ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL IN THE LEARNING PROCESS IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL/MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH TEACHERS IN KONAWE DISTRICT
Abstract
Abstract:
This quantitative causal study aims to determine the technology acceptance in the learning process among SMP/MTs teachers in Konawe, Southeast Sulawesi. Cluster random sampling was used to select the sample, considering the sampling area. The data collection was carried out through survey techniques using a questionnaire. The results show that the experience has a significant effect on perceived ease of use; both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a significant effect on usage attitudes; the usage attitude, in turn, has a significant effect on the behavioral intention to use at α = 0.05. Whereas at α = 0.1, the innovativeness variable affects the perception of perceived usefulness, and facilitating conditions affect the perception of perceived ease of use. The influence of experience and facility conditions is the key for teachers to easily accept and use learning technology. Experience is also related to teachers' perceptions of the usefulness of technology in classroom learning. This requires teachers to continue to improve their skills. School leaders and policy makers are also expected to pay more attention to teacher skills and facilities that support the implementation of learning in the classroom. The more positive and interested teachers are in using learning technology, the easier it is for them to accept the technology.
Abstrak:
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif kausalitas yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerimaan teknologi dalam proses pembelajaran pada populasi guru-guru SMP/MTs di Kabupaten Konawe Sulawesi Tenggara. Sampel dipilih menggunakan cluster random sampling, dengan memperhatikan wilayah pengambilan sampel. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan teknik survei menggunakan angket. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengalaman (Experience) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap presepsi kemudahan dalam menggunakan (Perceived Ease of Use); presepsi kegunaan yang dirasakan (Perceived Usefulness) dan kemudahan dalam menggunakan (Perceived ease of use) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap sikap untuk menggunakan (Attitudde toward using); sikap untuk menggunakan (Attitude toward using) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap niat/minat untuk menggunakan (Behavioral Intention to Use) pada = 0,05. Sedangkan pada = 0,1 variabel Inovasi (Innovativeness) berpengaruh terhadap presepsi kegunaan yang dirasakan (Perceived Usefulness); dan kondisi fasilitas (Facilitating Conditions) berpengaruh terhadap presepsi kemudahan dalam menggunakan (Perceived Ease of Use). Berpengaruhnya pengalaman dan kondisi fasilitas menjadi kunci bagi guru agar mudah menerima dan menggunakan teknologi pembelajaran. Pengalaman juga berkaitan dengan persepsi guru akan kegunaan teknologi dalam pembelajaran di kelas. Hal ini mengharuskan guru untuk terus meningkatkan keterampilannya. Pimpinan sekolah dan para pemangku kebijakan juga diharapkan lebih memperhatikan keterampilan guru serta fasilitas yang menunjang pelaksanaan pembelajaran di kelas. Semakin positif dan tertarik guru dalam menggunakan teknologi pembelajaran, maka semakin mudah mereka menerima teknologi tersebut.
Downloads
References
Abubakari, M. S., & Zakaria, G. A. N. (2023). Technology Acceptance Model in Islamic Education (TAMISE) for Digital Learning: Conceptual Framework Proposal. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 3(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v3i4.153.
Aini, N. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Multimedia Interaktif di Kelas VII SMPN 3 Kendari. IAIN Kendari.
Akar, S. G. M. (2019). A Structural Model for Relationship between Web Pedagogic Content Knowledge and Technology Acceptance of Preservice Teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.01.001.
Alsaffar, R. D., Alfayly, A., & Ali, N. (2022). Extended Technology Acceptance Model for Multimedia-Based Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1754.
Anindita, R., Lukito, L., & Amalia, L. (2023). Teachers and Technostress During Covid-19 Pandemic : A Modification of Technology Acceptance Model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Humanities, Social Science (ICEHoS 2022), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-088-6.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (R. Damayanti (ed.); 2nd ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ayele, A. A., & Birhanie, W. K. (2018). Acceptance and use of e-learning systems: the case of teachers in technology institutes of Ethiopian Universities. Applied Informatics, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40535-018-0048-7.
Azmi, K., Zasmita, A. A., & Sholihat, N. (2021). Science Teacher Technology Acceptance Model On Zoom Cloud Meeting Application. Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA Dan Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.15548/nsc.v7i2.3089.
Budiman, K., Arifudin, R., Sugiharti, E., Abidin, Z., & Purwinarko, A. (2020). Analisis Keberterimaan Pengguna Terhadap Penerapan Online Assesment Tool Ditengah Pembatasan Sosial Covid-19 Menggunakan Technology Acceptence Model. In A. M. Muslim, A. Purwinarko, B. Prasetiyo, T. A. Putra, R. Hijriyani, A. Adiansya, A. Khasanah, K. Laksono, & R. I. Aditya (Eds.), Seminar Nasional Ilmu Komputer (SNIK 2020) (pp. 89–97). Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
Dishaw, M. T., Strong, D. M., & Bandy, D. B. (2002). Extending the task-technology fit model with self-efficacy constructs. Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1021–1027. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2002/143.
Dumpit, D. Z., & Fernandez, C. J. (2017). Analysis of the use of social media in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0045-2.
Elizabeth, T., & Tinaliah, T. (2021). Analisis Sistem Pembelajaran Online XYZ Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). EXPERT: Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi, 11(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.36448/expert.v11i1.1959.
Fahmiyah, I., Utami, I. Q., Ningrum, R. A., Fakhruzzaman, M. N., Pratama, A. I., & Triangga, Y. M. (2023). Examining the Effect of Teacher’s Age Difference on Learning Technology Adoption Using Technology Acceptance Model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2536(May). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0123943.
