LITERASI PENGETAHUAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN MENULIS
Abstract
Abstract: This paper aimed at describing the development of human capabilities in expressing ideas into writing. The method used was content analysis to study the various references related to the themes. The results were summarized: 1) sys-tematized ideas in writing was influenced by systematized ideas in speech language; 2) the development of the idea was influenced by the acquisition of knowledge; 3) developing writing literacy were through literacy knowledge; 4) the stronger a person's literacy knowledge, the stronger the possibility to influence others through writing.
Abstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan perkembangan kemampuan manusia dalam menuangkan pengetahuannya ke dalam tulisan. Metode yang digunakan adalah content analysis dengan mempelajari berbagai referensi yang terkait dengan tema. Hasilnya disimpulkan: 1) sistimatika gagasan dalam tulisan dipengaruhi oleh sistimatika gagasan dalam bahasa tutur; 2) pengembangan gagasan dipengaruhi oleh penguasaan pengetahuan; 3) literasi tulis berkembang melalui literasi pengetahuan; 4) makin kuat literasi pengetahuan seseorang, makin kuat kemungkinannya untuk mempengaruhi orang lain melalui tulisan.
Downloads
References
Agnes, Michael. Webster’s New World College Dictionary. New Delhi: IDG Books, 2000.
Anderson, Lorin W. dan David R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wasley Longman, 2001.
Appleby, Yvon, et al. “Literacy and Esol: Shared and Distinctive Knowledge, Understanding and Professional Practice” Companion guide to the Application of the Professional Standards for Teachers of English (Literacy and ESOL) in the Lifelong Learning Sector (June 2007). London: Lifelong Learning UK, 2009.
Bazerman, Charles dan Paul Prior, What Writing Does and How How it Does it, An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
Carnoy, Martin dan Henry M. Levin. The Limits of Educational Reform. New York: David McKay Company, Inc, tt.
Delors, Jacques. et al. “Learning the Treasure Within”, Report to UNESCO of The International Commission on Education for Twenty-First Century. Paris: UNESCO, 1998.
Despres, Charles dan Daniele Chauvel, Knowledge Horizons. Boston: Butterworth-Heinermann, 2000.
Elbow, Peter. Everyone Can Write. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Entwistle, Harold. Class, Culture and Education. London: University of Cambridge, 1979.
Gee, James Paul. Sosial Linguistics and Literacies. New York: Routledge, 2008.
Gillen, Julia dan David Barton. Digital Literacies: A Research Briefing by The Technology Enhance Learning Phase of The Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: TLRP – ESRC - EPSRC, 2010.
Gould, Eric, Robert Di Yanni dan William Smith. The Act of Writing. Toronto: Random House, 1989.
Horton, William. E-Learning by Design (San Fransisco: John & Willey & Sons, 2006).
Jackson, Susan E., Michael A. Hitt, dan Angelo S. Denisi. Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
Jennex, Murray A. Knowledge Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. New York: Information Science Reference, 2008.
McCrimmon, James. Writing with Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1984.
McGinn, Colin. Problems in Philosophy: The limits of Inquiry. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1993.
Nahapiet, Janine dan Shumantra Ghoshal, “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and The Organizational Advantage.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 2, 1998, h. 244. http://www.jstor.org/ (diakses 19 Juni 2013).
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of The Word. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Ontario Education. “Literacy For Learning” Report of the Expert Panel on Literacy (Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Education, 2004), h. 5.
Reigeluth, Charles M. Instructional Theories in Action, Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987.
Richard, Jack C. dan Willy A. Renandya, Methodology in Language Teaching: an Antology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
UNESCO Education Sector. The Plurality of Literacy and Its Implication for Policies and Programmes; Position Paper. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2004.
UNESCO. “Education For All, Literacy For Live.” EFA Global Monitoring Report. Paris; UNESCO Publishing, 2005.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
