ANALYTICAL THINKING SKILLS OF TEACHER CANDIDATE STUDENTS BY APPLYING RESEARCH-BASED LEARNING (RBL) MODEL IN NATURAL SCIENCE
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the analytical thinking skills of prospective teacher students in scientific learning of energy materials by applying a Research-Based Learning model (RBL). This study used a mixed method with a sequential explanatory design. The respondents selected through purposive sampling were 70 students, and 2 of them were for interview data. The research data was collected using a test instrument in the form of 10 essay questions and a non-test in the form of open interviews to students. The average pre-test score for the essay test was 45.71, the post-test score was 68.71, and the N-gain value was 42.37%. These results provide information about analytical thinking skills on energy concepts which are still in the moderate category, so alternative learning strategies are needed to improve the ability of prospective teachers in science learning. This research has recently developed five indicators of analytical thinking skills based on quantitative and qualitative studies on energy materials in science learning.
Abstrak:
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keterampilan berpikir analitis mahasiswa calon guru dalam pembelajaran saintifik materi energi dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran berbasis penelitian (RBL). Penelitian ini menggunakan mixed method dengan desain sequential explanatory. Responden yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling sebanyak 70 siswa, dan 2 diantaranya untuk data wawancara.. Data penelitian dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan instrumen tes berupa 10 soal essay dan non-test berupa wawancara terbuka kepada siswa. Rata-rata nilai pretest tes esai adalah 45,71, nilai posttest 68,71, dan nilai N-gain 42,37%. Hasil tersebut memberikan informasi tentang keterampilan berpikir analitis pada konsep energi yang masih dalam kategori sedang, sehingga diperlukan alternatif strategi pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan kemampuan calon guru dalam pembelajaran sains. Penelitian ini memiliki kebaruan mengembangkan lima indikator kemampuan berpikir analitis berdasarkan kajian kuantitatif dan kualitatif pada materi energi dalam pembelajaran IPA.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Dazu.
Astriani, D., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Lukiati, B. (2018). Profil keterampilan berpikir analitis mahasiswa calon guru IPA dalam perkuliahan biologi umum [Profile of analytical thinking skills of prospective science teacher students in general biology lectures]. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v2n2.p66-70.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1979). Taxonomi of education objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook 1, cognitif domain. London: Longman Group Ltd.
Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102935.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed [Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approach]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fensham, P. J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003.
Fitriah, E. (2017). Model research-based learning etnozoologi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan generik sains dan sikap ilmiah mahasiswa guru biologi. [Ethnozoology research based-learning model to improve generic science skills and scientific attitudes of biology teacher’ stu. Yogyakarta.
Forijati, R. (2019). Model Pembelajaran berbasis riset pada matakuliah ekonomi mikro di Program Magister Pendidikan Ekonomi Pascasarjana Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29100/jupeko.v4i1.1035.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2007). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
Hewitt, P. G., Lyons, S. A., Suchocki, J. A., & Yeh, J. (2013). Conceptual integrated science. New York: Pearson.
Karim, K., & Normaya, N. (2015). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran dalam pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model Jucama di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i1.634.
Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2017). What affects learner’s higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015.
Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing higher level thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1097083.pdf.
Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives: Experts in assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Thousand, CA: Corwin Press.
Montaku, S., Kaittikomol, P., & Tiranathanakul, P. (2012). The model of analytical thinking skill training process. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(1).
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.
Prawita, W., Prayitno, B. A., & Sugiyarto. (2019). Students’ profile about analytical thinking skill on respiratory system subject material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022078.
Ramahwati, S., Chamdani, M., & Salimi, M. (2016). Penerapan model Research Based Learning (RBL) dengan pendekatan saintifik dalam peningkatan pembelajaran IPS pada siswa kelas V SDN 1 Sukomulyo tahun ajaran 2015/2016. Kalam Cendekia Kebumen, 4(1.1). https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/pgsdkebumen/article/view/7991.
Rasheva-Yordanova, K., Iliev, E., & Nikolova, B. (2018). Analytical thinking as a key competence for overcoming the data science divide. 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. https://library.iated.org/view/RASHEVAYORDANOVA2018ANA2.
Sartika, S. B. (2018). Teaching models to increase students’ analytical thinking skills advances in social science. Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR). https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.52.
Sota, C., & Peltzer, K. (2017). The effectiveness of research-based learning among Master Degree student for health promotion and preventable disease, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.226.
Srikoon, S., Bunterm, T., Samranjai, J., & Wattanathorn, J. (2014). Research synthesis of research-based learning for education in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.319.
Sugiyono, S. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tremp, P. (2010). Research-based teaching and learning, A LERU Project. University of Zurich.
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-Century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010.
Yulhendri, Y., Syofyan, E., & Afridona, S. (2019). The development of research-based learning model and journal as for Graduate Students’ Scientific Publications of M. Pd. E on Economic. Internasional Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.8.5.2018.p7764.
Copyright (c) 2022 Suyatman, Muhammad Minan Chusni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
