AN EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL ON NATURAL SCIENCE LEARNING
Abstract
This study analyzes the quality of preparation, process, and learning outcomes in applying the discovery learning model. The method used in this research was evaluation with the Countenance Stake model. The population of this research was natural science students and teachers throughout Indonesia. The sample was the seventh-grade students from Sleman Regency and teachers representing several provinces. Data collection was through document review, observation sheets, and teacher and student questionnaires. Data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive technique. The results of this study indicated that the quality of the preparation and implementation process of the discovery learning model was quite good. Student learning outcomes were fairly good but had not applied assessments of critical skill, problem-solving, creativity, and innovation as a requirement of 21st-century learning evaluation. The study results were expected to provide an overview of the quality of teacher preparation, process, and learning outcomes in applying the discovery learning model.
Abstrak:
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kualitas persiapan, proses, dan hasil belajar dalam menerapkan model discovery learning. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian evaluasi dengan model Countenance Stake. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa dan guru IPA se-Indonesia dengan sample siswa berasal dari Kabupaten Sleman serta guru dari perwakilan beberapa provinsi. Pengumpulan data menggunakan lembar telaah dokumen, lembar observasi, angket guru, dan angket siswa. Data dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kualitas persiapan dan proses pelaksanaan model discovery learning sudah cukup baik. Hasil belajar siswa cukup baik, namun belum menerapkan penilaian keterampilan kritis, pemecahan masalah, kreativitas dan inovasi sebagai tuntutan dalam penilaian pembelajaran abad 21. Hasil penelitian diharapkan dapat memberikan gambaran umum tentang kualitas persiapan, proses, dan hasil belajar guru dalam menerapkan model discovery learning.
Downloads
References
Agustina, R. D., Chusni, M. M., & Ijharudin, M. (2019). Efficacy and Potential of Physics Education Students in Mathematical Physics Subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1), 12178. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012178.
Al-Azawei, A., & Al-Masoudy, M. (2020). Predicting Learners’ Performance in Virtual learning Environment (VLE) Based on Demographic, Behavioral and Engagement Antecedents. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(9), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i09.12691.
Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The Development of Integrated Science Instructional Materials to Improve Students’ Digital Literacy in Scientific Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613.
Chang, Y., Li, B. D., Chen, H. C., & Chiu, F. C. (2015). Investigating the Synergy of Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking in the Course of Integrated Activity in Taiwan. Educational Psychology, 35(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410. 2014.920079.
Chusni, M M, Rahardjo, S. B., & Saputro, S. (2020). Profile of Multi-modal Representation Ability of Junior High School Students on Science Material in Sleman District. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1), 12107. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/1511/1/012107.
Chusni, Muhammad Minan, Setya, W., Agustina, R. D., & Malik, A. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Berbasis Saintifik bagi Calon Guru Fisika. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v6i2.1952.
Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning Teachers Moving Toward Effective Elementary Science Teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sce.20311.
Dewi, I. P. M., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Wilujeng, I., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2017). The Effect of Science Learning Integrated with Local Potential of Wood Carving and Pottery Towards the Junior High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9598.
Diani, R., Irwandani, I., Al-Hijrah, A. H., Yetri, Y., Fujiani, D., Hartati, N. S., & Umam, R. (2019). Physics Learning through Active Learning Based Interactive Conceptual Instructions (ALBICI) to Improve Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 48–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i1.3469.
Gentrup, S., Lorenz, G., Kristen, C., & Kogan, I. (2020). Self-fulfilling Prophecies in the Classroom: Teacher Expectations, Teacher Feedback and Student Achievement. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101296.
Grossmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2019). Experimentation in Biology Lessons: Guided Discovery through Incremental Scaffolds. International Journal of Science Education, 41(6), 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1579392.
Hidayatulloh, M., Humairoh, F., Wachidah, U., Iswati, D. A., & Suliyanah, S. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Rangkaian Listrik dengan Scientific Approach. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 5(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v5n1.p28-32.
In’am, A., & Hajar, S. (2017). Learning Geometry through Discovery Learning Using a Scientific Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 55–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1014a.
Isdaryanti, B., Rahman, M., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Florentinus, T. S., & Widodo, W. (2018). Teachers’ Performance in Science Learning Management Integrated with Character Education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12887.
Kalathaki, M. (2015). Evaluation Tool for the Application of Discovery Teaching Method in the Greek Environmental School Projects. World Journal of Education, 5(2), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v5n2p40.
Kamiludin, K., & Suryaman, M. (2017). Problematika pada Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v5i1.8391.
Kemendikbud. (2019a). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemendikbud. (2019b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2019 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kistner, S., Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. D., & Kortenkamp, U. (2016). Model Development in Scientific Discovery Learning with a Computer-based Physics Task. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 446–455. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V6I2.19716.
Kisworo, K., Ngabekti, S., & Indriyanti, D. R. (2017). Faktor Determinan dari Guru dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Tingkat SMP di Wonosobo. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 179–185. Retrieved from https://journal. unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/19716.
Listiana, L., & Bahri, A. (2019). Empowering Student’s Creativity Thinking Skill in Biology Classroom: Potential of Group Investigation Combined with Think Talk Write (GITTW) Strategy. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 477–483. https:// doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7370.
