PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN ASESMEN LITERASI SAINS BERBASIS NILAI-NILAI ISLAM DAN BUDAYA INDONESIA DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL
Abstract
Abstrak:
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah 1) mengembangkan instrumen asesmen literasi sains berbasis nilai-nilai Islam dan Budaya Indonesia dengan pendekatan kontekstual, 2) mengetahui kualitas produk yang telah dikembangkan menurut ahli Pendidikan IPA, pendidikan agama islam, pendidikan budaya, evaluasi pendidikan, dan ahli bahasa, 3) mengetahui hasil uji coba produk dan memberikan contoh produk dengan pendekatan kontekstual. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah lembar validasi ahli IPA, ahli Agama Islam, Ahli Budaya, Bahasa, dan Ahli Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jenis penelitian ini adalah R & D yang mengadaptasi metode Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) Development Process. Kualitas produk yang dikembangkan berkategori “sangat layak”. Hasil uji coba soal literasi sains berbasis nilai-nilai islam dan budaya Indonesia dengan pendekatan kontekstual mendapatkan nilai rata-rata 75,67 untuk hasil penilaian nilai islam; 73,33 untuk hasil penilaian nilai budaya; dan rata-rata 65 untuk hasil penilaian keterampilan literasi sains.
Abstract:
The study aimed: 1) to develop the science literacy assessment instrument based on the Islamic values and Indonesian culture with the contextual approach, 2) to find out the developed product quality according to the experts of the science education, the Islamic education, the cultural education, the educational evaluation, and the linguists (language experts), 3) to examine the results of try-out product and provide the product examples with the contextual approach. The instruments used in this study were validation sheets of science experts, Islamic experts, cultural experts, language experts and educational evaluation experts. The study was R & D (Research and Development) adapting the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) Development Process method. The developed product quality was categorized as "very feasible". The try-out results of the science literacy test based on the Islamic values and the Indonesian culture with the contextual approach got the mean scores of 75.67 for the results of the Islamic values; 73.33 for the results of the cultural value assessment; and 65 for the results of the science literacy skill assessment.
Downloads
References
Asyhari, A. (2015). Profil Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Saintifik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v4i2.91
Asyhari, A. (2017). Literasi Sains Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Islam dan Budaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 06(April), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v6i1.1584
Bashooir, K., & Supahar, S. (2019). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19590
BPS. (2010). Kewarganegaraan, Suku Bangsa, agama, dan Bahasa Sehari-hari Penduduk Indonesia. BPS. Jakarta: Badan Pusat statistik.
Bybee, R., & Mccrae, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 331(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.518644
Chang, H., Chen, J., Guo, C., Chen, C., Chang, C., Lin, S., … Tseng, Y. (2007). Investigating Primary and Secondary Students’ Learning of Physics Concepts in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601073210
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Diger, R., & Laugksch, C. (2000). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview. Inc. Sci. Ed, 84, 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
Fraenkel, Jack R.; Wallen, Norman E; Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). San Fransisco: McGraw Hill.
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Handini, D., Gusrayani, D., & Panjaitan, R. L. (2016). Penerapan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas Iv Pada Materi Gaya. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah2, 1(1), 451–460.
Johnson, E. B. (2011). No TitleaContextual Teaching and Learning. Bandung: Kaifa Learning.
Kurniawan, N. M., & Sumiati, T. (2015). Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (Ctl) Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Sekolah Dasar. Metodik Didaktik, 10(1), 16–22.
Milligan, A., & Wood, B. (2010). Conceptual understandings as transition points: Making sense of a complex social world. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(4), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903494287
Nasional, Kementerian Pendidikan, B. P. K. (2010). Penguatan Metodologi Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Nilai-Nilai Budaya Untuk Membentuk Daya Saing Dan Karakter Bangsa.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en
Rahmat. (2004). Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Islam dalam Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup. Kependidikan Islam, 2(1), 23–43.
Wamendikbud. (2014). Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.
Winaryati, E. S. S. (2012). Model Evaluasi Dalam Supervisi Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Lima Domain Sains. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2), 492–510.
Yuniarti, N. S. (2016). Validitas Konstrak Instrumen Evaluasi Outcome Lembaga Pendidikan Guru Vokasional, 20(2), 221–233.
Copyright (c) 2019 Ardian Asyhari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
