PENGEMBANGAN TES KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS PESERTA DIDIK MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH DI MAKASSAR
Abstract
Abstrak:
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prosedur pengembangan dan kualitas instrumen tes untuk mengukur kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik Madrasah Tsanawiyah Kota Makassar. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian research and development (R&D) yaitu pengembangan instrumen tes yang terdiri atas: kisi-kisi tes, soal tes, kunci jawaban soal, dan pedoman penilaian. Model pengembangan perangkat ini dikembangkan berdasarkan model pengembangan tipe formative research Tessmer, yaitu: (1) tahap preliminary, (2) tahap self evaluation, (3) tahap prototyping, dan (4) tahap field test. Subjek uji coba dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas 8 MTsN 1 Model Kota Makassar. Berdasarkan hasil uji coba terbatas yang dilakukan, diperoleh bahwa: (1) perangkat pembelajaran sudah dikatakan “valid” karena memiliki nilai CVI sebesar 1 dan reliabilitas tergolong reliabel dengan nilai sebesar 0.742. Hasil rata-rata tingkat kesukaran yaitu 0,362 dengan kategori “sedang”. Hasil rata-rata daya pembeda yaitu 0,367 dengan kategori “baik”, serta hasil rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik yaitu 36,18 dengan kategori kurang sehingga guru agar melatihkan soal-soal kepada peserta didik untuk meningkkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis.
Abstract:
This thesis discusses the development of test instruments to measure students' mathematical reasoning abilities of students of MTsN 1 Model of Makassar City valid, practical and effective. The type of research used is research and development (R & D) research, namely the development of test instruments consisting of: test grille, test questions, answer key questions, and assessment guidelines. This development model was developed based on Tessmer formative research type development model, namely: (1) preliminary stage, (2) self evaluation stage, (3) prototyping stage, and (4) field test stage. The subjects of the experiment in this study were the students of class 8 MTsN 1 Model Makassar City. Based on the results of the limited trial conducted, it is found that: (1) learning devices are said to be "valid" because it has a CVI value of 1 and reliabilities classified reliabel with a value of 0.742. The average yield of the level of difficulty is 0.362 with the category "medium". The average yield of the differentiating power is 0.367 with the category of "good". As well as the average result of students' mathematical reasoning ability is 36.18 with less category so it is still very needed further effort by the teacher in order to provide the problems that can spur the ability of mathematical reasoning.Downloads
References
Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2015). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif, progresif, dan kontekstual. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Amri, S. (2013). Pengembangan dan model pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Dasar–dasar evaluasi pendidikan (edisi revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., & Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 71–80.
Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms (Vol. 775). Springer Science & Business Media.
Emilya, D., Darmawijoyo, D., & Ilma, R. (2013). Pengembangan Soal-Soal Open-Ended Materi Lingkaran Untuk Meningkatkan Penalaran Matematika Peserta didik Kelas 8 Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1o Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2).
English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners. Routledge.
Hamzah, A. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Hapizah, H. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen kemampuan penalaran matematis Mahapeserta didik pada mata kuliah persamaan diferensial. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 5(1), 73–81.
Johnson, H. L. (2012). Reasoning about variation in the intensity of change in covarying quantities involved in rate of change. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 313–330.
Jurnaidi, J., & Zulkardi, Z. (2015). Pengembangan Soal Model Pisa Pada Konten Change And Relationship Untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Peserta didik Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 25–42.
Kusumayanti, A., & Wutsqa, D. (2016). Keefektifan Model Kolb-Knisley Ditinjau Dari Prestasi Belajar, Kemampuan Penalaran, Dan Self-Esteem Peserta didik. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 29–42.
Manfaat, B., Nurhairiyah, S., & Cirebon, I. S. N. (n.d.). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Penalaran Statistik Mahapeserta didik Tadris Matematika. Jurnal Beta.
Mustami, M. (2015). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Aynat Publishing.
Purwanto, N. (2010). Instrumen Penelitian Sosial dan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sa’adah, W. N. (2010). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik kelas 8 SMP Negeri 3 Banguntapan dalam pembelajaran matematika melalui pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI). Skripsi UNY.
Susiana N., S., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2013). Kemampuan penalaran peserta didik kelas 8 dalam menyelesaikan soal kesebangunan. Jurnal Mahapeserta didik Teknologi Pendidikan, 2(1).
Wassid, I., & Sunendar, D. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran bahasa. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).