ LEARNING TO PROMOTE STUDENT’S MORAL REASONING
Abstract
Abstract:
Enhancing moral reasoning is the main goal of education in the perspective of cognitive-developmental theory. Strategies, approaches or learning methods are chosen based on the effectiveness in changing the level of moral reasoning of students from level of pre-conventional, to conventional and post-conventional. Dilemma Discussion Method has proven its effectiveness in increasing moral reasoning. Therefore, in order to be used in Akhlak learning (part of Pendidikan Agama Islam material) of the classroom, it is important to develop the steps of implementation (syntax) by using the principle of cognitive developmental theory. The results of this Research and Development (R & D) Design indicate that the product in the form of learning syntax from Dilemma Discussion Method is declared as valid with a mean score of 4.38 (greater than the criteria). Thus the product of development research in the form of a dilemma discussion method in learning Akhlaq is worth for being implemented.
Abstrak:
Peningkatan penalaran moral peserta didik merupakan tujuan utama pendidikan dalam perspektif teori cognitive-developmental. Strategi, pendekatan ataupun metode pembelajaran seharusnya dipilih berdasarkan keefektifannya dalam mengubah level penalaran moral peserta didik dari pre-conventional, menuju level conventional dan post-conventional. Metode diskusi dilema telah dibuktikan keefektifannya dalam meningkatkan penalaran moral. Oleh sebab itu, agar dapat digunakan dalam pembelajaran akhlak/moral (bagian dari mata pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam) di kelas, perlu diupayakan pengembangannya berupa langkah-langkah pelaksanaannya (sintak) metode tersebut dengan menggunakan prinsip-prinsip belajar cognitive developmental theory. Hasil penelitian pengembangan (Research & Development) ini menunjukkan bahwa produk berupa sintak pembelajaran dari metode diskusi dilemma dinyatakan valid karena telah memenuhi persyaratan validitas produk yakni mendapatkan skor rerata 4,38. Dengan demikian produk penelitian pengembangan berupa metode diskusi dilema dalam pembelajaran akhlaq layak untuk diimplementasikan.
Downloads
References
Balakrishnan, V. (2009). Teaching Moral Education In Secondary Schools Using Reallife Dilemmas. Victoria University Of Wellington.
Claypoole, S. D., Moody, E. E., & Peace, S. D. (2000). Moral dilemma discussions: An effective group intervention for juvenile offenders. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01933920008411682.
DeVries, R., & Zan, B. S. (1994). Moral Classrooms, Moral Children: Creating a Constructivist Atmosphere an Early Education. New York: Teachers College Press-Columbia University.
Duska, R., & Whelan, M. (1975). Moral Development; A Guide to Piaget and Kohlberg. New York: Paulist Press.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Higgins, A., Power, C., & Kohlberg, L. (1992). Pertautan Suasana Moral terhadap Pertimbangan Tanggung Jawab. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwitz (Eds.), Moralitas, Perilaku Moral, Dan Perkembangan Moral. Jakarta: UI Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development; Implication for Caring and Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holsapple, M. A. (2014). An Examination of Moral Judgment in College: Integrating Developmental and College Impact Frameworks. Michigan University.
Khabibah, S. (2006). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Soal Terbuka untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral Development : A Review of the Theory. Theory Into Practice, 16(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/1475172.
Latif, D. A. (2000). The relationship between pharmacy students’ locus of control, machiavellianism, and moral reasoning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289455348_The_relationship_between_pharmacy_students’_locus_of_control_Machiavellianism_and_moral_reasoning.
Lickona, T. (2005). The Return of Character Education. Iowa: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.
Lind, G. (2002). Moral Dilemma Discussion Revisited; The Konstanz Method. 28th Annual Conference: Conflict, Contradiction, and Contrarian Elements in Moral Development and Education.
Mello, D. (2010). Modeling Cognitive-Affective Dynamics with Hidden Markov Models. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2721–2726. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06b952g5.
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational Psychology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Narvaez, D. (2006). Integrative Ethical Education. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nucci, L. (2015). Moral Development and Education. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Volume 15. Elsevier.
Piaget, J. (1977). Problem in Equlibration. Topics in Cognitive Development. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4175-8_1.
Plomp, T. (1997). Educational and Training System Design. New Nederlands: University of Twente Faculty of Educational Science and Technology.
Power, F. C., Higgins, A., Kohlberg, L., & Reimer, J. (1989). Lawrence Kohlberg’s Approach to Moral Education. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of Learning; Learning Theory and Learning Styles in the Classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Rest, J. R. (1992). Komponen-Komponen Utama Moralitas. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwitz (Eds.), Moralitas, Perilaku Moral, dan Perkembangan Moral. Jakarta: UI Press.
Snarey, J., & Samuelson, P. (2014). Lawrence Kohlberg Revolusionary Ideas: Moral Education in the Cognitive-Developmental Tradition. In L. Nucci, D. Narvaez, & T. Krettenauer (Eds.), Handbook or Moral and Character Education. New York: Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan: Research and Development untuk Bidang Pendidikan, Manajemen, Sosial, Teknik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susilawati, S. (2014). Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Moral dan Religiusitas terhadap Peningkatan Pertimbangan Moral. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Timmerman, P. (2014). Moral Contract Theory and Social Cognition. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Yaqin, A. (2019a). Developing Moral Reasoning Theory Based on Islamic Education Perspective. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-19.2019.13.
Yaqin, A. (2019b). Membentuk Karakter melalui Pendidikan Afeksi. Yogyakarta: Media Akademi.
Yaqin, A. (2019c). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Akhlak Berbasis Kognitif Terhadap Moral Reasoning Siswa. IMTIYAS, 3(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46773/imtiyaz.v3i1.29.
Yaqin, A. (2020). Pendidikan Akhlak-Moral Berbasis Teori Kognitif. Depok: Rajawali Press.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ainul Yaqin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