Lukum, A. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran IPA SMP Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552.
Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Sumiati, I. D., Sari, T. M., & Ismirawati, N. (2019). Ricosre: A Learning Model to Develop Critical Thinking Skills for Students with Different Academic Abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 417–434. Retrieved from https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2019_2_27.pdf.
Miterianifa, A., & Saputro, S. (2020). Suciati,“Critical Thinking Skills Profile of Senior High School Students in Learning Chemistry,.” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Rev, 8(1), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8379.
Murnawianto, S., Sarwanto, S., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2017). STEM-based Science Learning in Junior High School: Potency for Training Students’ Thinking Skill. Pancaran Pendidikan, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v6i4.86.
Nappi, J. S. (2017). The Importance of Questioning in Developing Critical Thinking Skills. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 84(1), 30-41.
Ott, L. E., Carpenter, T. S., Hamilton, D. S., & LaCourse, W. R. (2018). Discovery Learning: Development of a Unique Active Learning Environment for Introductory Chemistry. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/ 10.14434/josotl.v18i4.23112.
Pitt, E., Bearman, M., & Esterhazy, R. (2019). The Conundrum of Low Achievement and Feedback for Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Putri, R. F., & Jumadi, J. (2017). Kemampuan Guru Fisika dalam Menerapkan Model-model Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 serta Kendala-kendala yang Dihadapi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.8636.
Raharja, J. T., & Retnowati, T. H. (2013). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Seni Budaya SMA di Kabupaten Lombok Timur, NTB. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1701.
Rahmania, A. F., & Kaniawati, I. (2017). Role of Integrated Sciences Teaching Materials on Pressure Topic to Improve Student’s Critical Thinking Skills in Junior. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v5i2.4697.
Ralph, R. A. (2016). Post Secondary Project-based Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.155.
Rau, M. A., Kennedy, K., Oxtoby, L., Bollom, M., & Moore, J. W. (2017). Unpacking “Active Learning”: A Combination of Flipped Classroom and Collaboration Support is more Effective but Collaboration Support Alone is Not. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00240.
Saragih, S., Napitupulu, E. E., & Fauzi, A. (2017). Developing learning Model Based on Local Culture and Instrument for Mathematical Higher Order Thinking Ability. International Education Studies, 10(06), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies. v10n6p114.
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173.
Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Siregar, H. (2019). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966.
Stake, R. E. (1976). The Countenance of Educational Evaluation, Cited in D. Jenkins, Six Alternative Models of Curriculum Evaluation, Unit 20, E 203. Curriculum Design and Development. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Suhendi, H. Y., Mulhayatiah, D., & Zakwandi, R. (2018). The Effectiveness of Worksheet Based Learning of Rotational Dynamics on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Viewed from IQ Score. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(1). https://doi.org/ 10.24235/sc.educatia.v7i1.2162.
Sundayana, R., Herman, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Using ASSURE Learning Design to Develop Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 245–249.
Suparwoto. (2011). Evaluasi Kinerja Guru IPA SD, SMP, dan SMA Pasca Sertifikasi. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk. v41i1.506.
Supriyatno, T., Susilawati, S., & Ahdi, H. (2020). E-learning Development in Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1099–1106.
Susilowati, S. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Inquiry dalam Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar IPS Terpadu. J-PIPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial), 2(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.18860/jpips.v2i1.6836.
Tatum, B. C. (2019). Developing and Evaluating Educational Programs. In the Essence of Academic Performance. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89574.
Tompong, B. N. K. J., & Jailani, J. (2019). An Evaluation of Mathematics Learning Program at Primary Education using Countenance Stake Evaluation Model. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.21831/ pep.v23i2.16473.
Trumper, R. (2006). Factors Affecting Junior High School Students’ Interest in Physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47–58.
Wagner, W., Gollner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., & Ludtke, O. (2013). Construct Validity of Student Perceptions of Instructional Quality is High, but not Perfect: Dimensionality and Generalizability of Domain-independent Assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013. 03.003.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning Junior Secondary Sience through Multi-modal Representation. E-Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 87–107.
Widuri, S., Mchusni, M., & Yuningsih, E. K. (2019). Koflusa learning Media for Static Fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1), 12181. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/1175/1/012181.
Winaryati, E., Suyata, S., & Sumarno, S. (2013). Model Evaluasi dalam Supervisi Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Lima Domain Sains. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1698.
Wong, O. Y., Gillan, C., Harnett, N., & Li, W. (2017). Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Electronic Learning Tool for Volumetric Imaging Training Perceptions of Radiation Therapy Professionals. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48(4), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2017.08.005.
Wraga, W. G. (2017). Understanding the Tyler Rationale: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction in Historical Context. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 4(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.156.
Wu, S. S., Chen, L., Battista, C., Watts, A. K. S., Willcutt, E. G., & Menon, V. (2017). Distinct Influences of Affective and Cognitive Factors on Children’s Non-verbal and Verbal Mathematical Abilities. Cognition, 166, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cognition.2017.05.016.
Yang, H. (2017). A Research on the Effective Questioning Strategies in Class. Science Journal of Education, 5(4), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu. 20170504.16.
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Minan Chusni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3)Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
