ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN GURU IPA DALAM MELAKUKAN PENILAIAN KETERAMPILAN
Abstract
Abstrak:
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan guru-guru IPA SMP dalam menyusun instrumen penilaian keterampilan. Penelitian deskriptif ini melibatkan 25 guru IPA SMP anggota MGMP Kabupaten dan Kota Kediri yang memiliki pengalaman mengajar lebih dari lima tahun. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah metode tes menggunakan intrumen validasi uji keterampilan. Kemampuan guru dalam menyusun intrumen ditentukan berdasarkan rubrik penilaian yang dibuat oleh peneliti yang kemudian dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar guru peserta penelitian belum terampil dalam menyusun instrumen penilaian keterampilan. Kesulitan mereka terutama terletak pada pembuatan kisi-kisi, petunjuk pelaksanaan tugas dan rubrik penilaian. Implikasi dari penelitian ini juga dibahas lebih lanjut.
Abstract:
The study aimed to analyze the teachers’ ability to develop the assessment instrument of the students’ skills in science. This descriptive study was conducted by involving 25 in-service science teachers who have more than five years teaching experiences at the secondary level. Those teachers are the members of the Teacher Association in Kediri region. In this study, the intended information was collected by using the instrument of skill test validation. The teachers’ abilities in developing the instrument for assessing students’ skills in science were determined by using the assessment criteria developed by the researchers. The data then were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The findings indicated that most of the teachers had the difficulties in developing the instruments for assessing students’ skills in science. Most of the teachers were difficult to create blue prints, task instructions, and rubrics for assessment. In addition, the implications of the research findings were discussed further.
Downloads
References
Akben, N. (2015). Improving science process skills in science and technology course activities using the inquiry method. Egitim ve Bilim, 40(179).
Aydinli, E., Dokme, I., Ünlüa, Z. K., Öztürk, N., Demir, R., & Benli, E. (2011). Turkish elementary school students’ performance on integrated science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3469-3475. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.320
Azwar, S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas (4 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Basuki, I., & Hariyanto. (2016). Asesmen pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bond, C. E., Philo, C., & Shipton, Z. K. (2011). When there isn't a right answer: Interpretation and reasoning, key skills for twenty‐first century geoscience. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 629-652.
Çakır, N. K., & Sarıkaya, M. (2010). An evaluation of science process skills of the science teaching majors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1592-1596.
Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2011). Development of a three-tier test to assess high school students' understanding of acids and bases. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 600-604.
Chu, H.-E., & Treagust, D. (2014). Secondary students’ stable and unstable optics conceptions using contextualized questions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 238-251.
Clarke, J. L., & Boud, D. (2018). Refocusing portfolio assessment: Curating for feedback and portrayal. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 479-486.
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Emtha. (2017). Penilaian keterampilan dalam kurikulum 2013. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://emtha1110.blogspot.com/2017/05/penilaian-keterampilan-dalam-kurikulum.html
Enggarwati, N. S. (2015). Kesulitan guru SD Negeri Glagah dalam mengimplementasikan penilaian autentik pada Kurikulum 2013. BASIC EDUCATION, 5(12).
Fauziah, A. N. M., Martini, & Sabtiawan, W. B. (2018). Penyusunan instrumen penilaian guru-guru ipa kabupaten banyuwangi. Jurnal Abdi: Media Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 1-5.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Glencoe, M.-H. (2006). Performance assessment in the science classroom. Orion Place, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Istiyono, E., & Kadarisman, N. (2017). Pelatihan Penyusunan Instrumen Penilaian Ranah Psikomotor (Keterampilan) Bagi Guru-Guru Fisika SMA/MA di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA, 1(2), 81-84.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful assessment: A manageable and cooperative process. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017a). Modul pengembangan instrumen penilalain oleh pendidik mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam sekolah menengah pertama. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017b). Panduan penilaian oleh pendidik dan satuan pendidikan untuk sekolah menengah pertama. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kuhn, D., Arvidsson, T. S., Lesperance, R., & Corprew, R. (2017). Can engaging in science practices promote deep understanding of them? Science Education, 101(2), 232-250.
Lamb, S., Maire, Q., & Doecke, E. (2017). Key Skills for the 21st Century: an evidence-based review.
Lay, Y.-F., Khoo, C.-H., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2013). Assessing Secondary School Students' Understanding of the Relevance of Energy in Their Daily Lives. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 199-215.
Maba, W., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2017). An Analysis of Assessment Models Employed by The Indonesian Elementary School Teachers. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(1), 39-45.
Maier, U., Wolf, N., & Randler, C. (2016). Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types. Computers & Education, 95, 85-98.
Marjan, J., Arnyana, I. B. P., & Setiawan, I. G. A. N. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Pendekatan Saintifik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa MA. Mu allimat NW Pancor Selong Kabupaten Lombok Timur Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1).
Owen, L. (2016). The Impact of Feedback as Formative Assessment on Student Performance. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(2), 168-175.
Pujawan, I. G. N. (2017). Pelatihan penyusunan instrumen penilaian autentik bagi guru-guru sekolah dasar gugus v kecamatan kubu dalam rangka implementasi kurikulum 2013. WIDYA LAKSANA, 4(1), 27-33.
Purnawanto. (2018). Penilaian keterampilan kurikulum 2013 SMP/MTs (Bag 2). [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://blog.igi.or.id/penilaian-ketrampilan-kurikulum-2013-smp-mts-bag-2.html
Rahayu, E., Susanto, H., & Yulianti, D. (2011). Pembelajaran sains dengan pendekatan keterampilan proses untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 7(2).
Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435-448.
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166-178.
Setiawan, H., Sa’dijah, C., & Akbar, S. d. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen autentik kompetensi pada ranah keterampilan untuk pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 874-882.
Shahali, E. H., Halim, L., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. (2017). Primary school teachers’ understanding of science process skills in relation to their teaching qualifications and teaching experience. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 257-281.
Sudibyo, E., Nurita, T., & Fauziah, A. N. M. (2018). Penggunaan lembar kerja berorientasi pendekatan keterampilan proses untuk melatihkan keterampilan proses sains siswa SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 21-26.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Penelitian memberikan deskripsi, eksplanasi, prediksi, inovasi, dan juga dasar-dasar teoretis bagi pengembangan pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suratno, S., & Kurniati, D. (2017). Implementasi model pembelajaran math-science berbasis performance assessment untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa di daerah perkebunan kopi Jember.
Trianto. (2011). Model pembelajaran terpadu: Konsep, strategi, dan implementasinya dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Uno, H. B., & Koni, S. (2016). Assessment pembelajaran: Salah satu bagian penting dari pelaksanaan pembelajaran yang tidak dapat diabaikan adalah penilaian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wahyudi, L. E., & Supardi, Z. I. (2013). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada pokok bahasan kalor untuk melatihkan keterampilan proses sains terhadap hasil belajar di SMAN 1 Sumenep. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 2(02).
Wangid, M. N., Mustadi, A., Senen, A., & Herianingtyas, N. L. R. (2017). The evaluation of authentic assessment implementation of Curriculum 2013 in Elementary School. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(1), 104-115.
Widodo, E., Maryanto, A., & Setyawarno, D. (2017). Pelatihan Penyusunan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Menafsirkan Grafik Bagi Guru IPA Tingkat SMP di Sleman, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA, 1(1), 52-57.
Copyright (c) 2019 Enny Susiyawati, Wahono Widodo, Siti Nurul Hidayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
