Violation of The Law in The Case of Divorce Verstek
Abstract
The research aims to answer the problem of legal violations in verstek divorce cases. This research is an empirical legal research with a qualitative approach, and data collection in this research uses observation, interview, and data analysis techniques. This research found that in verstek divorce cases, violations of the law can occur if there are violations of procedures or rights guaranteed by law in the divorce process. The following are some examples of legal violations that may occur in verstek divorce cases, namely violation of the rights of absent parties, non-compliance with procedural requirements, violation of the rights of absent parties in the decision, fraud or manipulation in the divorce process. Forms of violation of taklik talak which are used as reasons for filing for divorce, among others, leaving the wife for 2 consecutive years, not providing mandatory maintenance for 3 months, hurting the wife's body / body or, neglecting or not caring for the wife for 6 months or more.
Keywords: Violations Law; Divorce; Verstek
References
Abdullah, Taufik. Analisis Putusan Verstek Perkara Cerai Talak Perspektif Keadilan Sosial (Studi Analisis Putusan Verstek Perkara Nomor 0520/Pdt.G/2014 PA.Kab.Kediri). Jawa Timur: Dimar Intermedia, 2020.
Ali, Ernawaty Hadji, and Dedi Sumanto. “Putusan Verstek Merupakan Putusan Yang Dijatuhkan Oleh Majelis Hakim Tanpa Hadirnya Tergugat.” Jurnal Al-Himayah 5, no. 1 (2021): 50–64.
Amaliah, Rezki, Dachran S. Busthami, and Anggreany Arief. “Penerapan Putusan Verstek Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas LI Majene.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS) 2, no. 3 (2021): 1344–51.
Andaryuni, Lilik. “Putusan Verstek Dalam Cerai Gugat Karena Pelanggaran Taklik Talak Di Pengadilan Agama Samarinda.” IstinbáthJurnal of Islamic Law 16, no. 1 (2017): 224–40.
Andreas, Darren, and Ariawan Ariawan. “Penerapan Teori Keadilan Dalam Putusan Verstek.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 7, no. 1 (2023): 633–39. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.4483.
Arto, A. Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset, n.d.
Azizah, Linda. “Analisis Perceraian Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Hukum X, no. 4 (2012): 415–22.
Dahwadin, Enceng Iip Syaripudin, Eva Sofiawati, and Muhamad Dani Somantri. “Hakikat Perceraian Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 11, no. 7 (2020): 93.
Distiliana, and Herlinsi. “Hukum Perceraian Karena Kemurtadan Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Palembang 20, no. 2 (2022): 243–55.
Djawas, Mursyid, Ridhwan, Soraya Devy, and Asmaul Husna. “The Government’s Role in Decreasing Divorce Rates in Indonesia: The Case of Aceh and South Sulawesi.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 21, no. 1 (2021): 163–88.
Flood, Sarah M., and Katie R. Genadek. “Time for Each Other: Work and Family Constraints Among Couples.” Journal of Marriage and Family 78, no. 1 (2016): 142–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12255.
Hafizh, Abdul. “Pelaksanaan Taklik Talak Dalam Hukum Perkawinan (Studi Pada Wilayah KUA Kec. Padang Barat Dan Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Padang Tahun 2010-2013).” Ijtihad 35, no. 2 (2019).
Isnawati, Rais. “Tingginya Angka Cerai Gugat (Khulu’) Di Indonesia; Analisis Kritis Terhadap Penyebab Dan Alternatif Solusi Mengatasinya.” Al-‘Adalah Vol. XII, no. 1 (2014): 1–14.
Jamil, Abdul, and Muliadi Nur. “Perlindungan Hukum Dan Keadilan Para Pihak Melalui Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Putusan Verstek Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 29, no. 2 (May 2022): 439–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art10.
Julijanto, Muhammad, Masrukhin Masrukhin, and Ahmad Kholis Hayatuddin. “Dampak Perceraian Dan Pemberdayaan Keluarga Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Wonogiri.” BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 1, no. 1 (2016): 55–77. https://doi.org/10.22515/bg.v1i1.71.
Junaedi, Mahfudz. “Fenomena Perceraian Dan Perubahan Sosial: Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Wonosobo.” Syariati : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 4, no. 01 (2018): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v4i01.1166.
Kasim, Nur Mohamad, and Trubus Semiaji. “Divorce Cases in Members of Indonesian Police Force: A Positive Law Perspective.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah 20, no. 1 (2022): 91. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v20i1.1793.
Mariana, and Ibrahim. “Peran DPR Dalam Pengangkatan Duta Besar Setelah Amandemen UUD 1945.” Jurnal Tahqiqa 15, no. 1 (2021): 1–14.
Mariana, Mariana, and Amsanul Amri. “Hawalah Mutlaqah Dalam Perspektif Syafi’iyah Dan Hanafiyah.” SINTESA: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Sosial Keagamaan 1, no. 2 (2021): 136–47.
Mariana, and Muhammad Murthaza. “Etika Bisnis Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Pada Swalayan Kota Sigli).” Tahqiqa 13, no. 1 (2019): 62–72.
Nisa, Haiyun, and Koentjoro Koentjoro. “Some Issues about Women Who File for Divorce in Aceh.” Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies 8, no. 1 (2022): 74. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v8i1.12237.
Nufiar, Mariana, and Muhammad Ali. “Settlement of Problematic Loans in the Unit Pengelola Kegiatan (UPK) of Pidie District Did Sharia.” Journal of Social Science 1, no. 4 (2020): 147–51. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsss.v1i4.55.
Nufiar, Rahmad, Safriadi, and Mariana. “Determination Of The Cost Maintenance Of Pawned Goods In Islamic Law The Perspective.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 15, no. 3 (2022): 1561–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-002107.
Panji, M A, Permohonan Izin, Ikrar Talak, Moch Abdul Panji, Liliek Istiqomah, Ikarini Dani Widiyanti, Jurusan Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Jember Unej. “Permohonan Izin Ikrar Talak Yang Ditolak Karena Tidak Memenuhi Kualifikasi Surat Permohonan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 184 K / AG / 2009 ) The Rejection Of Pledge Divorce Tender Because Of The Unfulfilled 184 K / AG / 2009 ).” Atikel Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa 1, no. 1 (2013): 1–5.
Purnamasari, Fitri, Diding Rahmat, and Gios Adhyaksa. “Pelaksanaan Mediasi Pada Penyelesaian Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan.” UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (2017): 98. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v4i2.729.
Putri, Elfirda Ade. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perceraian Akibat Perselisihan Terus Menerus.” Jurnal Hukum Sasana 7, no. 1 (2021): 163–81. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i1.618.
Rusydi, Bustanul Arifien. “Problem Kehadiran Dan Upaya Hukum Tergugat Dalam Putusan Verstek Perkara Perceraian Pada Pengadilan Agama Bandung.” Muslim Heritage 5, no. 2 (2020): 393. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v5i2.2362.
Sahlan, Muhammad. “Perceraian, Sosiologi.” Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 14, no. 1 (2012): 88–97.
Sujana, I Nyoman. “Akibat-Akibat Hukum Perceraian Dalam Perkawinan Campuran.” Jurnal Notariil 1, no. 2 (2017): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.2.1.154.58-67.
The authors of a work hold the copyright and grant the Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan the right of first publication. The work is also licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which enables others to share the work while acknowledging the authorship and initial publication in the journal. The authors can make separate contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work, such as by posting it to an institutional repository or editing it for a book, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online, such as in institutional repositories or on their website, before and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of the published work.