Frøsig, T. B. (2017). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Consider Teachers Needs and Concerns in the Design of Educational Technology (EdTAM). JET: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(November 2017), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i16.42319.
Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression and Structural Equation Models. In Garson (3rd ed.). Asheboro: Statistical Associates Publishing.
Gerhana, Y. A., Irfan, M., & Cepy, S. (2017). Implementasi Technology Acceptance Model Untuk Mengukur Penerimaan Guru Terhadap Inovasi Pembelajaran (Studi Kasus Model Pembelajaran CBR di SMA). Istek, X(2), 52–67. https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/istek/article/view/1474.
Ghozali, I., & Fuad. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi dengan Program LISREL 8.80 (3rd ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 Untuk Penelitian Empiris (2nd ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Hong, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Q. (2021). Preschool Teachers’ Technology Acceptance During the COVID-19: An Adapted Technology Acceptance Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691492.
Jatmikowati, T. E., Rachman, A. U., & Adwitiya, A. B. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model in using E-learning on Early Childhood Teacher Education Program’s student during pandemic. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(2), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i2.801.
Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1320–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014.
Lee, S. M., Kim, I., Rhee, S., & Trimi, S. (2006). The role of exogenous factors in technology acceptance : The case of object-oriented technology The role of exogenous factors in technology acceptance : The case of object-oriented technology. Information & Management, 42(2006), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.11.004.
Lestari, A. F., Amalia, H., & Puspita, A. (2021). Penerimaan Teknologi Zoom Cloud Meeting terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa Dari Rumah Dengan TAM. INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Informatika, 6(1), 27--36. https://doi.org/10.35314/isi.v6i1.1857.
Liao, Y. K., Wu, W. Y., Le, T. Q., & Phung, T. T. T. (2022). The Integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Value-Based Adoption Model to Study the Adoption of E-Learning: The Moderating Role of e-WOM. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020815.
Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to Higher-Education Students’ Use of Digital Academic Reading Tools on Computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8.
Nabilah, Z., Hermuningsih, S., & Gendro, W. (2020). Pengaruh Operating Leverage Dan Likuiditas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Struktur Modal Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perusahaan Sektor Consumer Goods Industry Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2016 - 2018. Bisman (BIsnis & Manajemen), 3(2015), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.37112/bisman.v3i2.794.
Naibaho, R. S. (2017). Peranan Dan Perencanaan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Perusahaan. Jurnal Warta, 52(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i52.253.
Övez, F. T. D., & Demİr, S. (2023). Examination of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers ’ Digital Literacy Self-Efficacy , E-learning Readiness , Technology Acceptance Levels , and Attitudes Towards Distance Education. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(October), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1352405.
Rahmawati, R. N., & Narsa, I. M. (2019). Penggunaan e-learning dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.26232.
Rimawati, E., Vulandari, R. T., & Prabowo, I. A. (2018). Analisis Technology Acceptance Model Dalam Pemanfaatan Internet Sebagai Media Belajar Siswa. In P. Hadi, Sarsono, H. A. A. Putri, N. Oktyajati, & R. Y. Seto (Eds.), Prosiding Diseminasi Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Lembaga Penelitian Pengembangan dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (pp. 70–82). Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta.
Salsabila, U. H., Sari, L. I., Lathif, K. H., Lestari, A. P., & Ayuning, A. (2020). Peran Teknologi Dalam Pembelajaran Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 17(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v17i2.138.
Saptomo, W. L. Y., & Rimawati, E. (2020). Path Analisis Technology Acceptance Model pada Penerapan Blended Learning. Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, 6(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v6i2.235.
Setiyani, L., Effendy, F., & Slamet, A. A. (2021). Using Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM 3) at Selected Private Technical High School: Google Drive Storage in E-Learning. Utamax : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 3(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v3i2.6746.
Sinaga, A. V. (2023). Peranan Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran untuk Membentuk Karakter dan Skill Peserta Didik Abad 21. Journal on Education, 06(01), 2836–2846. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3324.
Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi Siswa Pada Pelajaran Matematika: Studi Pendahuluan Pada Siswa yang Menyenangi Game. In I. P. Perkembangan (Ed.), Prosiding Temu Ilmiah X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia (pp. 224–232). HIMPSI. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ippi/article/view/2193.
Srinadi, N. L. P., & Puspita, N. N. H. (2017). Implementasi Technology Acceptance Model pada Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Konferensi Nasional Sistem & Informatika 2017, 170–174. https://knsi.stikom-bali.ac.id/index.php/eproceedings/article/view/32.
Suparman, A. (2020). Pengaruh Penerimaan Teknologi Dalam Pembelajaran E-Learning Terhadap Peningkatan Minat Belajar Siswa (Studi Kasus Di Smk Pasundan Subang). Ijd-Demos, 1(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.31506/ijd.v1i2.18.
Syafrizal, A., Ernawati, E., & Dwiandiyanta, B. Y. (2015). Penerapan Model Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk Pemahaman Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Multimedia Interaktif. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 2(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v2i1.4524.
Teo, T. (2011). Technology Acceptance in Education. In Technology Acceptance in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-487-4.
Teo, T. (2012). Modelling the Influences of Beliefs on Pre- Service Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Computer Use. 3(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.1.13.
Copyright (c) 2023 Syamsuddin, Samrin, Tandri Patih, Puguh Resmono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
